Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 47 references

Weighted Besov Spaces on Homogeneous Lie Groups and Applications to Parabolic Anderson Models

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read One pair of compactly supported test functions carries the entire weighted Besov calculus on every homogeneous Lie group, and the same machinery proves well-posedness for parabolic Anderson models in the Young and first singular regimes.

desk verdict The paper's framework is genuinely useful, but the proof of the Young multiplication theorem contains an invalid convolution-pointwise-product exchange that the SPDE applications rely on; it deserves a serious referee but not acceptance as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13392 v1 pith:WUQVX6MD submitted 2026-08-13 math.AP math.FAmath.PR

Harprit Singh This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.FAmath.PR MSC 46E3535H2060H1543A80
keywords BesovspaceshomogeneousLiegroupsweightedfunctionmultiscalecharacterizationparabolicAndersonmodelRocklandoperatorsCole-HopftransformsingularSPDEs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that a single pair of compactly supported smooth test functions carries the entire weighted Besov theory on every homogeneous Lie group, with no case-by-case group structure and no representation theory. Its central theorem, Theorem 2.9, asserts that the Besov norm defined through localised test functions is equivalent, for regularities $\alpha$ outside the dilation spectrum, to a wavelet-like multiscale norm built from convolutions at dyadic scales. From that equivalence the paper derives, in one framework, Besov embeddings, a Taylor-remainder characterisation, Young-type multiplication, Schauder estimates for heat semigroups of a positive Rockland operator, and a Kolmogorov criterion for random distributions. The payoff is two well-posedness theorems for parabolic Anderson models: space-time noise in the Young regime with initial data as rough as Dirac masses, and purely spatial noise in the first singular regime via a Cole-Hopf transform adapted to Rockland operators. A sympathetic reader should take the paper's claim to be that one mechanism, the test-function pair of Assumption 2.7, organizes all of these results.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the test-function pair $(\varphi,\rho)$ of Assumption 2.7: both are compactly supported and smooth, $\rho$ has vanishing moments up to order $R$, and the repeated convolutions $\rho^{(n,m)}=\rho^{(n)}*\cdots*\rho^{(m)}$ converge to $\varphi^{(n)}$ in $C^\infty_c$. This pair generates the dyadic sequence $\xi_n=\xi*\tilde\varphi^{(n)}$, and Theorem 2.9 expresses the Besov norm of $\xi$ as an $\ell^q(L^p)$ sum of these pieces, which is what makes the later estimates look Euclidean. The other essential mechanism is the integral-form Taylor theorem (Theorem 1.10), which represents remainders by integrable measures and is used for the $\alpha>0$ direction, the Taylor-remainder norm of Theorem 2.13, and the Young multiplication theorem 2.15. For the SPDE applications, the mild sewing lemma (Lemma 3.1) handles time-dependent weighted Banach spaces and increments that blow up near $t=0$, while the Cole-Hopf identities of Section 3.3 transform the Anderson equation into a Young equation for $w=e^{-v}u$.

What would settle it

Take a concrete homogeneous Lie group not covered by Heisenberg-specific arguments, for instance the Engel group, construct the pair $(\varphi,\rho)$ explicitly from the cited lemma, and compare the Definition 5 Besov norm of $\delta_e$ with the multiscale norm (2.9) for $\alpha=-1$ and $p=q=2$; Theorem 2.9 predicts a bounded ratio independent of the pair. If the ratio is unbounded, or if the limit $\rho^{(n,m)}\to\varphi^{(n)}$ fails in $C^\infty_c$ rather than merely in distributions, the central equivalence is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Theorem 2.9: for $\alpha \notin \Delta$, where $\Delta$ is the dilation spectrum, the weighted inhomogeneous Besov norm of Definition 5 is equivalent to the multiscale quantity (2.9) when $\alpha<0$ and to (2.10) when $\alpha>0$, provided the pair $(\varphi,\rho)$ of compactly supported smooth functions satisfies Assumption 2.7. The paper proves the equivalence in both directions, then uses it to obtain embeddings, the Taylor-remainder norm, Young multiplication, convolution estimates for singular kernels, and the Kolmogorov criterion. On the SPDE side, Theorem 3.3 turns these estimates into a fixed-point theorem for the mild equation, Theorem 1.3 gives global well-posedness in the Young regime for singular initial data, and Theorem 1.6 establishes well-posedness in the first singular regime for purely spatial noise, with the renormalised solution independent of the mollifier and obtained from a variant of the Cole-Hopf transform for Rockland operators.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction rests on Assumption 2.7: on every homogeneous Lie group in question there must exist a compactly supported smooth pair $(\varphi,\rho)$ with $\rho$ having vanishing moments to order $R$ and with $\rho^{(n,m)}\to\varphi^{(n)}$, a fact the paper imports from previous work rather than proving here; if such a pair fails for some admissible group, the multiscale characterisation and every application built on it collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Besov embeddings on homogeneous Lie groups, including the Sobolev-type inequality with homogeneous dimension $|s|$, follow from one dyadic argument once Theorem 2.9 is available (Corollary 2.12).
  • Pointwise multiplication extends to weighted Besov spaces whenever $\alpha+\beta>0$, so the paraproduct estimates needed in Young-regime SPDEs do not require a group-specific construction (Theorem 2.15).
  • Heat semigroups of positive Rockland operators satisfy sharp Schauder estimates in these spaces, giving the time regularisation used in the fixed-point proof (Proposition 2.19).
  • Parabolic Anderson equations on arbitrary homogeneous Lie groups are globally well posed in the Young regime for stationary space-time noise with $\alpha/m+H>1/2$, even with initial data as rough as $\delta_e$ (Theorem 1.3).
  • For purely spatial Gaussian noise of regularity $\zeta$ in the interval determined by $\zeta_\star$, the mollified, renormalised Anderson equations converge in probability to a limit that is independent of the mollifier (Theorem 1.6).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the proof of Theorem 2.9 avoids the group's representation theory, the same two-function characterization ought to transfer to any homogeneous space admitting a metric dilation and an integral Taylor theorem; the paper does not explicitly claim this.
  • The Cole-Hopf transformation for Rockland operators writes the transformed equation as a sum of Young products whose coefficients are Bell polynomials in derivatives of $v$; continuing the same transformation below $\zeta_\star$ would require renormalising cubic and higher terms, so this construction is a natural route into the next singular regime.
  • The sewing lemma's time-dependent weighted norms were built for spatially unbounded noises on $G$; a testable consequence is that the same lemma should yield pathwise well-posedness for other singular SPDEs on non-compact groups, provided their heat kernels satisfy bounds like (2.32).
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops an intrinsic theory of weighted, inhomogeneous Besov spaces on arbitrary homogeneous Lie groups. The definition uses localized test functions, and the central result (Theorem 2.9) asserts an equivalent multiscale characterization built from a single compactly supported test-function pair (φ,ρ). From this characterization the paper derives Besov embeddings, a Taylor-remainder characterization, a Young-type product theorem (Theorem 2.15), Schauder estimates for convolution semigroups, and a weighted Kolmogorov criterion. These tools are then applied to parabolic Anderson-type equations associated with positive Rockland operators: a Young-regime well-posedness theorem for space-time noise and a first-singular-regime result for purely spatial noise via a Cole–Hopf transform. The paper claims to provide a group-uniform, largely self-contained foundation for singular SPDEs on homogeneous Lie groups.

Significance. If the main results were fully established, the paper would be a valuable contribution: it would unify and extend Besov-space techniques from the Heisenberg group and Euclidean settings to general homogeneous Lie groups without representation theory, and it would provide explicit well-posedness regimes for parabolic Anderson models with rough initial data. The organizational idea is attractive, and the multiscale characterization, Schauder estimates, sewing lemma, and the Cole–Hopf application are worked out in considerable detail. However, the central Young multiplication theorem contains a fundamental algebraic error in its proof, and all SPDE applications depend on that theorem. The paper also delegates the existence of the test-function pair in Assumption 2.7 to previous work without reproducing or precisely stating the construction, making the foundational layer conditional on an external input. As written, the central claims are not established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.4, Theorem 2.15 and Eq. (2.28)] The verification that the series defining F_m satisfies the recurrence F_{m+1} * ρ̃^{(m)} = F_m is invalid. In the displayed computation after Eq. (2.28), the term (f(ξ)_{m+1}) * ρ̃^{(m)} is replaced by (f(ξ)_m) * ρ̃^{(m)}, and later (f(ξ)_m) * ρ̃^{(m)} is identified with f(ξ)_m. These steps effectively use the identity (f ξ_{m+1}) * ρ̃^{(m)} = f (ξ_{m+1} * ρ̃^{(m)}), which is false for nonconstant f. With ξ_m = ξ * φ̃^{(m)}, it may be true that ξ_{m+1} * ρ̃^{(m)} = ξ_m, but (f ξ_{m+1}) * ρ̃^{(m)}(x) = ∫ f(y) ξ_{m+1}(y) ρ̃^{(m)}(x^{-1}y) dy is not equal to f(x) ξ_m(x); the difference is a commutator term of exactly the type the correction series in (2.28) is intended to encode. Without the recurrence, the subsequent bounds (2.29)–(2.31) do not establish convergence of the series to the product or the desired Besov estimate. This gap is load-bearing: Theorem 3.3 invokes Theorem 2.15 at (3.12), and Theorems 1.3 and 1.6 are consequences of Theorem 3.3. Thus the Young multiplication result and the SPDE applications are not proved as written.
  2. [Assumption 2.7 and Remark 2.8] Theorem 2.9, and therefore every result in the paper, is conditional on the existence of a pair (φ,ρ) satisfying the support, moment, and convergence properties in Assumption 2.7. The manuscript does not prove this existence: Remark 2.8 only states that the construction is elementary and refers to [MS25, Lem. 3.10]. Since the paper advertises itself as intrinsic and largely self-contained, and since the entire multiscale characterization collapses if no such pair exists for a given homogeneous Lie group, the paper should either reproduce the construction or state precisely the conditions on r, R, and the group under which such a pair exists. As it stands, the foundational input is unverified within the manuscript.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1, display after Eq. (2.13)] The expression "sup_{φ∈B_{-α'}⌉}" contains a stray closing bracket symbol that should be removed.
  2. [Section 2.4, proof of Theorem 2.15] The notation ρ^{(m,m-1)}_z := 1 is introduced without explanation; please define it explicitly in terms of the convolution convention used for ρ^{(n,m)}.
  3. [Theorem 1.6] The mollified noise ξ_ε = ξ * ρ_ε is used before ρ_ε is defined; please specify that ρ_ε(x) = ε^{-|s|} ρ(ε^{-1} · x).
  4. [Lemma 2.5] The assertion that both terms in inequality (2.8) vanish along a subsequence is terse. The second term is O(λ), and the first term should be quantified as O(λ^{α-d(I)}) using the Besov norm; please make this explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central multiscale characterization is proven by two-sided estimates from the defining norm, not stipulated into it; the only author-self-citations are for auxiliary building blocks.

full rationale

Theorem 2.9 is the load-bearing equivalence between Definition 5 and the multiscale quantities (2.9)/(2.10). This is not circular: Definition 5 is an infimum over all localised test functions with a polynomial part, while the multiscale norm is a sequence-space expression in ξ_n = ξ * φ̃^(n). The proof supplies quantitative bounds in both directions: it controls the defining supremum by the dyadic pieces through the vanishing-moment property of ρ and Lemma 2.11, and it reconstructs the distribution from a consistent sequence using the convergence in Assumption 2.7. The same theorem is then used as a tool, not as an input, for the embeddings, Taylor-remainder characterisation, Young product, Schauder estimates, Kolmogorov criterion and the fixed-point theorem. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no external benchmark is used as an output to choose exponents: the well-posedness regimes are derived from the estimates. The principal author-self-citations are [MS25, Thm. 2.13], quoted as Theorem 1.10, and [MS25, Lem. 3.10], cited in Remark 2.8 for the existence of the test-function pair (φ,ρ). Both are external published ingredients with stated hypotheses that do not include the target results, and Remark 2.8 sketches the elementary construction; they are therefore real supporting results rather than restatements of the paper's conclusions. A caveat outside circularity: the proof of Theorem 2.15 contains an apparent convolution–pointwise-product exchange that may be invalid, but that is a correctness gap, not a circular reduction, and it does not change the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on standard harmonic analysis on homogeneous Lie groups (dilations, homogeneous norms, Taylor expansions), on the existence of the test-function pair (phi,rho) borrowed from [MS25], on heat-kernel bounds for positive Rockland operators from [DHZ94, tR98], and on the stochastic covariance assumptions for the noises. No free parameters are fitted; the constants in the statements are explicit.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Existence of a homogeneous norm on every homogeneous Lie group that is smooth away from the origin and satisfies the triangle inequality.
    Used throughout Definition 1 and in the estimates to measure scales; cited to [HS90].
  • standard math Taylor theorem with integral remainder for homogeneous Lie groups ([MS25, Thm. 2.13]).
    Used in the proof of Theorem 2.9 for alpha>0, in Theorem 2.13, and in the Cole-Hopf analysis; the present paper states it as Theorem 1.10 without proof.
  • domain assumption Existence of the test-function pair (phi,rho) satisfying Assumption 2.7.
    The multiscale characterization depends on this pair. Remark 2.8 says the construction is elementary and cites [MS25, Lem. 3.10], but the details are not reproduced in this paper.
  • domain assumption Heat kernels of positive Rockland operators satisfy the pointwise bounds and moment conditions of Assumption 2.16.
    Used to prove Schauder estimates in Proposition 2.19, which underpins the fixed-point theorem; cited to [DHZ94, Thm. 10] and [tR98, Prop. 5.5].
  • domain assumption The covariance bound for the Gaussian noise in Theorem 1.6 makes the Wick product covariance locally integrable.
    Used in the sketched proof of Claim 3.7; the claim that 1+|z|^{4zeta+2m-kappa} is locally integrable for zeta in (zeta_star,-m/2] is asserted without a full verification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Weighted Besov Spaces on Homogeneous Lie Groups and Applications to Parabolic Anderson Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WUQVX6MD

@misc{pith2026260813392,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Weighted Besov Spaces on Homogeneous Lie Groups and Applications to Parabolic Anderson Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WUQVX6MD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13392}
}
read the original abstract

We develop an intrinsic theory of weighted, inhomogeneous Besov spaces on general homogeneous Lie groups without recourse to group-specific arguments. Starting from a definition in terms of localised test functions, we establish an equivalent, wavelet-like, multiscale characterisation. This provides a unified mechanism for deriving Besov embeddings, a Taylor-remainder characterisation, Young-type product estimates, Schauder estimates for convolution semigroups, and a weighted Kolmogorov criterion for random distributions. We apply this framework to parabolic Anderson-type equations associated with positive Rockland operators and with singular initial data. For space-time noise, our results cover the Young regime. For purely spatial noise, we also establish well-posedness in the first singular regime using a variant of the Cole-Hopf transform for Rockland operators. Both applications rely on a mild sewing lemma that accommodates time-dependent Banach spaces and increments with a singularity at the initial time.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. Antoine . Weyl law for the A nderson H amiltonian on a two-dimensional manifold. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar\'e Probab. Stat. 58, no. 3, (2022), 1385--1425. doi:10.1214/21-aihp1216 https://doi.org/10.1214/21-aihp1216

    doi:10.1214/21-aihp1216 2022

  2. [2]

    Bailleul and Y

    I. Bailleul and Y. Bruned . Locality for singular stochastic PDE s. Ann. Probab. 54, no. 2, (2026), 768--795. doi:10.1214/25-aop1778 https://doi.org/10.1214/25-aop1778

    doi:10.1214/25-aop1778 2026

  3. [3]

    Bruned , A

    Y. Bruned , A. Chandra , I. Chevyrev , and M. Hairer . Renormalising SPDE s in regularity structures. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 23, no. 3, (2021), 869--947. doi:10.4171/jems/1025 https://doi.org/10.4171/jems/1025

    doi:10.4171/jems/1025 2021

  4. [4]

    Bahouri , J.-Y

    H. Bahouri , J.-Y. Chemin , and R. Danchin . Tempered distributions and F ourier transform on the H eisenberg group. Ann. H. Lebesgue 1, (2018), 1--46. doi:10.5802/ahl.1 https://doi.org/10.5802/ahl.1

    doi:10.5802/ahl.1 2018

  5. [5]

    Baudoin , L

    F. Baudoin , L. Chen , C.-H. Huang , C. Ouyang , S. Tindel , and J. Wang . Parabolic Anderson model in bounded domains of recurrent metric measure spaces (2024). arXiv:2401.01797 https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01797 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01797 https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01797

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Baudoin , L

    F. Baudoin , L. Chen , C.-H. Huang , C. Ouyang , S. Tindel , and J. Wang . Weighted Besov spaces on Heisenberg groups and applications to the Parabolic Anderson model , 2025. arXiv:2501.04593 https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.04593 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.04593 https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.04593

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Bahouri , C

    H. Bahouri , C. Fermanian-Kammerer , and I. Gallagher . Phase-space analysis and pseudodifferential calculus on the H eisenberg group. Ast\'erisque , no. 342, (2012), vi+127

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Bahouri and I

    H. Bahouri and I. Gallagher . Paraproduit sur le groupe de H eisenberg et applications. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 17, no. 1, (2001), 69--105. doi:10.4171/RMI/289 https://doi.org/10.4171/RMI/289

    work page doi:10.4171/rmi/289 2001

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Bruned , F

    Y. Bruned , F. Gabriel , M. Hairer , and L. Zambotti . Geometric stochastic heat equations. Journal of the American Mathematical Society 35, no. 1, (2022), 1--80

    2022

  2. [10]

    Bruned , M

    Y. Bruned , M. Hairer , and L. Zambotti . Algebraic renormalisation of regularity structures. Invent. Math. 215, no. 3, (2019), 1039--1156. doi:10.1007/s00222-018-0841-x https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-018-0841-x

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    Baudoin , C

    F. Baudoin , C. Ouyang , S. Tindel , and J. Wang . Parabolic A nderson model on H eisenberg groups: the I t\^o setting. J. Funct. Anal. 285, no. 1, (2023), Paper No. 109920, 44. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2023.109920 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2023.109920

    2023

  4. [12]

    Broux , H

    L. Broux , H. Singh , and R. Steele . Renormalised models for variable coefficient singular SPDEs . arXiv preprint (2025). arXiv:2507.06851 https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06851

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Chandra , I

    A. Chandra , I. Chevyrev , M. Hairer , and H. Shen . Langevin dynamic for the 2 D Y ang- M ills measure. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes \' E tudes Sci. 136, (2022), 1--147. doi:10.1007/s10240-022-00132-0 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10240-022-00132-0

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    Chandra , I

    A. Chandra , I. Chevyrev , M. Hairer , and H. Shen . Stochastic quantisation of Y ang- M ills- H iggs in 3 D . Invent. Math. 237, no. 2, (2024), 541--696. doi:10.1007/s00222-024-01264-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-024-01264-2

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Chen , B

    Y. Chen , B. Fehrman , and W. Xu . Periodic homogenisation for two dimensional generalised parabolic A nderson model. Probab. Theory Related Fields 194, no. 3-4, (2026), 1235--1286. doi:10.1007/s00440-026-01465-1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-026-01465-1

    2026 doi

  8. [16]

    Chandra and M

    A. Chandra and M. Hairer . An analytic BPHZ theorem for regularity structures. arXiv preprint (2016). arXiv:1612.08138 https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.08138

    2016 arXiv

  9. [17]

    N. Clozeau . An inductive approach to stochastic estimates for the ^ 4 _2 -equation with correlated coefficient field. arXiv preprint (2025). arXiv:2509.11309 https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.11309 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.11309 https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.11309

    2025

  10. [18]

    Cardona and M

    D. Cardona and M. Ruzhansky . Littlewood- P aley theorem, N ikolskii inequality, B esov spaces, F ourier and spectral multipliers on graded L ie groups. Potential Anal. 60, no. 3, (2024), 965--1005. doi:10.1007/s11118-023-10076-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11118-023-10076-7

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    Chevyrev and H

    I. Chevyrev and H. Shen . Invariant measure and universality of the 2 D Y ang- M ills L angevin dynamic. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 79, no. 8, (2026), 1973--2102. doi:10.1002/cpa.70043 https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.70043

    2026 doi

  12. [20]

    Clozeau and H

    N. Clozeau and H. Singh . Renormalisation of singular SPDE s with correlated coefficients. SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. 22, (2026), Paper No. 021, 35. doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2026.021 https://doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2026.021

    2026 doi

  13. [21]

    Chen and W

    Y. Chen and W. Xu . Periodic homogenisation for p( )_2 (2023). arXiv:2311.16398 https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16398 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16398 https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16398

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Chen , Yifan , and Yang

    H. Chen , Yifan , and Yang . Wick renormalized parabolic stochastic quantization equations on rough metric measure spaces (2026). arXiv:2605.05442 https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05442 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05442 https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05442

    2026 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Dahlqvist , J

    A. Dahlqvist , J. Diehl , and B. K. Driver . The parabolic A nderson model on R iemann surfaces. Probab. Theory Related Fields 174, no. 1-2, (2019), 369--444. doi:10.1007/s00440-018-0857-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-018-0857-6

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    Dziuba\'nski , W

    J. Dziuba\'nski , W. Hebisch , and J. Zienkiewicz . Note on semigroups generated by positive R ockland operators on graded homogeneous groups. Studia Math. 110, no. 2, (1994), 115--126. doi:10.4064/sm-110-2-115-126 https://doi.org/10.4064/sm-110-2-115-126

    1994 doi

  17. [25]

    Friz and M

    P. Friz and M. Hairer . A Course on Rough Paths: With an Introduction to Regularity Structures. Universitext. Springer International Publishing, 2020

    2020

  18. [26]

    F\"uhr and A

    H. F\"uhr and A. Mayeli . Homogeneous B esov spaces on stratified L ie groups and their wavelet characterization. J. Funct. Spaces Appl. (2012), Art. ID 523586, 41. doi:10.1155/2012/523586 https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/523586

    2012 doi

  19. [27]

    Furioli , C

    G. Furioli , C. Melzi , and A. Veneruso . Littlewood- P aley decompositions and B esov spaces on L ie groups of polynomial growth. Math. Nachr. 279, no. 9-10, (2006), 1028--1040. doi:10.1002/mana.200510409 https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.200510409

    2006 doi

  20. [28]

    G. B. Folland . Subelliptic estimates and function spaces on nilpotent L ie groups. Ark. Mat. 13, no. 2, (1975), 161--207. doi:10.1007/BF02386204 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02386204

    1975 doi

  21. [29]

    Fischer and M

    V. Fischer and M. Ruzhansky . Quantization on nilpotent L ie groups , vol. 314 of Progress in Mathematics. Birkh\" a user/Springer, [Cham], 2016, xiii+557. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29558-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29558-9

    2016 doi

  22. [30]

    G. B. Folland and E. M. Stein . Hardy spaces on homogeneous groups, vol. 28 of Mathematical Notes. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.; University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1982, xii+285

    1982

  23. [31]

    Gerasimovi c s and M

    A. Gerasimovi c s and M. Hairer . H\"ormander's theorem for semilinear SPDE s. Electron. J. Probab. 24, (2019), Paper No. 132, 56. doi:10.1214/19-ejp387 https://doi.org/10.1214/19-ejp387

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    Gubinelli , P

    M. Gubinelli , P. Imkeller , and N. Perkowski . Paracontrolled distributions and singular PDE s. Forum Math. Pi 3, (2015), 75. doi:10.1017/fmp.2015.2 https://doi.org/10.1017/fmp.2015.2

    2015 doi

  25. [33]

    Gallagher and Y

    I. Gallagher and Y. Sire . Besov algebras on L ie groups of polynomial growth. Studia Math. 212, no. 2, (2012), 119--139. doi:10.4064/sm212-2-2 https://doi.org/10.4064/sm212-2-2

    2012 doi

  26. [34]

    Gubinelli and S

    M. Gubinelli and S. Tindel . Rough evolution equations. Ann. Probab. 38, no. 1, (2010), 1--75. doi:10.1214/08-AOP437 https://doi.org/10.1214/08-AOP437

    2010 doi

  27. [35]

    M. Hairer . A theory of regularity structures. Inventiones mathematicae 198, no. 2, (2014), 269--504. doi:10.1007/s00222-014-0505-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-014-0505-4

    2014 doi

  28. [36]

    Hairer and C

    M. Hairer and C. Labb\' e . A simple construction of the continuum parabolic A nderson model on ^2 . Electron. Commun. Probab. 20, (2015), no. 43, 11. doi:10.1214/ECP.v20-4038 https://doi.org/10.1214/ECP.v20-4038

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    G. Hu , D. Rottensteiner , M. Ruzhansky , and J. T. van Velthoven . Besov and Triebel-Lizorkin spaces on homogeneous groups , 2025. arXiv:2501.08997 https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.08997 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.08997 https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.08997

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Hebisch and A

    W. Hebisch and A. Sikora . A smooth subadditive homogeneous norm on a homogeneous group. Studia Math. 96, no. 3, (1990), 231--236. doi:10.4064/sm-96-3-231-236 https://doi.org/10.4064/sm-96-3-231-236

    1990 doi

  31. [39]

    Hairer and H

    M. Hairer and H. Singh . Regularity structures on manifolds and vector bundles. arXiv preprint (2023). arXiv:2308.05049 https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05049

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Hairer and H

    M. Hairer and H. Singh . Homogenisation of singular SPDE s. arXiv preprint (2025). arXiv:2510.19339 https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19339

    2025

  33. [41]

    Hairer and H

    M. Hairer and H. Singh . Periodic space-time homogenisation of the ^4_2 equation. Journal of Functional Analysis 288, no. 5, (2025), 110762. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2024.110762 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2024.110762

    2025

  34. [42]

    Z. Hao , X. Zhang , R. Zhu , and X. Zhu . Singular kinetic equations and applications. Ann. Probab. 52, no. 2, (2024), 576--657. doi:10.1214/23-aop1666 https://doi.org/10.1214/23-aop1666

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    Y. Meyer . Wavelets and operators. No. 37. Cambridge university press, 1992

    1992

  36. [44]

    Mayorcas and H

    A. Mayorcas and H. Singh . Singular SPDE s on homogeneous lie groups. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mathematics (2025), 1–72. doi:10.1017/prm.2025.1 https://doi.org/10.1017/prm.2025.1

    2025 doi

  37. [45]

    K. Saka . Besov spaces and Sobolev spaces on a nilpotent Lie group . Tohoku Mathematical Journal 31, no. 4, (1979), 383 -- 437. doi:10.2748/tmj/1178229728 https://doi.org/10.2748/tmj/1178229728

    1979

  38. [46]

    H. Singh . Canonical solutions to non-translation invariant singular SPDEs . Electronic Journal of Probability 30, (2025), 1--24. doi:10.1214/25-EJP1315 https://doi.org/10.1214/25-EJP1315

    2025 doi

  39. [47]

    ter Elst and D

    A. ter Elst and D. W. Robinson . Weighted Subcoercive Operators on Lie Groups . Journal of Functional Analysis 157, no. 1, (1998), 88--163. doi:10.1006/jfan.1998.3259 https://doi.org/10.1006/jfan.1998.3259

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.