Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

CaRL: Learning Scalable Planning Policies with Simple Rewards

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.17838 v3 pith:XK2QDROZ submitted 2025-04-24 cs.LG cs.AIcs.RO

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.RO
keywords rewardsapproachescarlalearningmini-batchrewardbenchmarkcompletion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate reinforcement learning (RL) for privileged planning in autonomous driving. State-of-the-art approaches for this task are rule-based, but these methods do not scale to the long tail. RL, on the other hand, is scalable and does not suffer from compounding errors like imitation learning. Contemporary RL approaches for driving use complex shaped rewards that sum multiple individual rewards, \eg~progress, position, or orientation rewards. We show that PPO fails to optimize a popular version of these rewards when the mini-batch size is increased, which limits the scalability of these approaches. Instead, we propose a new reward design based primarily on optimizing a single intuitive reward term: route completion. Infractions are penalized by terminating the episode or multiplicatively reducing route completion. We find that PPO scales well with higher mini-batch sizes when trained with our simple reward, even improving performance. Training with large mini-batch sizes enables efficient scaling via distributed data parallelism. We scale PPO to 300M samples in CARLA and 500M samples in nuPlan with a single 8-GPU node. The resulting model achieves 64 DS on the CARLA longest6 v2 benchmark, outperforming other RL methods with more complex rewards by a large margin. Requiring only minimal adaptations from its use in CARLA, the same method is the best learning-based approach on nuPlan. It scores 91.3 in non-reactive and 90.6 in reactive traffic on the Val14 benchmark while being an order of magnitude faster than prior work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On Data Thinning for Model Validation in Small Area Estimation

    stat.ME 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Thinned-data MSE for small-area models is unbiased for a risk that systematically differs from full-data risk; under Fay-Herriot the gap is closed-form in the model's shrinkage, and the thinning fraction faces a sharp...

  2. Zero-Human Demonstration End-to-end Autonomous Driving with Trajectory Scorer

    cs.RO 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A reward-only offline RL method for trajectory planning in end-to-end autonomous driving achieves state-of-the-art on Navhard and competitive closed-loop HUGSIM performance without imitation learning.

  3. CLEAR: Closed-Loop Reinforcement Learning at Scale for End-to-End Autonomous Driving

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    Residual waypoint RL around a frozen VLA prior, scaled via heterogeneous CARLA/H100 infrastructure, raises closed-loop driving score and success rate on longest6 v2 and Bench2Drive.

  4. End-to-End Crop Row Navigation via LiDAR-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning

    cs.RO 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Raw 3D LiDAR, compressed into flattened voxel maps, trains a reinforcement learning policy that reliably follows straight crop rows in simulation and degrades on curvier rows.

Pith tools