pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11028 · v1 · pith:VTHOBUCXnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · 🧮 math.DS

Logistic Gene Regulatory Networks: A Modelling Framework Beyond Hill Functions

Ismail Belgacem This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 11:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.DS
keywords gene regulatory networksBoolean networkslogistic functionsdifferential equationsrecovery theoremsteady statesHill functionscell cycle model
0
0 comments X

The pith

A product-of-logistics translation turns Boolean gene rules into continuous models where every Boolean steady state becomes an exponentially stable equilibrium for steep enough responses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a method to convert Boolean logic descriptions of gene regulation into systems of differential equations. It replaces Hill functions with a recursive combination of logistic activation and repression terms that always produces values between zero and one while keeping a positive basal production rate. The central theorem shows that this translation recovers all fixed points of the original Boolean network as stable equilibria of the continuous system once the logistic curves become sufficiently steep. The approach is applied to small motifs and an eleven-gene cell-cycle model, where it reproduces the expected limit cycle without introducing artificial zero-production states. Because the construction is purely structural, it works on any existing Boolean model.

Core claim

The central claim is a recovery theorem: every steady state of the Boolean network reappears, for sufficiently steep response, as an exponentially stable equilibrium of the continuous model, so the translation provably refines rather than distorts the Boolean analysis.

What carries the argument

The recursive De Morgan product of increasing and decreasing logistic functions that converts an arbitrary Boolean rule into a continuous regulatory function confined to the unit interval.

If this is right

  • The continuous models are globally well-posed and forward-invariant.
  • The negative-feedback two-gene oscillator is globally asymptotically stable.
  • The toggle switch admits an explicit closed-form bistability threshold expressed in positive concentrations.
  • Automatic translation of the eleven-gene Traynard network produces a sustained limit cycle that matches the Boolean cyclic attractor.
  • The translation supports exact feedback linearisation for control of the resulting ODE systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same structural translation could be applied to any Boolean model in the literature without rewriting the logical rules.
  • Because thresholds remain positive concentrations, parameter fitting to experimental data becomes more direct than in weighted-sum logistic models.
  • The recovery property suggests that Boolean attractors can serve as reliable initial guesses for numerical continuation in the continuous system.

Load-bearing premise

Regulatory functions are constructed via a recursive De Morgan product of logistic functions that confines every function to the unit interval while retaining a strictly positive basal rate.

What would settle it

Observe whether, as the steepness parameter of the logistic functions tends to infinity, every Boolean steady state fails to become an equilibrium or loses exponential stability in the resulting ODE system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11028 by Ismail Belgacem.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Architecture of a two-gene negative feedback loop. Gene A activates gene B (blue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Temporal evolution of the two-gene oscillator system ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Logistic genetic toggle switch (5) integrated in R, with symmetric parameters κ = 10, γ = 1, θ = 5. (a) Bistable phase portrait at λ = 2: nullclines x˙ 1 = 0 (blue) and x˙ 2 = 0 (red), the two stable nodes (filled circles), the saddle (cross), and trajectories from a grid of initial conditions, coloured by the basin they reach. (b) Bifurcation diagram: the equilibrium coordinate x ∗ 1 against the steepness… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temporal evolution of the 11-gene Traynard cell-cycle logistic ODE system over [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The two-gene oscillator of Section 3.1 (x1(0) = x2(0) = 1, integration as in Fig￾ure 2) under four formulations of the same circuit, all drawn on a common scale. (a) Hill functions (32), slope-matched via n = λθ (n1 = 12, n2 = 9). (b) Product-of-logistics (this work), equation (31), λ = 3. (c) Samuilik weighted sum (33) under the prescribed shared thresholds θi = 1 2 P j wij (i.e. θ12 = − 1 2 , θ21 = + 1 2… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of the decreasing logistic functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Boolean networks model gene regulatory networks, but extracting quantitative dynamics requires translating their logical rules into differential equations, and the sigmoidal kernel chosen carries direct biological consequences. The near-universal choice, the Hill function, sets production to exactly zero when an activator is absent, creating a spurious absorbing off-state with no biological counterpart. We develop a product-of-logistics framework in which increasing logistic functions represent activation, decreasing logistic functions represent repression, and a recursive De Morgan product formula translates an arbitrary Boolean rule into a continuous regulatory function. The translation is automatic, confines every regulatory function to the unit interval, and retains a strictly positive basal rate. Our central result is a recovery theorem: every steady state of the Boolean network reappears, for sufficiently steep response, as an exponentially stable equilibrium of the continuous model, so the translation provably refines rather than distorts the Boolean analysis. We establish global well-posedness, forward invariance, and an explicit Lipschitz constant, and prove, for the two canonical two-gene motifs, global asymptotic stability of the negative-feedback oscillator and a closed-form bistability threshold for the toggle switch. Every threshold remains a positive, measurable concentration, unlike weighted-sum logistic formulations that place repressor thresholds at meaningless negative values. The eleven-gene Traynard mammalian cell-cycle network is translated automatically: in the proliferative regime its trajectories settle onto a sustained limit cycle reproducing the Boolean cyclic attractor. Because it is purely structural, the translation applies unchanged to existing Boolean models and supports exact feedback linearisation for control.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a product-of-logistics framework to translate arbitrary Boolean gene regulatory networks into continuous ODEs. Increasing and decreasing logistic functions are combined via a recursive De Morgan product to produce regulatory functions that map into (0,1] while retaining a strictly positive basal production rate. The central result is a recovery theorem asserting that every Boolean steady state reappears as an exponentially stable equilibrium of the continuous system for sufficiently large steepness. The authors prove global well-posedness, forward invariance of the unit hypercube, and an explicit Lipschitz constant; they derive closed-form results for the negative-feedback oscillator and toggle-switch motifs; and they show that the automatically translated Traynard 11-gene cell-cycle network produces a sustained limit cycle matching the Boolean cyclic attractor. The translation is purely structural and therefore applies directly to existing Boolean models.

Significance. If the recovery theorem and supporting global-existence results hold, the framework supplies a mathematically rigorous, biologically preferable alternative to Hill-function translations that avoids spurious zero-production states and negative thresholds. The explicit Lipschitz constant, closed-form motif analysis, and automatic applicability to existing Boolean models are concrete strengths that facilitate both analysis and control design. The 11-gene example demonstrates scalability. These features position the work as a useful bridge between discrete logical models and quantitative dynamical systems in systems biology.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract refers to the steepness parameter only descriptively ('sufficiently steep response'); the first appearance of its symbol and the precise statement of the recovery theorem should include an explicit lower bound or scaling relation so that readers can immediately locate the quantitative content of the main result.
  2. In the section presenting the 11-gene Traynard network, the statement that trajectories 'settle onto a sustained limit cycle' appears to rest on numerical integration; the integration scheme, step-size control, and tolerance used to confirm the periodic orbit should be stated explicitly for reproducibility.
  3. A short illustrative example (e.g., the Boolean rule for a single activator AND repressor) showing the recursive De Morgan construction step-by-step would clarify the automatic translation procedure before the general theorem is stated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and constructive review of our manuscript. The recommendation for minor revision is appreciated, and we note that no specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper defines a structural translation from Boolean rules to continuous regulatory functions via recursive De Morgan products of logistic functions, then states and proves a recovery theorem showing Boolean steady states reappear as exponentially stable equilibria for large steepness. This theorem, along with well-posedness, invariance, and explicit results for two-gene motifs, is presented as independently derived content rather than reducing by construction to the input Boolean network or to any fitted parameters. No self-citations, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or renamings of known results appear as load-bearing steps in the described derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the choice of logistic functions and the De Morgan product construction; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • steepness parameter
    The response steepness must be taken sufficiently large for the recovery theorem to apply, though no specific fitting procedure is described.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Logistic functions suitably model graded activation and repression while ensuring positive basal expression
    Invoked to replace Hill functions and guarantee strictly positive basal rate.
  • standard math Recursive application of De Morgan laws yields a valid continuous regulatory function for any Boolean rule
    Used to define the product formula that translates arbitrary Boolean rules.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5795 in / 1479 out tokens · 34240 ms · 2026-06-27T11:19:31.708212+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Traynard, A

    P. Traynard, A. Fauré, F. Fages, D. Thieffry, Logical model specification aided by model-checking techniques: application to the mammalian cell cycle regulation., Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 32 (2016) i772–i780. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw457

    work page doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw457 2016

  2. [2]

    C.Biane, F.Delaplace, Causalreasoningonbooleancontrolnetworksbased on abduction: theory andapplication tocancerdrug discovery, IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics 16 (2018) 1574– 1585

    2018

  3. [3]

    Sahin, H

    Ö. Sahin, H. Fröhlich, C. Löbke, U. Korf, S. Burmester, M. Majety, J. Mat- tern, I. Schupp, C. Chaouiya, D. Thieffry, et al., Modeling erbb receptor- regulated g1/s transition to find novel targets for de novo trastuzumab resistance, BMC systems biology 3 (2009) 1

    2009

  4. [4]

    Verlingue, A

    L. Verlingue, A. Dugourd, G. Stoll, E. Barillot, L. Calzone, A. Londoño- Vallejo, A comprehensive approach to the molecular determinants of lifes- pan using a boolean model of geroconversion., Aging cell 15 (2016) 1018–

    2016

  5. [5]

    doi:10.1111/acel.12504

    work page doi:10.1111/acel.12504

  6. [6]

    D. P. A. Cohen, L. Martignetti, S. Robine, E. Barillot, A. Zinovyev, L. Cal- zone, Mathematical modelling of molecular pathways enabling tumour cell invasion and migration., PLoS computational biology 11 (2015) e1004571. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004571. 47

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004571 2015

  7. [7]

    Enciso, H

    J. Enciso, H. Mayani, L. Mendoza, R. Pelayo, Modeling the pro- inflammatory tumor microenvironment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia predicts a breakdown of hematopoietic-mesenchymal communication net- works., Frontiers in physiology 7 (2016) 349. doi:10.3389/fphys.2016. 00349

    work page doi:10.3389/fphys.2016 2016

  8. [8]

    Albert, H

    R. Albert, H. G. Othmer, The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in drosophila melanogaster, Journal of theoretical biology 223 (2003) 1–18

    2003

  9. [9]

    Belgacem, J.-L

    I. Belgacem, J.-L. Gouzé, Global stability of full open reversible Michaelis– Menten reactions, in: 8th IFAC Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes (ADCHEM), Elsevier, 2012, pp. 591–596. doi:10.3182/ 20120710-4-SG-2026.00039

    arXiv 2012

  10. [10]

    Belgacem, J.-L

    I. Belgacem, J.-L. Gouzé, Global stability of enzymatic chain of full re- versible Michaelis–Menten reactions, Acta Biotheoretica 61 (2013) 425–436. doi:10.1007/s10441-013-9195-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10441-013-9195-3 2013

  11. [11]

    Belgacem, J.-L

    I. Belgacem, J.-L. Gouzé, Mathematical study of the global dynamics of a concave gene expression model, in: 22nd Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED’14), IEEE, 2014, pp. 1341–1346. doi:10. 1109/MED.2014.6961562

    arXiv 2014

  12. [12]

    Belgacem and J.-L

    I. Belgacem, J.-L. Gouzé, Stability analysis and reduction of gene transcrip- tion models, in: 2013 IEEE 52nd Annual Conference on Decision and Con- trol (CDC), IEEE, 2013, pp. 2691–2696. doi:10.1109/CDC.2013.6760289

    work page doi:10.1109/cdc.2013.6760289 2013

  13. [13]

    Belgacem, J.-L

    I. Belgacem, J.-L. Gouzé, Analysis and reduction of transcription– translation coupled models for gene expression, in: 12th IFAC Sympo- sium on Computer Applications in Biotechnology (CAB), Elsevier, 2013, pp. 42–47. doi:10.3182/20131216-3-IN-2044.00012

    work page doi:10.3182/20131216-3-in-2044.00012 2013

  14. [14]

    Belgacem, E

    I. Belgacem, E. Grac, D. Ropers, J.-L. Gouzé, A coupled transcription– translation mathematical model of RNA polymerase, in: 21st International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems (MTNS 2014), 2014, pp. 1383–1386. ISBN 978-90-367-6321-9

    2014

  15. [15]

    Belgacem, E

    I. Belgacem, E. Grac, D. Ropers, J.-L. Gouzé, Stability analysis of a re- duced transcription–translation model of RNA polymerase, in: 2014 IEEE 53rd Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), IEEE, 2014, pp. 3924–3929. doi:10.1109/CDC.2014.7039999

    work page doi:10.1109/cdc.2014.7039999 2014

  16. [16]

    Belgacem, S

    I. Belgacem, S. Casagranda, E. Grac, D. Ropers, J.-L. Gouzé, Re- duction and stability analysis of a transcription–translation model of RNA polymerase, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 80 (2018) 294–318. doi:10.1007/s11538-017-0372-4. 48

    work page doi:10.1007/s11538-017-0372-4 2018

  17. [17]

    Gouzé, R.Edwards, Control ofnegative feedback loopsin genetic networks, in: 2020 59th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), IEEE, 2020, pp

    I.Belgacem, J.-L. Gouzé, R.Edwards, Control ofnegative feedback loopsin genetic networks, in: 2020 59th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), IEEE, 2020, pp. 5098–5105

    2020

  18. [18]

    Chambon, I

    L. Chambon, I. Belgacem, J.-L. Gouzé, Qualitative control of undesired os- cillations in a genetic negative feedback loop with uncertain measurements, Automatica 112 (2020) 108642

    2020

  19. [19]

    Farcot, S

    E. Farcot, S. Best, R. Edwards, I. Belgacem, X. Xu, P. Gill, Chaos in a ring circuit, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 29 (2019) 043103

    2019

  20. [20]

    Belgacem, R

    I. Belgacem, R. Edwards, E. Farcot, Computer-aided analysis of high- dimensional Glass networks: periodicity, chaos, and bifurcations in a ring circuit, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science (2025). doi:10.1063/5.0243955

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0243955 2025

  21. [21]

    Becskei, L

    A. Becskei, L. Serrano, Engineering stability in gene networks by autoreg- ulation, Nature 405 (2000) 590–593

    2000

  22. [22]

    Lipshtat, A

    A. Lipshtat, A. Loinger, N. Q. Balaban, O. Biham, Genetic toggle switch without cooperative binding, Physical review letters 96 (2006) 188101

    2006

  23. [23]

    M. J. Weickert, S. Adhya, The galactose regulon of escherichia coli, Molec- ular microbiology 10 (1993) 245–251

    1993

  24. [24]

    P. G. Gottschalk, J. R. Dunn, The five-parameter logistic: a characteriza- tion and comparison with the four-parameter logistic, Analytical biochem- istry 343 (2005) 54–65

    2005

  25. [25]

    Reeve, J

    R. Reeve, J. R. Turner, Pharmacodynamic models: parameterizing the hill equation, michaelis-menten, the logistic curve, and relationships among these models, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics 23 (2013) 648–661

    2013

  26. [26]

    Santillán, On the use of the hill functions in mathematical models of gene regulatory networks, Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena 3 (2008) 85–97

    M. Santillán, On the use of the hill functions in mathematical models of gene regulatory networks, Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena 3 (2008) 85–97

    2008

  27. [27]

    Samuilik, F

    I. Samuilik, F. Sadyrbaev, D. Ogorelova, Mathematical modeling of three- dimensional genetic regulatory networks using logistic and gompertz func- tions, WSEAS Transactions on systems and control 17 (2022) 101107

    2022

  28. [28]

    T. S. Gardner, C. R. Cantor, J. J. Collins, Construction of a genetic toggle switch in escherichia coli, Nature 403 (2000) 339–342

    2000

  29. [29]

    I. Belgacem, Numerical reliability of logistic gene regulatory network mod- els: Preventing expression shutdown and robust integration of boolean- derived ODE systems, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (sub- mitted) (2026). 49

    2026

  30. [30]

    Bernot, J.-P

    G. Bernot, J.-P. Comet, A. Richard, M. Chaves, J.-L. Gouzé, F. Dayan, Modeling and analysis of gene regulatory networks, in: F. Cazals, P. Ko- rnprobst (Eds.), Modeling in Computational Biology and Biomedicine: A Multidisciplinary Endeavor, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 47–80

    2012

  31. [31]

    Polynikis, S

    A. Polynikis, S. Hogan, M. di Bernardo, Comparing different ode modelling approaches for gene regulatory networks, Journal of theoretical biology 261 (2009) 511–530

    2009

  32. [32]

    Bottani, R

    S. Bottani, R. A. Veitia, Hill function-based models of transcriptional switches: impact of specific, nonspecific, functional and nonfunctional bind- ing, Biological Reviews 92 (2017) 953–963

    2017

  33. [33]

    H. Kim, E. Gelenbe, Stochastic gene expression modeling with hill function for switch-like gene responses, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 9 (2011) 973–979

    2011

  34. [34]

    E. M. Ozbudak, M. Thattai, H. N. Lim, B. I. Shraiman, A. Van Oudenaar- den, Multistability in the lactose utilization network of escherichia coli, Nature 427 (2004) 737–740

    2004

  35. [35]

    Madar, E

    D. Madar, E. Dekel, A. Bren, U. Alon, Negative auto-regulation increases the input dynamic-range of the arabinose system of escherichia coli, BMC systems biology 5 (2011) 111

    2011

  36. [36]

    Oehler, M

    S. Oehler, M. Amouyal, P. Kolkhof, B. von Wilcken-Bergmann, B. Müller- Hill, Qualityandpositionofthethreelacoperatorsofe.colidefineefficiency of repression., The EMBO journal 13 (1994) 3348–3355

    1994

  37. [37]

    M. B. Elowitz, S. Leibler, A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators, Nature 403 (2000) 335

    2000

  38. [38]

    Belgacem, Exploring logistic functions as robust alternatives to hill func- tions in genetic network modeling, 2025

    I. Belgacem, Exploring logistic functions as robust alternatives to hill func- tions in genetic network modeling, 2025. URL:https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2512.14325.arXiv:2512.14325

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Abeliovich, An empirical extremum principle for the hill coefficient in ligand-protein interactions showing negative cooperativity, Biophysical journal 89 (2005) 76–79

    H. Abeliovich, An empirical extremum principle for the hill coefficient in ligand-protein interactions showing negative cooperativity, Biophysical journal 89 (2005) 76–79

    2005

  40. [40]

    J. E. Marsden, M. McCracken, The Hopf Bifurcation and Its Applications, volume 19 ofApplied Mathematical Sciences, Springer-Verlag, New York,

  41. [41]

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-6374-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-6374-6

  42. [42]

    Y. A. Kuznetsov, Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, volume 112 of Applied Mathematical Sciences, 3 ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3978-7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3978-7 2004

  43. [43]

    Blanchini, S

    F. Blanchini, S. Miani, Set-Theoretic Methods in Control, Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 2008. doi:10.1007/978-0-8176-4606-6. 50

    work page doi:10.1007/978-0-8176-4606-6 2008

  44. [44]

    Belgacem, Sustained limit cycles in the logistic two-gene genetic oscil- lator: A delay-driven Hopf bifurcation, 2026

    I. Belgacem, Sustained limit cycles in the logistic two-gene genetic oscil- lator: A delay-driven Hopf bifurcation, 2026. URL:https://arxiv.org/ abs/2605.23722.arXiv:2605.23722

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    I. Belgacem, Beyond linear additive and hill functions: A general logistic reformulation of delay-coupled gene regulatory networks with equilibrium analysis, Hopf bifurcation, and Lipschitz stability, 2026. URL:https:// arxiv.org/abs/2604.26810.arXiv:2604.26810

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, volume 1, 3 ed., Wiley, New York, 1968

    W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, volume 1, 3 ed., Wiley, New York, 1968

    1968

  47. [47]

    D. M. Wittmann, J. Krumsiek, J. Saez-Rodriguez, D. A. Lauffenburger, S. Klamt, F. J. Theis, Transforming boolean models to continuous models: methodology and application to t-cell receptor signaling, BMC systems biology 3 (2009) 98

    2009

  48. [48]

    A. A. Nielsen, B. S. Der, J. Shin, P. Vaidyanathan, V. Paralanov, E. A. Strychalski, D. Ross, D. Densmore, C. A. Voigt, Genetic circuit design automation, Science 352 (2016) aac7341

    2016

  49. [49]

    Hartman, Ordinary Differential Equations, volume 38 ofClassics in Ap- plied Mathematics, 2 ed., Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2002

    P. Hartman, Ordinary Differential Equations, volume 38 ofClassics in Ap- plied Mathematics, 2 ed., Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2002

    2002

  50. [50]

    Sadyrbaev, I

    F. Sadyrbaev, I. Samuilik, V. Sengileyev, On modelling of genetic regula- tory networks, WSEAS Transactions on Electronics 12 (2021) 73

    2021

  51. [51]

    Kozlovska, F

    O. Kozlovska, F. Sadyrbaev, In search of chaos in genetic systems, Chaos Theory and Applications 6 (2024) 13–18

    2024

  52. [52]

    Samuilik, F

    I. Samuilik, F. Sadyrbaev, Genetic engineering–construction of a network of arbitrary dimension with periodic attractor, Vibroengineering Procedia 46 (2022) 67–72

    2022

  53. [53]

    Sadyrbaev, V

    F. Sadyrbaev, V. Sengileyev, A. Silvans, On coexistence of inhibition and activation in genetic regulatory networks, in: International Conference on Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics 2021, ICNAAM 2021, AIP PRESS, 2023, p. 160005

    2021

  54. [54]

    S. S. Somathilaka, S. Balasubramaniam, D. P. Martins, X. Li, Revealing gene regulation-based neural network computing in bacteria, Biophysical Reports 3 (2023)

    2023

  55. [55]

    Kozlovska, F

    O. Kozlovska, F. Sadyrbaev, Modeling networks of four elements, Compu- tation 13 (2025) 123

    2025

  56. [56]

    Kozlovska, F

    O. Kozlovska, F. Sadyrbaev, Models of genetic networks with given prop- erties, WSEAS Transactions on Computer Research 10 (2022) 43–49. 51

    2022

  57. [57]

    Bintu, N

    L. Bintu, N. E. Buchler, H. G. Garcia, U. Gerland, T. Hwa, J. Kondev, R. Phillips, Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: models, Current opinion in genetics & development 15 (2005) 116–124

    2005

  58. [58]

    M. Acar, A. Becskei, A. Van Oudenaarden, Enhancement of cellular mem- ory by reducing stochastic transitions, Nature 435 (2005) 228–232

    2005

  59. [59]

    Huang, Z

    L. Huang, Z. Yuan, P. Liu, T. Zhou, Effects of promoter leakage on dy- namics of gene expression, BMC systems biology 9 (2015) 16. doi:10.1186/ s12918-015-0157-z

    2015

  60. [60]

    Jacob, J

    F. Jacob, J. Monod, Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins, Journal of molecular biology 3 (1961) 318–356

    1961

  61. [61]

    G. K. Ackers, A. D. Johnson, M. A. Shea, Quantitative model for gene reg- ulation by lambda phage repressor., Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 79 (1982) 1129–1133

    1982

  62. [62]

    Z. Zuo, G. D. Stormo, High-resolution specificity from dna sequencing highlights alternative modes of lac repressor binding, Genetics 198 (2014) 1329–1343

    2014

  63. [63]

    C. M. Falcon, K. S. Matthews, Operator dna sequence variation enhances high affinity binding by hinge helix mutants of lactose repressor protein, Biochemistry 39 (2000) 11074–11083

    2000

  64. [64]

    Kumar, S

    S. Kumar, S. Anastassov, S. K. Aoki, J. Falkenstein, C.-H. Chang, T. Frei, P. Buchmann, P. Argast, M. Khammash, Diya–a universal light illumina- tion platform for multiwell plate cultures, Iscience 26 (2023)

    2023

  65. [65]

    Razo-Mejia, S

    M. Razo-Mejia, S. L. Barnes, N. M. Belliveau, G. Chure, T. Einav, M. Lewis, R. Phillips, Tuning transcriptional regulation through signaling: a predictive theory of allosteric induction, Cell systems 6 (2018) 456–469

    2018

  66. [66]

    Sawlekar, F

    R. Sawlekar, F. Montefusco, V. Kulkarni, D. G. Bates, Biomolecular imple- mentation of a quasi sliding mode feedback controller based on dna strand displacement reactions, in: 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), IEEE, 2015, pp. 949–952

    2015

  67. [67]

    Del Vecchio, R

    D. Del Vecchio, R. M. Murray, Biomolecular Feedback Systems, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2015

    2015

  68. [68]

    Lugagne, C

    J.-B. Lugagne, C. M. Blassick, M. J. Dunlop, Deep model predictive control of gene expression in thousands of single cells, Nature Communications 15 (2024) 2148

    2024

  69. [69]

    Faquir, M

    H. Faquir, M. Pájaro, I. Otero-Muras, A computational framework for optimalandmodelpredictivecontrolofstochasticgeneregulatorynetworks, IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (2025). 52

    2025

  70. [70]

    S.A.Kauffman, Metabolicstabilityandepigenesisinrandomlyconstructed genetic nets, Journal of theoretical biology 22 (1969) 437–467

    1969

  71. [71]

    B. P. Ingalls, Mathematical Modeling in Systems Biology: An Introduction, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2013. 53

    2013