Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Order Matters: Agent-by-agent Policy Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.06205 v2 pith:V7GUTC5D submitted 2023-02-13 cs.AI cs.GTcs.LGcs.MA

classification cs.AIcs.GTcs.LGcs.MA
keywords textbfa2poagentimprovementmonotonicmulti-agentschemesequential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While multi-agent trust region algorithms have achieved great success empirically in solving coordination tasks, most of them, however, suffer from a non-stationarity problem since agents update their policies simultaneously. In contrast, a sequential scheme that updates policies agent-by-agent provides another perspective and shows strong performance. However, sample inefficiency and lack of monotonic improvement guarantees for each agent are still the two significant challenges for the sequential scheme. In this paper, we propose the \textbf{A}gent-by-\textbf{a}gent \textbf{P}olicy \textbf{O}ptimization (A2PO) algorithm to improve the sample efficiency and retain the guarantees of monotonic improvement for each agent during training. We justify the tightness of the monotonic improvement bound compared with other trust region algorithms. From the perspective of sequentially updating agents, we further consider the effect of agent updating order and extend the theory of non-stationarity into the sequential update scheme. To evaluate A2PO, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study on four benchmarks: StarCraftII, Multi-agent MuJoCo, Multi-agent Particle Environment, and Google Research Football full game scenarios. A2PO consistently outperforms strong baselines.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Low-Rank Agent-Specific Adaptation (LoRASA) for Multi-Agent Policy Learning

    cs.MA 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Per-agent low-rank adapters on a shared backbone let multi-agent policies specialize at a fraction of the memory cost of separate networks, with competitive benchmark performance.

  2. Multi-Agent Trust Region Policy Optimisation: A Joint Constraint Approach

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adaptive per-agent KL-threshold allocation via KKT (HATRPO-W) and greedy (HATRPO-G) improves HATRPO's final reward by over 22.5% in MARL benchmarks.

  3. SWIRL: A Staged Workflow for Interleaved Reinforcement Learning in Mobile GUI Control

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-agent RL workflow that interleaves single-agent updates, applied to mobile GUI control, achieves SOTA zero-shot performance and a +14.8 MATH500 gain.

Pith tools