REVIEW 2 cited by
Tokenisation is NP-Complete
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this work, we prove the NP-completeness of two variants of tokenisation, defined as the problem of compressing a dataset to at most $\delta$ symbols by either finding a vocabulary directly (direct tokenisation), or selecting a sequence of merge operations (bottom-up tokenisation).
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Causal Estimation of Tokenisation Bias
Using regression discontinuity, the paper shows that adding a subword to a tokenizer's vocabulary can raise the model's probability for that string by up to about 17 times in small models.
-
MultimodalHugs: Enabling Sign Language Processing in Hugging Face
MultimodalHugs provides a standardized TSV-based dataset format, modular processors, and Hugging Face integration to enable reproducible sign language and multimodal translation experiments.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.