Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

LLM-based Cognitive Models of Students with Misconceptions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.12294 v2 pith:UBTPHGA4 submitted 2024-10-16 cs.HC cs.CLcs.CYcs.LG

LLM-based Cognitive Models of Students with Misconceptions

classification cs.HC cs.CLcs.CYcs.LG
keywords studentmisconceptionsmodelscsmsllmssatisfyaccuratelyapplicable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Accurately modeling student cognition is crucial for developing effective AI-driven educational technologies. A key challenge is creating realistic student models that satisfy two essential properties: (1) accurately replicating specific misconceptions, and (2) correctly solving problems where these misconceptions are not applicable. This dual requirement reflects the complex nature of student understanding, where misconceptions coexist with correct knowledge. This paper investigates whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can be instruction-tuned to meet this dual requirement and effectively simulate student thinking in algebra. We introduce MalAlgoPy, a novel Python library that generates datasets reflecting authentic student solution patterns through a graph-based representation of algebraic problem-solving. Utilizing MalAlgoPy, we define and examine Cognitive Student Models (CSMs) - LLMs instruction tuned to faithfully emulate realistic student behavior. Our findings reveal that LLMs trained on misconception examples can efficiently learn to replicate errors. However, the training diminishes the model's ability to solve problems correctly, particularly for problem types where the misconceptions are not applicable, thus failing to satisfy second property of CSMs. We demonstrate that by carefully calibrating the ratio of correct to misconception examples in the training data - sometimes as low as 0.25 - it is possible to develop CSMs that satisfy both properties. Our insights enhance our understanding of AI-based student models and pave the way for effective adaptive learning systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Simulating Students or Sycophantic Problem Solving? On Misconception Faithfulness of LLM Simulators

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    LLM simulators exhibit near-zero selective response to targeted misconception feedback and behave sycophantically, but SFT and SFS-aligned RL improve this property.

  2. From Triggers to Emotions: A CPM-Grounded Appraisal Multi-Agent for Dynamic Emotional Evolution in Persona-Based Dialogue

    cs.MA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A CPM-grounded multi-agent system extracts dialogue triggers, appraises them on relevance/implication/coping/norms, and updates a persona’s latent multi-emotion state more coherently than standard prompting baselines.

  3. LLMs Struggle to Measure What Distinguishes Students of Different Proficiency Levels: A Study of Item Discrimination in Reading Comprehension Assessment

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LLMs achieve maximum Spearman correlations of 0.152 (direct) and 0.241 (response-based) with human item discrimination values, showing non-random but unreliable signal for distinguishing student proficiency.

  4. When Helpfulness Becomes Sycophancy: Sycophancy is a Boundary Failure Between Social Alignment and Epistemic Integrity in Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Sycophancy is a boundary failure between social alignment and epistemic integrity, captured by a three-condition framework plus taxonomy of targets, mechanisms, and severity.