pith. sign in

arxiv: 2204.01176 · v1 · pith:WUTDC3LFnew · submitted 2022-04-03 · 💻 cs.CY · cs.CR· cs.GT

Analyzing Voting Power in Decentralized Governance: Who controls DAOs?

classification 💻 cs.CY cs.CRcs.GT
keywords governancevotingpowersystemsanalyzeanalyzingblockchaincompound
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We empirically study the state of three prominent DAO governance systems on the Ethereum blockchain: Compound, Uniswap and ENS. In particular, we examine how the voting power is distributed in these systems. Using a comprehensive dataset of all governance token holders, delegates, proposals and votes, we analyze who holds the voting rights and how they are used to influence governance decisions.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TwoStepDemocracy: Prototyping of self-evolving, democratic, and decentralized systems

    cs.DC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    TwoStepDemocracy is a P2P prototype demonstrating technical feasibility of a coordination layer that separates demand, approval, and payment for democratic evolution of decentralized protocols.