REVIEW 7 cited by
EgoSchema: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Very Long-form Video Language Understanding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce EgoSchema, a very long-form video question-answering dataset, and benchmark to evaluate long video understanding capabilities of modern vision and language systems. Derived from Ego4D, EgoSchema consists of over 5000 human curated multiple choice question answer pairs, spanning over 250 hours of real video data, covering a very broad range of natural human activity and behavior. For each question, EgoSchema requires the correct answer to be selected between five given options based on a three-minute-long video clip. While some prior works have proposed video datasets with long clip lengths, we posit that merely the length of the video clip does not truly capture the temporal difficulty of the video task that is being considered. To remedy this, we introduce temporal certificate sets, a general notion for capturing the intrinsic temporal understanding length associated with a broad range of video understanding tasks & datasets. Based on this metric, we find EgoSchema to have intrinsic temporal lengths over 5.7x longer than the second closest dataset and 10x to 100x longer than any other video understanding dataset. Further, our evaluation of several current state-of-the-art video and language models shows them to be severely lacking in long-term video understanding capabilities. Even models with several billions of parameters achieve QA accuracy less than 33% (random is 20%) on the EgoSchema multi-choice question answering task, while humans achieve about 76% accuracy. We posit that \name{}{}, with its long intrinsic temporal structures and diverse complexity, would serve as a valuable evaluation probe for developing effective long-term video understanding systems in the future. Data and Zero-shot model evaluation code are open-sourced for both public and commercial use under the Ego4D license at http://egoschema.github.io
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
Movie Facts and Fibs (MF$^2$): A Benchmark for Long Movie Understanding
MF2 evaluates long-movie understanding by asking models to classify fact/fib claim pairs; the best model trails humans by 23.5 points in pairwise accuracy.
-
CRAFT: Compression via Recursive Adaptive Fusion of Video Tokens for Vision-Language Models
CRAFT recursively merges video tokens with training-free similarity selection plus learnable gated fusion, retaining ~97% of average accuracy at 8x compression across six benchmarks.
-
ObjectStream: Latent Objects as Memory Anchors for Streaming Video Understanding
Training-free latent-object memory anchors let frozen Video-LLMs retain object histories under a tight token budget and improve streaming and long-video QA.
-
MEMORA: Embodied Action Memory from Egocentric Videos for Reasoning and Planning
A typed, editable memory built from egocentric video improves memory-grounded question answering and out-of-distribution robot planning over flat-text and graph baselines.
-
CausalVQA: A Physically Grounded Causal Reasoning Benchmark for Video Models
CausalVQA provides 793 paired real-video causal reasoning questions on which the best multimodal model scores 61.66% versus 84.78% for humans, with the largest gaps on anticipation and hypothetical questions.
-
LaCo: Efficient Layer-wise Compression of Visual Tokens for Multimodal Large Language Models
Inserting a pixel-shuffle plus residual patch-merge layer inside the vision encoder compresses visual tokens more efficiently than post-encoder compression, at modest accuracy cost.
-
Infinite Video Understanding
The paper argues that video understanding research should aim at processing streams of arbitrary, unbounded duration and outlines the challenges, directions, and metrics needed.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.