Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey on Self-Supervised Representation Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.11455 v1 pith:WCNX3ZN2 submitted 2023-08-22 cs.LG cs.AIeess.IVstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIeess.IVstat.ML
keywords learningmethodsrepresentationssurveyfieldrepresentationtasksallow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Learning meaningful representations is at the heart of many tasks in the field of modern machine learning. Recently, a lot of methods were introduced that allow learning of image representations without supervision. These representations can then be used in downstream tasks like classification or object detection. The quality of these representations is close to supervised learning, while no labeled images are needed. This survey paper provides a comprehensive review of these methods in a unified notation, points out similarities and differences of these methods, and proposes a taxonomy which sets these methods in relation to each other. Furthermore, our survey summarizes the most-recent experimental results reported in the literature in form of a meta-study. Our survey is intended as a starting point for researchers and practitioners who want to dive into the field of representation learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Better Features Mean Greater Risks: The Performance-Privacy Trade-Off in Contrastive Learning

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Membership inference against contrastive encoders is more accurate for larger frameworks and backbones, and a lightweight likelihood attack based on feature-vector p-norms matches or beats prior attacks with fewer queries.

Pith tools