REVIEW 3 cited by
TELeR: A General Taxonomy of LLM Prompts for Benchmarking Complex Tasks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
TELeR: A General Taxonomy of LLM Prompts for Benchmarking Complex Tasks
read the original abstract
While LLMs have shown great success in understanding and generating text in traditional conversational settings, their potential for performing ill-defined complex tasks is largely under-studied. Indeed, we are yet to conduct comprehensive benchmarking studies with multiple LLMs that are exclusively focused on a complex task. However, conducting such benchmarking studies is challenging because of the large variations in LLMs' performance when different prompt types/styles are used and different degrees of detail are provided in the prompts. To address this issue, the paper proposes a general taxonomy that can be used to design prompts with specific properties in order to perform a wide range of complex tasks. This taxonomy will allow future benchmarking studies to report the specific categories of prompts used as part of the study, enabling meaningful comparisons across different studies. Also, by establishing a common standard through this taxonomy, researchers will be able to draw more accurate conclusions about LLMs' performance on a specific complex task.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Exploring LLMs for South Asian Music Understanding and Generation
This paper introduces a 504-question benchmark for South Asian music understanding and a controlled prompting framework for generation, reporting frontier LLMs at 85-90% on understanding but only 40% stylistic faithfu...
-
Characterizing Students' LLM Usage Behaviors and Their Association with Learning in Critical Thinking Tasks
Refined bottom-up categories of LLM usage in critical thinking homework, labeled by student initiative, are examined for associations with midterm performance across two course offerings.
-
Characterizing Students' LLM Usage Behaviors and Their Association with Learning in Critical Thinking Tasks
Refined bottom-up categorization of LLM usage types in critical thinking homework, labeled by student initiative, shows associations with midterm performance across two course offerings.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.