LlamaV-o1: Rethinking Step-by-step Visual Reasoning in LLMs
read the original abstract
Reasoning is a fundamental capability for solving complex multi-step problems, particularly in visual contexts where sequential step-wise understanding is essential. Existing approaches lack a comprehensive framework for evaluating visual reasoning and do not emphasize step-wise problem-solving. To this end, we propose a comprehensive framework for advancing step-by-step visual reasoning in large language models (LMMs) through three key contributions. First, we introduce a visual reasoning benchmark specifically designed to evaluate multi-step reasoning tasks. The benchmark presents a diverse set of challenges with eight different categories ranging from complex visual perception to scientific reasoning with over 4k reasoning steps in total, enabling robust evaluation of LLMs' abilities to perform accurate and interpretable visual reasoning across multiple steps. Second, we propose a novel metric that assesses visual reasoning quality at the granularity of individual steps, emphasizing both correctness and logical coherence. The proposed metric offers deeper insights into reasoning performance compared to traditional end-task accuracy metrics. Third, we present a new multimodal visual reasoning model, named LlamaV-o1, trained using a multi-step curriculum learning approach, where tasks are progressively organized to facilitate incremental skill acquisition and problem-solving. The proposed LlamaV-o1 is designed for multi-step reasoning and learns step-by-step through a structured training paradigm. Extensive experiments show that our LlamaV-o1 outperforms existing open-source models and performs favorably against close-source proprietary models. Compared to the recent Llava-CoT, our LlamaV-o1 achieves an average score of 67.3 with an absolute gain of 3.8\% across six benchmarks while being 5 times faster during inference scaling. Our benchmark, model, and code are publicly available.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 15 Pith papers
-
Video-Holmes: Can MLLM Think Like Holmes for Complex Video Reasoning?
Video-Holmes benchmark shows top MLLMs achieve at most 45% accuracy on tasks needing integration of multiple clues from suspense films, unlike existing perception-focused tests.
-
R1-VL: Learning to Reason with Multimodal Large Language Models via Step-wise Group Relative Policy Optimization
R1-VL uses StepGRPO with rule-based StepRAR and StepRVR rewards to let MLLMs learn step-by-step reasoning beyond imitation of positive paths.
-
R1-Zero's "Aha Moment" in Visual Reasoning on a 2B Non-SFT Model
RL on Qwen2-VL-2B with SAT dataset produces R1-like reasoning and 59.47% CVBench accuracy, outperforming base model by ~30% and SFT by ~2%.
-
Reinforcing Dual-Path Reasoning in Spatial Vision Language Models
SR-REAL equips spatial VLMs with dual LOR and DTR reasoning paths trained via RL, achieving better benchmark performance through mutual reinforcement and generalization without per-task tuning.
-
From Seeing to Thinking: Decoupling Perception and Reasoning Improves Post-Training of Vision-Language Models
Staged post-training that first solidifies visual perception before visual and textual reasoning improves VLM accuracy and shortens reasoning traces on visual math and perception benchmarks.
-
OceanPile: A Large-Scale Multimodal Ocean Corpus for Foundation Models
OceanPile is a new multimodal corpus with unified data collection, instruction tuning set, and benchmark to train foundation models for ocean science.
-
Saliency-R1: Enforcing Interpretable and Faithful Vision-language Reasoning via Saliency-map Alignment Reward
Saliency-R1 uses a novel saliency map technique and GRPO with human bounding-box overlap as reward to improve VLM reasoning faithfulness and interpretability.
-
Fine-R1: Make Multi-modal LLMs Excel in Fine-Grained Visual Recognition by Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Fine-R1 uses chain-of-thought supervised fine-tuning on a structured FGVR reasoning dataset plus triplet augmented policy optimization to outperform general MLLMs and CLIP models on seen and unseen fine-grained catego...
-
Mitigating Visual Context Degradation in Large Multimodal Models: A Training-Free Decoupled Agentic Framework
DRP decouples reasoning from perception in LMMs by using an LLM reasoner to query an LMM observer for visual details as needed, reducing visual grounding loss.
-
OpenVLThinker: Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative SFT-RL Cycles
Iterative SFT-RL cycles enable a 7B LVLM to develop sophisticated visual chain-of-thought reasoning and improve performance on math and general reasoning benchmarks.
-
Mixture-of-Visual-Thoughts: Exploring Context-Adaptive Reasoning Mode Selection for General Visual Reasoning
MoVT unifies different visual reasoning modes in a single model and uses the AdaVaR two-stage framework with supervised cold-start and RL via AdaGRPO to enable context-adaptive mode selection, yielding consistent gain...
-
Vision-EKIPL: External Knowledge-Infused Policy Learning for Visual Reasoning
Vision-EKIPL injects high-quality actions from external models into RL training to expand exploration and raise the reasoning ceiling of MLLMs, reporting up to 5% gains on the Reason-RFT-CoT benchmark.
-
R1-Onevision: Advancing Generalized Multimodal Reasoning through Cross-Modal Formalization
R1-Onevision turns images into structured text for multimodal reasoning, trains on a custom dataset with RL, and claims SOTA results on an educational benchmark.
-
From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models
The survey organizes the shift of LLMs toward deliberate System 2 reasoning, covering model construction techniques, performance on math and coding benchmarks, and future research directions.
-
Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey
The paper provides the first comprehensive survey of multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning, including foundational concepts, a taxonomy of methodologies, application analyses, challenges, and future directions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.