REVIEW 13 cited by
Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiences
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In recent years, the field of explainable AI (XAI) has produced a vast collection of algorithms, providing a useful toolbox for researchers and practitioners to build XAI applications. With the rich application opportunities, explainability is believed to have moved beyond a demand by data scientists or researchers to comprehend the models they develop, to an essential requirement for people to trust and adopt AI deployed in numerous domains. However, explainability is an inherently human-centric property and the field is starting to embrace human-centered approaches. Human-computer interaction (HCI) research and user experience (UX) design in this area are becoming increasingly important. In this chapter, we begin with a high-level overview of the technical landscape of XAI algorithms, then selectively survey our own and other recent HCI works that take human-centered approaches to design, evaluate, and provide conceptual and methodological tools for XAI. We ask the question "what are human-centered approaches doing for XAI" and highlight three roles that they play in shaping XAI technologies by helping navigate, assess and expand the XAI toolbox: to drive technical choices by users' explainability needs, to uncover pitfalls of existing XAI methods and inform new methods, and to provide conceptual frameworks for human-compatible XAI.
Forward citations
Cited by 13 Pith papers
-
Show Me the Work: Fact-Checkers' Requirements for Explainable Automated Fact-Checking
Fact-checkers want automated fact-checking explanations that trace the reasoning path, cite checkable evidence, and clearly flag uncertainty and information gaps, not just confidence scores.
-
XPlainVerse: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Explainable Deepfake Detection
A million-scale deepfake benchmark with Edit-Check filtering, dual expert/lay explanations, and EntityScore/EvidenceScore shows fine-tuned detectors collapse under generator shift while surface fluency remains.
-
Secure human oversight of AI: Threat modeling in a socio-technical context
Human oversight of AI is itself an attackable component; the paper catalogs how cyberattacks can undermine the people, channels, and system, plus hardening strategies.
-
Designing Effective AI Explanations for Misinformation Detection: A Comparative Study of Content, Social, and Combined Explanations
Aligned content and social explanations improve misinformation detection accuracy, while misaligned explanations offer no accuracy benefit over no explanation.
-
GenTune: Toward Traceable Prompts to Improve Controllability of Image Refinement in Environment Design
GenTune improves AI image refinement by tracing image regions back to prompt labels and allowing element-level, semantic-guided edits.
-
ADEPTS: A Capability Framework for Human-Centered Agent Design
ADEPTS defines six core agent capabilities and progressive tiers meant to unify how teams across UX, engineering, and policy discuss and measure human-centered AI agents.
-
Mind the XAI Gap: A Human-Centered LLM Framework for Democratizing Explainable AI
An in-context LLM framework that produces dual expert and non-expert explanations, evaluated on well-being clustering with a user study and LIME-alignment metrics.
-
Importance of User Control in Data-Centric Steering for Healthcare Experts
Healthcare experts who manually adjusted training data improved a diabetes prediction model more than those using automated corrections, without losing trust or understanding.
-
Fostering Appropriate Reliance on Large Language Models: The Role of Explanations, Sources, and Inconsistencies
Explanations increase user reliance on both correct and incorrect LLM answers, while sources and inconsistent explanations reduce overreliance on incorrect answers in a controlled experiment.
-
Beyond Explainable AI (XAI): An Overdue Paradigm Shift and Post-XAI Research Directions
Current XAI methods for DNNs and LLMs rest on paradoxes and false assumptions that demand a paradigm shift to verification protocols, scientific foundations, context-aware design, and faithful model analysis rather th...
-
Towards a Humanized Social-Media Ecosystem: AI-Augmented HCI Design Patterns for Safety, Agency & Well-Being
Five browser-side design patterns (rewriter, integrity meter, feed curator, micro-withdrawal, recovery mode) aim to give users control over social feeds through an explainable AI intermediary, with evaluation still pending.
-
AIAP: A No-Code Workflow Builder for Non-Experts with Natural Language and Multi-Agent Collaboration
A no-code workflow builder with hidden multi-agent decomposition yields positive usability scores, but the study does not support the claim of significant improvement.
-
Human-Centered Explainability in Interactive Information Systems: A Survey
A systematic review of 100 empirical user studies synthesizes explainability research into five conceptual dimensions, a design classification, and six measurement categories.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.