The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2003.06461 · v2 · pith:WVDTEOSJ · submitted 2020-03-13 · cs.IR · cs.HC· cs.LG

Exploring User Opinions of Fairness in Recommender Systems

Reviewed by Pithpith:WVDTEOSJopen to challenge →

classification cs.IR cs.HCcs.LG
keywords fairnesssystemswhatbecomefairmightopinionsrecommendation
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Algorithmic fairness for artificial intelligence has become increasingly relevant as these systems become more pervasive in society. One realm of AI, recommender systems, presents unique challenges for fairness due to trade offs between optimizing accuracy for users and fairness to providers. But what is fair in the context of recommendation--particularly when there are multiple stakeholders? In an initial exploration of this problem, we ask users what their ideas of fair treatment in recommendation might be, and why. We analyze what might cause discrepancies or changes between user's opinions towards fairness to eventually help inform the design of fairer and more transparent recommendation algorithms.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Offline Evaluation Measures of Fairness in Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The thesis identifies theoretical, empirical, and conceptual flaws in offline fairness measures for recommender systems and contributes new evaluation methods and practical guidelines.