Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Detecting and Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision Language Models via Fine-Grained AI Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.14233 v2 pith:TY5A5ROP submitted 2024-04-22 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords hallucinationlvlmsmitigatingmodelshallucinationspreferenceproposeannotation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapidly developing Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have shown notable capabilities on a range of multi-modal tasks, but still face the hallucination phenomena where the generated texts do not align with the given contexts, significantly restricting the usages of LVLMs. Most previous work detects and mitigates hallucination at the coarse-grained level or requires expensive annotation (e.g., labeling by proprietary models or human experts). To address these issues, we propose detecting and mitigating hallucinations in LVLMs via fine-grained AI feedback. The basic idea is that we generate a small-size sentence-level hallucination annotation dataset by proprietary models, whereby we train a hallucination detection model which can perform sentence-level hallucination detection, covering primary hallucination types (i.e., object, attribute, and relationship). Then, we propose a detect-then-rewrite pipeline to automatically construct preference dataset for training hallucination mitigating model. Furthermore, we propose differentiating the severity of hallucinations, and introducing a Hallucination Severity-Aware Direct Preference Optimization (HSA-DPO) for mitigating hallucination in LVLMs by incorporating the severity of hallucinations into preference learning. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LPOI: Listwise Preference Optimization for Vision Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    LPOI reduces VLM hallucination by training the model to prefer the original image over progressively masked versions of the same image, using a listwise ranking loss built from pairwise preference data.

  2. Groc-PO: Grounded Context Preference Optimization for Truthful Multimodal LLMs

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Groc-PO applies preference optimization at three grounded stages — object grounding, contextual grounding, grounded reasoning — and outperforms final-answer-only DPO on hallucination and complex-reasoning benchmarks.

  3. Seeing Far and Clearly: Mitigating Hallucinations in MLLMs with Attention Causal Decoding

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FarSight adds upper-triangular negative biases to the causal mask to absorb outlier-token attention, reducing hallucinations in MLLMs without training.

Pith tools