REVIEW 1 cited by
NF-ULA: Langevin Monte Carlo with Normalizing Flow Prior for Imaging Inverse Problems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Bayesian methods for solving inverse problems are a powerful alternative to classical methods since the Bayesian approach offers the ability to quantify the uncertainty in the solution. In recent years, data-driven techniques for solving inverse problems have also been remarkably successful, due to their superior representation ability. In this work, we incorporate data-based models into a class of Langevin-based sampling algorithms for Bayesian inference in imaging inverse problems. In particular, we introduce NF-ULA (Normalizing Flow-based Unadjusted Langevin algorithm), which involves learning a normalizing flow (NF) as the image prior. We use NF to learn the prior because a tractable closed-form expression for the log prior enables the differentiation of it using autograd libraries. Our algorithm only requires a normalizing flow-based generative network, which can be pre-trained independently of the considered inverse problem and the forward operator. We perform theoretical analysis by investigating the well-posedness and non-asymptotic convergence of the resulting NF-ULA algorithm. The efficacy of the proposed NF-ULA algorithm is demonstrated in various image restoration problems such as image deblurring, image inpainting, and limited-angle X-ray computed tomography (CT) reconstruction. NF-ULA is found to perform better than competing methods for severely ill-posed inverse problems.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
ControlMambaIR: Conditional Controls with State-Space Model for Image Restoration
A diffusion image restoration model with a Mamba condition network reports low LPIPS/FID on several benchmarks, but the PSNR losses and internal inconsistencies undermine the stated performance claims.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.