Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.10574 v5 pith:X35QM5G3 submitted 2018-06-27 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CVstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CVstat.ML
keywords imagenetworkdeepclassificationprotopnetprototypicalaccuracyachieve
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

When we are faced with challenging image classification tasks, we often explain our reasoning by dissecting the image, and pointing out prototypical aspects of one class or another. The mounting evidence for each of the classes helps us make our final decision. In this work, we introduce a deep network architecture -- prototypical part network (ProtoPNet), that reasons in a similar way: the network dissects the image by finding prototypical parts, and combines evidence from the prototypes to make a final classification. The model thus reasons in a way that is qualitatively similar to the way ornithologists, physicians, and others would explain to people on how to solve challenging image classification tasks. The network uses only image-level labels for training without any annotations for parts of images. We demonstrate our method on the CUB-200-2011 dataset and the Stanford Cars dataset. Our experiments show that ProtoPNet can achieve comparable accuracy with its analogous non-interpretable counterpart, and when several ProtoPNets are combined into a larger network, it can achieve an accuracy that is on par with some of the best-performing deep models. Moreover, ProtoPNet provides a level of interpretability that is absent in other interpretable deep models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do you see what I see? An Ambiguous Optical Illusion Dataset exposing limitations of Explainable AI

    cs.CV 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ambivision is a new dataset of AI-generated animal optical illusions, and the paper claims that adding gaze and eye annotations as visible image features improves classification while exposing limits of pixel-based ex...

  2. PRECISE-AS: Personalized Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Point-of-Care Echocardiography in Aortic Stenosis Diagnosis

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An RL-driven video acquisition policy for echocardiography keeps aortic stenosis classification at 80.6% balanced accuracy while acquiring only 47% of the videos on average.

  3. Towards Interpretable PolSAR Image Classification: Polarimetric Scattering Mechanism Informed Concept Bottleneck and Kolmogorov-Arnold Network

    eess.IV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A concept bottleneck model built from polarimetric target decomposition plus a Kolmogorov-Arnold Network gives PolSAR classification with human-auditable concept predictions and symbolic decision formulas.

  4. First-of-its-kind AI model for bioacoustic detection using a lightweight associative memory Hopfield neural network

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Hopfield neural network trained on two bat calls classifies 10,384 recordings in 5.4 seconds with claimed accuracy up to 80%, though the headline numbers hinge on removing ambiguous calls.

Pith tools