ReAcTable: Enhancing ReAct for Table Question Answering
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved pith:V5JWWB5Mrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Table Question Answering (TQA) presents a substantial challenge at the intersection of natural language processing and data analytics. This task involves answering natural language (NL) questions on top of tabular data, demanding proficiency in logical reasoning, understanding of data semantics, and fundamental analytical capabilities. Due to its significance, a substantial volume of research has been dedicated to exploring a wide range of strategies aimed at tackling this challenge including approaches that leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) through in-context learning or Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting as well as approaches that train and fine-tune custom models. Nonetheless, a conspicuous gap exists in the research landscape, where there is limited exploration of how innovative foundational research, which integrates incremental reasoning with external tools in the context of LLMs, as exemplified by the ReAct paradigm, could potentially bring advantages to the TQA task. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap, by introducing ReAcTable (ReAct for Table Question Answering tasks), a framework inspired by the ReAct paradigm that is carefully enhanced to address the challenges uniquely appearing in TQA tasks such as interpreting complex data semantics, dealing with errors generated by inconsistent data and generating intricate data transformations. ReAcTable relies on external tools such as SQL and Python code executors, to progressively enhance the data by generating intermediate data representations, ultimately transforming it into a more accessible format for answering the questions with greater ease. We demonstrate that ReAcTable achieves remarkable performance even when compared to fine-tuned approaches. In particular, it outperforms the best prior result on the WikiTQ benchmark, achieving an accuracy of 68.0% without requiring training a new model or fine-tuning.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ExCyTIn-Bench: Evaluating LLM agents on Cyber Threat Investigation
ExCyTIn-Bench is the first benchmark of 7542 questions from Microsoft Sentinel threat investigation graphs, where the best LLM agent achieves a reward of 0.606.
-
When TableQA Meets Noise: A Dual Denoising Framework for Complex Questions and Large-scale Tables
EnoTab is a dual denoising framework for TableQA that performs evidence-based question denoising via semantic unit decomposition and evidence tree-guided table pruning with post-order rollback to improve performance o...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.