Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 5 cited by

BetaWeb: Towards a Blockchain-enabled Trustworthy Agentic Web

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read BetaWeb proposes a blockchain layer that would let large-scale AI agents trust, coordinate, and pay one another across domains.

desk verdict The submitted 'manuscript' is a mismatch – the abstract describes a blockchain-agentic web framework, the body is an unrelated mining-robot LiDAR paper, so there is nothing to review as BetaWeb. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.13787 v1 pith:TYFMV7ZY submitted 2025-08-19 cs.MA cs.AIcs.NI

Zihan Guo , Yuanjian Zhou , Chenyi Wang , Linlin You , Minjie Bian , Weinan Zhang This is my paper
classification cs.MAcs.AIcs.NI
keywords BetaWebblockchainLLM-basedmulti-agentsystemsAgenticWeb3.5decentralizedtrustagentcapabilityownershipAIeconomics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

BetaWeb's abstract argues that blockchain can serve as the trust and incentive layer for large-scale, heterogeneous, cross-domain LLM-based multi-agent systems (LaMAS). It claims this would move the web from Web3's data ownership to a Web3.5 centered on ownership of agent capabilities and monetization of intelligence, and presents a five-stage roadmap from passive execution to autonomous governance. A sympathetic reader would care because fragmented, closed agent ecosystems currently block interconnected autonomous AI. However, the supplied full text of this manuscript is an unrelated paper about an autonomous mine-site inspection robot, so this version contains no technical argument for the BetaWeb claims.

What carries the argument

The central object is BetaWeb, a blockchain-enabled framework proposed as the trust and incentive layer for LaMAS (LLM-based multi-agent systems). It relies on blockchain's ledger, consensus, and token mechanisms to record agent actions, measure value, and enforce agreements, converting the web paradigm from Web3 (data ownership) to Web3.5 (ownership of agent capabilities and monetization of intelligence). The paper also proposes a five-stage evolution roadmap describing how LaMAS mature from passive execution to autonomous governance. Because the supplied full text is a different, unrelated manuscript, the detailed architecture and mechanisms are not present in this version.

What would settle it

Read the supplied full text: it is not about BetaWeb at all, so the paper's central claims are presently unsupported. To test the design claim itself, deploy two agents that negotiate a task on a public testnet and measure whether a payment-and-verification round trip completes within the task's deadline.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the basis of its abstract, the paper claims that deep integration of blockchain with LLM-based multi-agent systems can create a resilient, trustworthy, and sustainably incentivized digital ecosystem. The proposed BetaWeb architecture would use blockchain's inherent strengths to overcome privacy, data-management, and value-measurement challenges that block the Agentic Web, enabling ownership and monetization of agent intelligence rather than only data. The manuscript also introduces a five-stage evolutionary roadmap for LaMAS and a comparative analysis of existing products. The supplied body text does not contain this material; it is a different paper on blast-hole inspection, so the techn

Load-bearing premise

The abstract assumes that a blockchain can be both trustworthy and scalable enough to coordinate large-scale, real-time, cross-domain agent interactions, and that the supplied full text actually contains that argument; the text supplied here is a different paper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If blockchain supplies the trust layer, agents from different providers and domains could safely delegate tasks and settle payments without a central operator.
  • Agent capabilities could become ownable, rentable assets, creating an economy where intelligence is monetized.
  • A five-stage roadmap suggests LaMAS can evolve from simple execution to collaboration and autonomous governance.
  • A blockchain audit trail would make agent decisions transparent and tamper-evident.
  • The proposed framework would break fragmented, closed ecosystems by providing a common infrastructure for heterogeneous agents.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The strongest claim currently has no derivable support from this manuscript: the supplied full text is an unrelated mining-robot paper, so the BetaWeb architecture, formalization, and experiments are absent.
  • A testable extension would be to deploy a minimal cross-domain agent delegation market on a testnet and measure whether transaction finality and fees permit real-time coordination; the abstract does not report such measurements.
  • Web3.5 as described implies a shift in what is owned: data remains owned, but the services and capabilities that act on data become tokenized assets, which raises questions about liability and revocation that the abstract does not address.
  • The five-stage roadmap could be mapped to concrete capability benchmarks for agent autonomy, but the abstract provides no evaluation criteria.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The submitted manuscript is internally inconsistent: the abstract and title describe a blockchain-enabled trustworthy Agentic Web framework called BetaWeb, including a five-stage evolutionary roadmap, comparative product analysis, and a Web3-to-Web3.5 paradigm shift. The full text, however, is an unrelated preprint about LiDAR-based blast-hole detection and autonomous mine-site inspection (arXiv:2508.13785v2, cs.RO). The full text contains no mention of BetaWeb, blockchain, large-language-model-based multi-agent systems (LaMAS), Agentic Web, Web3.5, or any of the technical content promised in the abstract. No architecture, derivation, evaluation, or comparative analysis for BetaWeb is present.

Significance. If the claimed BetaWeb framework were actually presented and validated, a blockchain-based trust and incentive layer for large-scale heterogeneous agent interactions could be a meaningful contribution to the multi-agent systems and Web3 literature. However, because the submitted full text is a different paper entirely, there is no technical content to evaluate. The potential significance is therefore entirely contingent on the existence of a separate manuscript that is not under review here. The GitHub repository link cannot substitute for the missing exposition, and the reviewer cannot assess correctness, novelty, or empirical support from the supplied materials.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Full Text] The full text is not the paper described by the abstract. The abstract introduces BetaWeb and claims a 'systematic examination' of the framework, a five-stage roadmap, a comparative analysis, and a discussion of key challenges. The body text, however, is 'Blast Hole Seeking and Dipping – The Navigation and Perception Framework in a Mine Site Inspection Robot,' with no occurrence of BetaWeb, blockchain, LaMAS, Agentic Web, Web3.5, or any related terminology. This is not a minor formatting issue; it means the central claim has no supporting argument in the submitted manuscript.
  2. [Sections 1–7 (full text)] There is no section, equation, or table that addresses the core contributions claimed in the abstract. The abstract promises a trustworthy and scalable infrastructure for LaMAS and a Web3.5 paradigm, but the full text's sections cover LiDAR point-cloud processing, navigation state machines, and mining-robot field trials. No technical derivation of BetaWeb's architecture, consensus mechanisms, incentive design, privacy measures, or scalability analysis is present. A claim without its evidence cannot be verified.
  3. [GitHub link in abstract] The abstract refers to 'A summary of the enabling technologies for each stage' at a GitHub repository. Even if that repository contains supplementary material, it cannot replace the missing technical exposition in the manuscript itself. The review process evaluates the submitted version of record, not external links that may change or may not correspond to the intended paper. The central claim is therefore unverifiable from the manuscript as submitted.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Title and authorship] The title on the manuscript header ('Blast Hole Seeking and Dipping...') contradicts the abstract's title ('BetaWeb: Towards a Blockchain-enabled Trustworthy Agentic Web'). The author list on the full text also appears different from what one would expect for the BetaWeb paper. This suggests a submission mix-up that should be resolved before any further review.
  2. [References and terminology] The reference list and terminology in the full text pertain exclusively to robotic perception and mining inspection. None of the cited works relate to blockchain, multi-agent LLM systems, or Web paradigms, so the bibliographic support for the abstract's claims is entirely absent.
  3. [Figures and equations] All figures and equations in the full text concern cone detection, LiDAR projection, and robot navigation. None illustrate or support the claimed BetaWeb framework, the five-stage roadmap, or the Web3.5 concept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity demonstrable: the supplied full text is an unrelated mining-robotics paper, so there is no BetaWeb derivation chain to audit.

full rationale

The submitted full text is arXiv:2508.13785v2, 'Blast Hole Seeking and Dipping – The Navigation and Perception Framework in a Mine Site Inspection Robot', by different authors and with no mention of BetaWeb, LaMAS, Agentic Web, Web3.5, blockchain, or any of the abstract's technical claims. Consequently, no equations, fitted parameters, cited uniqueness theorems, or ansatz steps from the BetaWeb manuscript are available for inspection. Under the hard rule that circularity must be exhibited by quoting the paper and showing a specific reduction (e.g., Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction), no such step can be identified. The abstract's claims about a blockchain-enabled trustworthy Agentic Web may be unsupported by the supplied body — this is a missing-support condition, not a demonstrated circularity. I therefore decline to assign a circularity score above zero. If the correct BetaWeb manuscript is later supplied, the derivation chain can be audited for circularity; from the evidence given, no self-dependence is shown.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 2 invented entities

Because the body text is a different paper, the ledger can only itemize assumptions stated in the abstract. No free parameters are named. Two domain assumptions and two invented labels exhaust the abstract-level content.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Blockchain infrastructure can provide a trustworthy and scalable foundation for large-scale heterogeneous autonomous agent interactions
    Stated in the abstract as an inherent strength of blockchain; no body text or evaluation supports or quantifies scalability, latency, or cost.
  • ad hoc to paper The supplied full text corresponds to the abstract's manuscript
    It does not: the body is a mining robotics paper. Every inference about BetaWeb depends on the text matching the abstract.
invented entities (2)
  • BetaWeb framework
    purpose: Proposed architecture pairing blockchain with LLM-based multi-agent systems for trust, data management, and value exchange
    No specification or testable prediction is provided in the supplied text; the framework exists only as an abstract-level proposal.
  • Web3.5 paradigm
    purpose: A web stage emphasizing ownership of agent capabilities and monetization of intelligence
    A framing label, with no operational definition or measurable properties in the supplied text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of BetaWeb: Towards a Blockchain-enabled Trustworthy Agentic Web." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TYFMV7ZY

@misc{pith2026250813787,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: BetaWeb: Towards a Blockchain-enabled Trustworthy Agentic Web},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TYFMV7ZY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.13787}
}
read the original abstract

The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has significantly propelled the development of artificial intelligence (AI) agents, which are increasingly evolving into diverse autonomous entities, advancing the LLM-based multi-agent systems (LaMAS). However, current agentic ecosystems remain fragmented and closed. Establishing an interconnected and scalable paradigm for Agentic AI has become a critical prerequisite. Although Agentic Web proposes an open architecture to break the ecosystem barriers, its implementation still faces core challenges such as privacy protection, data management, and value measurement. Existing centralized or semi-centralized paradigms suffer from inherent limitations, making them inadequate for supporting large-scale, heterogeneous, and cross-domain autonomous interactions. To address these challenges, this paper introduces the blockchain-enabled trustworthy Agentic Web (BetaWeb). By leveraging the inherent strengths of blockchain, BetaWeb not only offers a trustworthy and scalable infrastructure for LaMAS but also has the potential to advance the Web paradigm from Web3 (centered on data ownership) towards Web3.5, which emphasizes ownership of agent capabilities and the monetization of intelligence. Beyond a systematic examination of the BetaWeb framework, this paper presents a five-stage evolutionary roadmap, outlining the path of LaMAS from passive execution to advanced collaboration and autonomous governance. We also conduct a comparative analysis of existing products and discuss key challenges of BetaWeb from multiple perspectives. Ultimately, we argue that deep integration between blockchain and LaMAS can lay the foundation for a resilient, trustworthy, and sustainably incentivized digital ecosystem. A summary of the enabling technologies for each stage is available at https://github.com/MatZaharia/BetaWeb.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dissociative Identity: Language Model Agents Lack Grounding for Reputation Mechanisms

    cs.CY 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    VLMs preserve linearly separable visual magnitudes and can compare them, yet collapse at symbolic mapping because visual and textual number spaces remain fractured and disjoint.

  2. Dissociative Identity: Language Model Agents Lack Grounding for Reputation Mechanisms

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    LM agents' changeable modules prevent persistent identity and sanction sensitivity, making reputation mechanisms structurally inapplicable and requiring protocol-based behavioral harnesses instead.

  3. Holos: A Web-Scale LLM-Based Multi-Agent System for the Agentic Web

    cs.AI 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Holos is a five-layer LLM-based multi-agent system architecture using the Nuwa engine for agent generation, a market-driven Orchestrator for coordination, and an endogenous value cycle for incentive-compatible persist...

  4. Clarus: Coordinating Autonomous Research Agents toward Web-Scale Scientific Collaboration

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Clarus is a four-layer collaboration infrastructure with a project-agent-resource model that reformulates research as an open, traceable, multi-participant process.

  5. Position: Agentic AI System Is a Foreseeable Pathway to AGI

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Agentic AI systems with DAG topologies are claimed to deliver exponentially superior generalization and sample efficiency compared to monolithic scaling for achieving AGI.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Deepak Bhaskar Acharya, Karthigeyan Kuppan, and B. Divya. Agentic ai: Autonomous intelligence for complex goals—a comprehensive survey. IEEE Access, 13: 0 18912--18936, 2025

    2025

  2. [2]

    Agntcy origins

    AGNTCY . Agntcy origins. https://docs.agntcy.org/. Accessed: 2025-08-13

    2025

  3. [3]

    Reem Ayad and Jason E. Plaks. Attributions of intent and moral responsibility to AI agents. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 3: 0 100107, 2025. ISSN 2949-8821

    2025

  4. [4]

    Public participation consortium blockchain for smart city governance

    Yuhao Bai, Qin Hu, Seung-Hyun Seo, Kyubyung Kang, and John J Lee. Public participation consortium blockchain for smart city governance. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9 0 (3): 0 2094--2108, 2021

  5. [5]

    Drawing the boundaries between blockchain and blockchain-like systems: A comprehensive survey on distributed ledger technologies

    Badr Bellaj, Aafaf Ouaddah, Emmanuel Bertin, Noel Crespi, and Abdellatif Mezrioui. Drawing the boundaries between blockchain and blockchain-like systems: A comprehensive survey on distributed ledger technologies. Proceedings of the IEEE, 112 0 (3): 0 247--299, 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    Data is infrastructure

    Elettra Bietti. Data is infrastructure. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 26 0 (1): 0 55--87, 2025

    2025

  7. [7]

    Pobt: A lightweight consensus algorithm for scalable iot business blockchain

    Sujit Biswas, Kashif Sharif, Fan Li, Sabita Maharjan, Saraju P Mohanty, and Yu Wang. Pobt: A lightweight consensus algorithm for scalable iot business blockchain. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7 0 (3): 0 2343--2355, 2019

    2019

  8. [8]

    Decentralized autonomous organizations: a systematic literature review and research agenda

    Severin Bonnet and Frank Teuteberg. Decentralized autonomous organizations: a systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 21 0 (04): 0 2450026, 2024

    2024

Show all 119 references
  1. [9]

    Human-artificial interaction in the age of agentic ai: a system-theoretical approach

    Uwe M Borghoff, Paolo Bottoni, and Remo Pareschi. Human-artificial interaction in the age of agentic ai: a system-theoretical approach. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 7: 0 1579166, 2025

    2025

  2. [10]

    Agentic workflows for conversational human-ai interaction design

    Arthur Caetano, Kavya Verma, Atieh Taheri, Radha Kumaran, Zichen Chen, Jiaao Chen, Tobias H \"o llerer, and Misha Sra. Agentic workflows for conversational human-ai interaction design. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18002, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    State of the art of zero-knowledge proofs in blockchain

    Darko C apko, Sr an Vukmirovi \'c , and Nemanja Nedi \'c . State of the art of zero-knowledge proofs in blockchain. In 2022 30th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR), pp.\ 1--4. IEEE, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    Can we govern the agent-to-agent economy? arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.16606, 2025

    Tomer Jordi Chaffer. Can we govern the agent-to-agent economy? arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.16606, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  5. [14]

    Decentralized governance of autonomous AI agents

    Tomer Jordi Chaffer, Charles von Goins II, Bayo Okusanya, Dontrail Cotlage, and Justin Goldston. Decentralized governance of autonomous AI agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.17114, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  6. [15]

    Chainopera AI : The collaborative intelligence of AI agent network

    ChainOpera AI . Chainopera AI : The collaborative intelligence of AI agent network. https://paper.chainopera.ai/. Accessed: 2025-08-13

    2025

  7. [16]

    From automation system to autonomous system: An architecture perspective

    Hualong Chen, Yuanqiao Wen, Man Zhu, Yamin Huang, Changshi Xiao, Tao Wei, and Axel Hahn. From automation system to autonomous system: An architecture perspective. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9 0 (6), 2021. ISSN 2077-1312

    2021

  8. [17]

    S-agents: Self-organizing agents in open-ended environments

    Jiaqi Chen, Yuxian Jiang, Jiachen Lu, and Li Zhang. S-agents: Self-organizing agents in open-ended environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04578, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  9. [18]

    A survey on on-chain-off-chain scalability in blockchain

    Chiedu Charles Chiedu, Keke Gai, Yihang Wei, and Kai Ding. A survey on on-chain-off-chain scalability in blockchain. In 2025 IEEE 11th Conference on Big Data Security on Cloud (BigDataSecurity), pp.\ 71--82. IEEE, 2025

    2025

  10. [19]

    Open challenges in multi-agent security: Towards secure systems of interacting ai agents

    Christian Schroeder de Witt. Open challenges in multi-agent security: Towards secure systems of interacting ai agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.02077, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Ai agents under threat: A survey of key security challenges and future pathways

    Zehang Deng, Yongjian Guo, Changzhou Han, Wanlun Ma, Junwu Xiong, Sheng Wen, and Yang Xiang. Ai agents under threat: A survey of key security challenges and future pathways. ACM Computing Surveys, 57 0 (7): 0 1--36, 2025

    2025

  12. [21]

    Failures of public key infrastructure: 53 year survey

    Adrian-Tudor Dumitrescu and Johan Pouwelse. Failures of public key infrastructure: 53 year survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.05239, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  13. [22]

    a ms \"a , Marta Sobocinski, Ridwan Whitehead, Belle Dang, Anni-Sofia Roberts, and Sanna J \

    Justin Edwards, Andy Nguyen, Joni L \"a ms \"a , Marta Sobocinski, Ridwan Whitehead, Belle Dang, Anni-Sofia Roberts, and Sanna J \"a rvel \"a . Human-ai collaboration: Designing artificial agents to facilitate socially shared regulation among learners. British Journal of Educa...

    2025

  14. [23]

    A coordinated scheduling approach for task assignment and multi-agent path planning

    Chengyuan Fang, Jianlin Mao, Dayan Li, Ning Wang, and Niya Wang. A coordinated scheduling approach for task assignment and multi-agent path planning. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 36 0 (1): 0 101930, 2024

    2024

  15. [24]

    A comprehensive survey of self-evolving ai agents: A new paradigm bridging foundation models and lifelong agentic systems

    Jinyuan Fang, Yanwen Peng, Xi Zhang, Yingxu Wang, Xinhao Yi, Guibin Zhang, Yi Xu, Bin Wu, Siwei Liu, Zihao Li, et al. A comprehensive survey of self-evolving ai agents: A new paradigm bridging foundation models and lifelong agentic systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.07407, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Towards trustworthy autonomous systems: Taxonomies and future perspectives

    Francesco Flammini, Cristina Alcaraz, Emanuele Bellini, Stefano Marrone, Javier Lopez, and Andrea Bondavalli. Towards trustworthy autonomous systems: Taxonomies and future perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 12 0 (2): 0 601--614, 2024. doi:10.1109/...

    2024

  17. [26]

    Single-agent or multi-agent systems? why not both? arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18286, 2025

    Mingyan Gao, Yanzi Li, Banruo Liu, Yifan Yu, Phillip Wang, Ching-Yu Lin, and Fan Lai. Single-agent or multi-agent systems? why not both? arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18286, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Trusted execution environments: Applications and organizational challenges

    Tim Geppert, Stefan Deml, David Sturzenegger, and Nico Ebert. Trusted execution environments: Applications and organizational challenges. Frontiers in Computer Science, 4: 0 930741, 2022

    2022

  19. [28]

    Google agentspace

    Google Cloud . Google agentspace. https://cloud.google.com/products/agentspace. Accessed: 2025-08-13

    2025

  20. [29]

    A systematic review of blockchain-based system: Transaction throughput latency and challenges

    M Gracy and B Rebecca Jeyavadhanam. A systematic review of blockchain-based system: Transaction throughput latency and challenges. In 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications (ICCICA), pp.\ 1--6. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  21. [30]

    Iot and blockchain: A review and a technical-legal-social acceptance model

    Katia Guerra, Chang Koh, Victor Prybutok, and Vess Johnson. Iot and blockchain: A review and a technical-legal-social acceptance model. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 65 0 (1): 0 47--63, 2025

    2025

  22. [31]

    Large language model based multi-agents: A survey of progress and challenges

    Taicheng Guo, Xiuying Chen, Yaqi Wang, Ruidi Chang, Shichao Pei, Nitesh V Chawla, Olaf Wiest, and Xiangliang Zhang. Large language model based multi-agents: A survey of progress and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01680, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Hajime AI : Decentralized multi-agent graph on solana, democratic AI for all

    HajimeTeam . Hajime AI : Decentralized multi-agent graph on solana, democratic AI for all. https://www.hajime.ai/blog/01J4RP2A58X5ZDP1G51R852WM8. Accessed: 2025-08-13

    2025

  24. [33]

    How can incentive mechanisms and blockchain benefit with each other? a survey

    Rong Han, Zheng Yan, Xueqin Liang, and Laurence T Yang. How can incentive mechanisms and blockchain benefit with each other? a survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 55 0 (7): 0 1--38, 2022

    2022

  25. [34]

    Llm multi-agent systems: Challenges and open problems

    Shanshan Han, Qifan Zhang, Yuhang Yao, Weizhao Jin, and Zhaozhuo Xu. Llm multi-agent systems: Challenges and open problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03578, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Blockchain-based p2p content delivery with monetary incentivization and fairness guarantee

    Songlin He, Yuan Lu, Qiang Tang, Guiling Wang, and Chase Qishi Wu. Blockchain-based p2p content delivery with monetary incentivization and fairness guarantee. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 34 0 (2): 0 746--765, 2022

    2022

  27. [36]

    Is decentralized artificial intelligence governable? towards machine sovereignty and human symbiosis

    Botao Hu, Helena Rong, and Janna Tay. Is decentralized artificial intelligence governable? towards machine sovereignty and human symbiosis. Helena and Tay, Janna, 2025 a

    2025

  28. [37]

    Trustless autonomy: Understanding motivations, benefits and governance dilemma in self-sovereign decentralized ai agents

    Botao Amber Hu, Yuhan Liu, and Helena Rong. Trustless autonomy: Understanding motivations, benefits and governance dilemma in self-sovereign decentralized ai agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09757, 2025 b

    2025

  29. [38]

    On artificial intelligence and manipulation

    Marcello Ienca. On artificial intelligence and manipulation. Topoi, 42 0 (3): 0 833--842, 2023

    2023

  30. [39]

    Mrl-pos: A multi-agent reinforcement learning based proof of stake consensus algorithm for blockchain

    Tariqul Islam, Faisal Haque Bappy, Tarannum Shaila Zaman, Md Sajidul Islam Sajid, and Mir Mehedi Ahsan Pritom. Mrl-pos: A multi-agent reinforcement learning based proof of stake consensus algorithm for blockchain. In 2024 IEEE 14th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop a...

    2024

  31. [40]

    Are blockchain-based digital transformation and ecosystem-based business models mutually reinforcing? the principal-agent conflict perspective

    Ilya Ivaninskiy and Irina Ivashkovskaya. Are blockchain-based digital transformation and ecosystem-based business models mutually reinforcing? the principal-agent conflict perspective. 12 0 (4): 0 643--670. ISSN 2147-4281

  32. [41]

    The evolution of agentic ai: Architecture and workflows for autonomous systems

    Manoj Kumar Reddy Jaggavarapu. The evolution of agentic ai: Architecture and workflows for autonomous systems. Journal Of Multidisciplinary, 5 0 (7): 0 418--427, 2025

    2025

  33. [42]

    Large language model enhanced multi-agent systems for 6g communications

    Feibo Jiang, Yubo Peng, Li Dong, Kezhi Wang, Kun Yang, Cunhua Pan, Dusit Niyato, and Octavia A Dobre. Large language model enhanced multi-agent systems for 6g communications. IEEE Wireless Communications, 2024

    2024

  34. [43]

    No ai is an island: the case for teaming intelligence

    Matthew Johnson and Alonso Vera. No ai is an island: the case for teaming intelligence. AI magazine, 40 0 (1): 0 16--28, 2019

    2019

  35. [44]

    Managing a blockchain-based platform ecosystem for industry-wide adoption: The case of tradelens

    Marin Jovanovic, Nikola Kosti \'c , Ina M Sebastian, and Tomaz Sedej. Managing a blockchain-based platform ecosystem for industry-wide adoption: The case of tradelens. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184: 0 121981, 2022

    2022

  36. [45]

    Ai agents meet blockchain: A survey on secure and scalable collaboration for multi-agents

    Md Monjurul Karim, Dong Hoang Van, Sangeen Khan, Qiang Qu, and Yaroslav Kholodov. Ai agents meet blockchain: A survey on secure and scalable collaboration for multi-agents. Future Internet, 17 0 (2): 0 57, 2025

    2025

  37. [46]

    AI agent governance: A field guide

    Jam Kraprayoon, Zoe Williams, and Rida Fayyaz. AI agent governance: A field guide. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21808, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Ai agents: Evolution, architecture, and real-world applications

    Naveen Krishnan. Ai agents: Evolution, architecture, and real-world applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.12687, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Towards a methodology for formally analyzing federated identity management systems

    Katerina Ksystra, Maria Dimarogkona, Nikolaos Triantafyllou, Petros Stefaneas, and Petros Kavassalis. Towards a methodology for formally analyzing federated identity management systems. In International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, pp.\ 382--405. Spr...

    2022

  40. [49]

    Homo agenticus in the age of agentic ai: Agency loops, power displacement, and the circulation of responsibility

    Paul M Leonardi. Homo agenticus in the age of agentic ai: Agency loops, power displacement, and the circulation of responsibility. Information and Organization, 35 0 (3): 0 100582, 2025

    2025

  41. [50]

    Adaptive legal frameworks and economic dynamics in emerging tech-nologies: Navigating the intersection for responsible innovation

    Lyytinen Lescrauwaet, Hekkert Wagner, Cheng Yoon, and Sovacool Shukla. Adaptive legal frameworks and economic dynamics in emerging tech-nologies: Navigating the intersection for responsible innovation. Law and Economics, 16 0 (3): 0 202–220, Oct. 2022

    2022

  42. [51]

    Mao: A framework for process model generation with multi-agent orchestration

    Leilei Lin, Yumeng Jin, Yingming Zhou, Wenlong Chen, and Chen Qian. Mao: A framework for process model generation with multi-agent orchestration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.01916, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  43. [52]

    Secure and scalable cross-domain data sharing in zero-trust cloud-edge-end environment based on sharding blockchain

    Yizhong Liu, Xinxin Xing, Ziheng Tong, Xun Lin, Jing Chen, Zhenyu Guan, Qianhong Wu, and Willy Susilo. Secure and scalable cross-domain data sharing in zero-trust cloud-edge-end environment based on sharding blockchain. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 21 ...

    2023

  44. [53]

    Large language model agent: A survey on methodology, applications and challenges

    Junyu Luo, Weizhi Zhang, Ye Yuan, Yusheng Zhao, Junwei Yang, Yiyang Gu, Bohan Wu, Binqi Chen, Ziyue Qiao, Qingqing Long, et al. Large language model agent: A survey on methodology, applications and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21460, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  45. [54]

    The landscape of emerging ai agent architectures for reasoning, planning, and tool calling: A survey

    Tula Masterman, Sandi Besen, Mason Sawtell, and Alex Chao. The landscape of emerging ai agent architectures for reasoning, planning, and tool calling: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.11584, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  46. [55]

    Manis, Siyanna Lilova, Nicholas Vadivoulis, Stamatis Gatirdakis, Styliani Roussou, and Rodayna Hmede

    Emanuele Mezzi, Asimina Mertzani, Michael P. Manis, Siyanna Lilova, Nicholas Vadivoulis, Stamatis Gatirdakis, Styliani Roussou, and Rodayna Hmede. Who owns the output? bridging law and technology in LLMs attribution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.01032, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Toward the mass adoption of blockchain: Cross-industry insights from defi, gaming, and data analytics

    Shezon Saleem Mohammed Abdul, Anup Shrestha, and Jianming Yong. Toward the mass adoption of blockchain: Cross-industry insights from defi, gaming, and data analytics. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 9 0 (7): 0 178, 2025

    2025

  48. [57]

    Agentic ai: Autonomy, accountability, and the algorithmic society

    Anirban Mukherjee and Hannah Hanwen Chang. Agentic ai: Autonomy, accountability, and the algorithmic society. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.00289, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Securing agentic ai: A comprehensive threat model and mitigation framework for generative ai agents

    Vineeth Sai Narajala and Om Narayan. Securing agentic ai: A comprehensive threat model and mitigation framework for generative ai agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19956, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  50. [59]

    Blockchain: the economic and financial institution for autonomous ai? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17 0 (2): 0 54, 2024

    Binh Nguyen Thanh, Ha Xuan Son, and Diem Thi Hong Vo. Blockchain: the economic and financial institution for autonomous ai? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17 0 (2): 0 54, 2024

    2024

  51. [60]

    Very large-scale multi-agent simulation in agentscope

    Xuchen Pan, Dawei Gao, Yuexiang Xie, Yushuo Chen, Zhewei Wei, Yaliang Li, Bolin Ding, Ji-Rong Wen, and Jingren Zhou. Very large-scale multi-agent simulation in agentscope. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.17789, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Disparate impact of artificial intelligence bias in ridehailing economy's price discrimination algorithms

    Akshat Pandey and Aylin Caliskan. Disparate impact of artificial intelligence bias in ridehailing economy's price discrimination algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp.\ 822--833, 2021

    2021

  53. [62]

    Legion space

    PayEgis . Legion space. https://space.tongfudun.com/?lang=en. Accessed: 2025-08-13

    2025

  54. [63]

    From semantic web and mas to agentic AI : A unified narrative of the web of agents

    Tatiana Petrova, Aleksandr Puzikov, Boris Bliznukov, and Radu State. From semantic web and mas to agentic AI : A unified narrative of the web of agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.10644, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Cross-industry frameworks for business process reengineering: Conceptual models and practical executions

    Oladapo Adeboye Popoola, Henry Ejiga Adama, Chukwuekem David Okeke, and Abiodun Emmanuel Akinoso. Cross-industry frameworks for business process reengineering: Conceptual models and practical executions. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 22 0 (01): 0 1198--1208, 2024

    2024

  56. [65]

    The path to AGI : A deep dive into open AI 's 5-level framework

    Priyanka Sharma . The path to AGI : A deep dive into open AI 's 5-level framework. https://twimbit.com/about/blogs/the-path-to-agi-a-deep-dive-into-openais-5-level-framework. Accessed: 2025-08-13

    2025

  57. [66]

    Shadow AI : Cyber security implications, opportunities and challenges in the unseen frontier

    Deepak Puthal, Amit Kumar Mishra, Saraju P Mohanty, Antonella Longo, and Chan Yeob Yeun. Shadow AI : Cyber security implications, opportunities and challenges in the unseen frontier. SN Computer Science, 6 0 (5): 0 405, 2025

    2025

  58. [67]

    Inter blockchain communication: A survey

    Ilham A Qasse, Manar Abu Talib, and Qassim Nasir. Inter blockchain communication: A survey. In Proceedings of the ArabWIC 6th Annual International Conference Research Track, pp.\ 1--6, 2019

    2019

  59. [68]

    Scaling large language model-based multi-agent collaboration

    Chen Qian, Zihao Xie, Yifei Wang, Wei Liu, Kunlun Zhu, Hanchen Xia, Yufan Dang, Zhuoyun Du, Weize Chen, Cheng Yang, et al. Scaling large language model-based multi-agent collaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.07155, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  60. [69]

    Take it, leave it, or fix it: Measuring productivity and trust in human- AI collaboration

    Crystal Qian and James Wexler. Take it, leave it, or fix it: Measuring productivity and trust in human- AI collaboration. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI '24, pp.\ 370–384, New York, NY, USA, 2024. Association for Computi...

    2024

  61. [70]

    Scalability of blockchain: a comprehensive review and future research direction

    Iqra Sadia Rao, ML Mat Kiah, M Muzaffar Hameed, and Zain Anwer Memon. Scalability of blockchain: a comprehensive review and future research direction. Cluster Computing, 27 0 (5): 0 5547--5570, 2024

    2024

  62. [71]

    Trism for agentic ai: A review of trust, risk, and security management in llm-based agentic multi-agent systems

    Shaina Raza, Ranjan Sapkota, Manoj Karkee, and Christos Emmanouilidis. Trism for agentic ai: A review of trust, risk, and security management in llm-based agentic multi-agent systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04133, 2025

    2025

  63. [72]

    Now the code runs itself: On-chain and off-chain governance of blockchain technologies

    Wessel Reijers, Iris Wuisman, Morshed Mannan, Primavera De Filippi, Christopher Wray, Vienna Rae-Looi, Angela Cubillos V \'e lez, and Liav Orgad. Now the code runs itself: On-chain and off-chain governance of blockchain technologies. Topoi, 40 0 (4): 0 821--831, 2021

    2021

  64. [73]

    The cognitive hourglass: Agent abstractions in the large models era

    Alessandro Ricci, Stefano Mariani, Franco Zambonelli, Samuele Burattini, Cristiano Castelfranchi, et al. The cognitive hourglass: Agent abstractions in the large models era. In AAMAS, volume 24, pp.\ 2706--2711, 2024

    2024

  65. [74]

    Learnchain: Transparent and cooperative reinforcement learning on blockchain

    Hani Sami, Rabeb Mizouni, Hadi Otrok, Shakti Singh, Jamal Bentahar, and Azzam Mourad. Learnchain: Transparent and cooperative reinforcement learning on blockchain. Future Generation Computer Systems, 150: 0 255--271, 2024

    2024

  66. [75]

    Ai agents vs

    Ranjan Sapkota, Konstantinos I Roumeliotis, and Manoj Karkee. Ai agents vs. agentic ai: A conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10468, 2025

    2025

  67. [76]

    Confidential computing and related technologies: a critical review

    Muhammad Usama Sardar and Christof Fetzer. Confidential computing and related technologies: a critical review. Cybersecurity, 6 0 (1): 0 10, 2023

    2023

  68. [77]

    In the walled garden: Challenges and opportunities for research on the practices of the AI tech industry

    Morgan Klaus Scheuerman. In the walled garden: Challenges and opportunities for research on the practices of the AI tech industry. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp.\ 456--466, 2024

    2024

  69. [78]

    Aws marketplace

    Amazon Web Services. Aws marketplace. https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/. Accessed: 2025-08-13

    2025

  70. [79]

    Advancing Security and Resilience, pp.\ 459--529

    Shishir Kumar Shandilya, Agni Datta, Yash Kartik, and Atulya Nagar. Advancing Security and Resilience, pp.\ 459--529. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024. ISBN 978-3-031-53290-0. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-53290-0_8. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53290-0_8

    2024 doi

  71. [80]

    Collaborative agentic AI needs interoperability across ecosystems

    Rishi Sharma, Martijn de Vos, Pradyumna Chari, Ramesh Raskar, and Anne-Marie Kermarrec. Collaborative agentic AI needs interoperability across ecosystems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21550, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  72. [81]

    Ai-driven daos

    Ori Shimony. Ai-driven daos. In Decentralized Autonomous Organizations in the Legal Landscape, pp.\ 348--372. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2025

    2025

  73. [82]

    Human-centered ai: ensuring human control while increasing automation

    Ben Shneiderman. Human-centered ai: ensuring human control while increasing automation. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext, pp.\ 1--2, 2022

    2022

  74. [83]

    Return on investment and return on ad spend at the action level of AIDA using last touch attribution method on digital advertising platforms

    KV Sriram, Anup Ananda Poojary, Vineet Jawa, and Giridhar B Kamath. Return on investment and return on ad spend at the action level of AIDA using last touch attribution method on digital advertising platforms. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 17 0 (...

    2022

  75. [84]

    Data agent: A holistic architecture for orchestrating data+ ai ecosystems

    Zhaoyan Sun, Jiayi Wang, Xinyang Zhao, Jiachi Wang, and Guoliang Li. Data agent: A holistic architecture for orchestrating data+ ai ecosystems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.01599, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  76. [85]

    From autonomous agents to integrated systems, a new paradigm: Orchestrated distributed intelligence

    Krti Tallam. From autonomous agents to integrated systems, a new paradigm: Orchestrated distributed intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13754, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  77. [86]

    On-chain and off-chain data management for blockchain-internet of things: A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach

    Yung Po Tsang, Carman Ka Man Lee, Kening Zhang, Chun-Ho Wu, and WH Ip. On-chain and off-chain data management for blockchain-internet of things: A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach. Journal of Grid Computing, 22 0 (1): 0 16, 2024

    2024

  78. [87]

    Web3-dao: An ontology for decentralized autonomous organizations

    Maria-Cruz Valiente and Juan Pav \'o n. Web3-dao: An ontology for decentralized autonomous organizations. Journal of Web Semantics, 82: 0 100830, 2024

    2024

  79. [88]

    The digital governance puzzle: Towards integrative theory of humans, machines, and organizations in public management

    Eran Vigoda-Gadot and Shlomo Mizrahi. The digital governance puzzle: Towards integrative theory of humans, machines, and organizations in public management. Technology in Society, 77: 0 102530, 2024. ISSN 0160-791X

    2024

  80. [89]

    A survey on large language model based autonomous agents

    Lei Wang, Chen Ma, Xueyang Feng, Zeyu Zhang, Hao Yang, Jingsen Zhang, Zhiyuan Chen, Jiakai Tang, Xu Chen, Yankai Lin, et al. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Frontiers of Computer Science, 18 0 (6): 0 186345, 2024 a

    2024

  81. [90]

    Benchmark self-evolving: A multi-agent framework for dynamic llm evaluation

    Siyuan Wang, Zhuohan Long, Zhihao Fan, Zhongyu Wei, and Xuanjing Huang. Benchmark self-evolving: A multi-agent framework for dynamic llm evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.11443, 2024 b

    2024 arXiv

  82. [91]

    Blockchain: A potential technology to improve the performance of collaborative emergency management with multi-agent participation

    Yanqing Wang and Hong Chen. Blockchain: A potential technology to improve the performance of collaborative emergency management with multi-agent participation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 72: 0 102867, 2022

    2022

  83. [92]

    Internet of agents: Fundamentals, applications, and challenges

    Yuntao Wang, Shaolong Guo, Yanghe Pan, Zhou Su, Fahao Chen, Tom H Luan, Peng Li, Jiawen Kang, and Dusit Niyato. Internet of agents: Fundamentals, applications, and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.07176, 2025 a

    2025

  84. [93]

    Ragen: Understanding self-evolution in llm agents via multi-turn reinforcement learning

    Zihan Wang, Kangrui Wang, Qineng Wang, Pingyue Zhang, Linjie Li, Zhengyuan Yang, Xing Jin, Kefan Yu, Minh Nhat Nguyen, Licheng Liu, et al. Ragen: Understanding self-evolution in llm agents via multi-turn reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.20073, 2025 b

    2025 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Deepcts: A deep reinforcement learning approach for ai container task scheduling

    Zili Xiao, Ke Liu, Miao Hu, and Di Wu. Deepcts: A deep reinforcement learning approach for ai container task scheduling. In Proceedings of the 2024 3rd Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning, pp.\ 342--347, 2024

    2024

  86. [95]

    Enhanced efficiency and security in cross-chain transmission of blockchain internet of ports through multi-feature-based joint learning

    Zeqiang Xie, Xiaowei Zhang, and Xinbing Liu. Enhanced efficiency and security in cross-chain transmission of blockchain internet of ports through multi-feature-based joint learning. Scientific Reports, 15 0 (1): 0 6199, 2025

    2025

  87. [96]

    An incentive mechanism-based minimum adjustment consensus model under dynamic trust relationship

    Yumei Xing, Jian Wu, Francisco Chiclana, Changyong Liang, and Ronald R Yager. An incentive mechanism-based minimum adjustment consensus model under dynamic trust relationship. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 54 0 (6): 0 3666--3678, 2024

    2024

  88. [97]

    Xinghuo-developer- AI -copilot

    Xinghuo . Xinghuo-developer- AI -copilot. https://github.com/caict-4iot-dev/Xinghuo-developer-AI-copilot. Accessed: 2025-08-13

    2025

  89. [98]

    A model value transfer incentive mechanism for federated learning with smart contracts in AIoT

    Gang Xu, De-Lun Kong, Kejia Zhang, Shiyuan Xu, Yibo Cao, Yanhui Mao, Jianyong Duan, Jiawen Kang, and Xiu-Bo Chen. A model value transfer incentive mechanism for federated learning with smart contracts in AIoT . IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024

    2024

  90. [99]

    Transitioning to human interaction with ai systems: New challenges and opportunities for hci professionals to enable human-centered ai

    Wei Xu, Marvin J Dainoff, Liezhong Ge, and Zaifeng Gao. Transitioning to human interaction with ai systems: New challenges and opportunities for hci professionals to enable human-centered ai. International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction, 39 0 (3): 0 494--518, 2023

    2023

  91. [100]

    A review on scalability of blockchain

    Di Yang, Chengnian Long, Han Xu, and Shaoliang Peng. A review on scalability of blockchain. In Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Blockchain Technology, pp.\ 1--6, 2020

    2020

  92. [101]

    Swarm contract: A multi-sovereign agent consensus mechanism

    Haowei Yang. Swarm contract: A multi-sovereign agent consensus mechanism. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19256, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  93. [102]

    Asyncsc: An asynchronous sidechain for multi-domain data exchange in internet of things

    Lingxiao Yang, Xuewen Dong, Zhiguo Wan, Sheng Gao, Wei Tong, Di Lu, Yulong Shen, and Xiaojiang Du. Asyncsc: An asynchronous sidechain for multi-domain data exchange in internet of things. In IEEE INFOCOM 2025-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pp.\ 1--10. IEEE, 2025 a

    2025

  94. [103]

    LLM -based multi-agent systems: Techniques and business perspectives

    Yingxuan Yang, Qiuying Peng, Jun Wang, Ying Wen, and Weinan Zhang. LLM -based multi-agent systems: Techniques and business perspectives. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.14033, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  95. [104]

    Agentic web: Weaving the next web with AI agents

    Yingxuan Yang, Mulei Ma, Yuxuan Huang, Huacan Chai, Chenyu Gong, Haoran Geng, Yuanjian Zhou, Ying Wen, Meng Fang, Muhao Chen, et al. Agentic web: Weaving the next web with AI agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21206, 2025 b

    2025 arXiv

  96. [105]

    Agent exchange: Shaping the future of AI agent economics

    Yingxuan Yang, Ying Wen, Jun Wang, and Weinan Zhang. Agent exchange: Shaping the future of AI agent economics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.03904, 2025 c

    2025 arXiv

  97. [106]

    Bridging solidity evolution gaps: An llm-enhanced approach for smart contract compilation error resolution

    Likai Ye, Mengliang Li, Dehai Zhao, Jiamou Sun, and Xiaoxue Ren. Bridging solidity evolution gaps: An llm-enhanced approach for smart contract compilation error resolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.10517, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  98. [107]

    Research on distributed node resource optimization mechanism for multi-agent systems combined with blockchain technology

    Zihang Yin, Bing Bai, Yang Liu, and Tongtong Cheng. Research on distributed node resource optimization mechanism for multi-agent systems combined with blockchain technology. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain), pp.\ 536--541. IEEE, 2024

    2024

  99. [108]

    A survey on agent workflow--status and future

    Chaojia Yu, Zihan Cheng, Hanwen Cui, Yishuo Gao, Zexu Luo, Yijin Wang, Hangbin Zheng, and Yong Zhao. A survey on agent workflow--status and future. In 2025 8th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD), pp.\ 770--781. IEEE, 2025

    2025

  100. [109]

    Adaptive incentive and resource allocation for blockchain-supported edge video streaming systems: A cooperative learning approach

    Shijing Yuan, Qingshi Zhou, Jie Li, Song Guo, Hongyang Chen, Chentao Wu, and Yang Yang. Adaptive incentive and resource allocation for blockchain-supported edge video streaming systems: A cooperative learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 24 0 (2): 0 539--556, 2025

    2025

  101. [110]

    Scalable constrained policy optimization for safe multi-agent reinforcement learning

    Lijun Zhang, Lin Li, Wei Wei, Huizhong Song, Yaodong Yang, and Jiye Liang. Scalable constrained policy optimization for safe multi-agent reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37: 0 138698--138730, 2024

    2024

  102. [111]

    Smartupdater: Enabling transparent, automated, and secure maintenance of stateful smart contracts

    Xiaoli Zhang, Yiqiao Song, Yuefeng Du, Chengjun Cai, Hongbing Cheng, Ke Xu, and Qi Li. Smartupdater: Enabling transparent, automated, and secure maintenance of stateful smart contracts. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 51 0 (4): 0 1266--1283, 2025 a

    2025

  103. [112]

    Webpilot: A versatile and autonomous multi-agent system for web task execution with strategic exploration

    Yao Zhang, Zijian Ma, Yunpu Ma, Zhen Han, Yu Wu, and Volker Tresp. Webpilot: A versatile and autonomous multi-agent system for web task execution with strategic exploration. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 39, pp.\ 23378--23386, 2025 b

    2025

  104. [113]

    Skillweaver: Web agents can self-improve by discovering and honing skills

    Boyuan Zheng, Michael Y Fatemi, Xiaolong Jin, Zora Zhiruo Wang, Apurva Gandhi, Yueqi Song, Yu Gu, Jayanth Srinivasa, Gaowen Liu, Graham Neubig, et al. Skillweaver: Web agents can self-improve by discovering and honing skills. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07079, 2025 a

    2025 arXiv

  105. [114]

    Gasagent: A multi-agent framework for automated gas optimization in smart contracts

    Jingyi Zheng, Zifan Peng, Yule Liu, Junfeng Wang, Yifan Liao, Wenhan Dong, and Xinlei He. Gasagent: A multi-agent framework for automated gas optimization in smart contracts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15761, 2025 b

    2025 arXiv

  106. [115]

    Leveraging zero knowledge proofs for blockchain-based identity sharing: A survey of advancements, challenges and opportunities

    Lu Zhou, Abebe Diro, Akanksha Saini, Shahriar Kaisar, and Pham Cong Hiep. Leveraging zero knowledge proofs for blockchain-based identity sharing: A survey of advancements, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 80: 0 103678, 2024

    2024

  107. [116]

    When foundation model meets federated learning: Motivations, challenges, and future directions

    Weiming Zhuang, Chen Chen, and Lingjuan Lyu. When foundation model meets federated learning: Motivations, challenges, and future directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15546, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  108. [117]

    Agent-as-a-judge: Evaluate agents with agents

    Mingchen Zhuge, Changsheng Zhao, Dylan Ashley, Wenyi Wang, Dmitrii Khizbullin, Yunyang Xiong, Zechun Liu, Ernie Chang, Raghuraman Krishnamoorthi, Yuandong Tian, et al. Agent-as-a-judge: Evaluate agents with agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10934, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  109. [118]

    Blocka2a: Towards secure and verifiable agent-to-agent interoperability

    Zhenhua Zou, Zhuotao Liu, Lepeng Zhao, and Qiuyang Zhan. Blocka2a: Towards secure and verifiable agent-to-agent interoperability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01332, 2025

    2025

  110. [119]

    The value proposition of blockchain technologies and its impact on digital platforms

    Aneesh Zutshi, Antonio Grilo, and Tahereh Nodehi. The value proposition of blockchain technologies and its impact on digital platforms. Computers & industrial engineering, 155: 0 107187, 2021

    2021

  111. [120]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.