Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

A Minkowski problem for $\alpha$-concave functions via optimal transport

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that every probability measure with finite first moment, barycenter at the origin, and support not in any hyperplane is the Euclidean surface area measure of some α-concave measure with zero spherical surface area, for…

desk verdict Solid extension of Santambrogio's moment-measure theorem to α∈(-1/n,0), with the honest caveat that it solves the measure-level Minkowski problem rather than the original function-level one. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.14735 v2 pith:XMKSLN7B submitted 2025-06-17 math.FA math.APmath.MG

Xiao Li , Nguyen Dac Khoi Nguyen , Deping Ye This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.FAmath.APmath.MG MSC 26B2552A4052A4135G2031B99
keywords alpha-concavefunctionsmeasuressurfaceareameasureMinkowskiproblemoptimaltransportfirstvariationMonge-Ampereequationmoment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that, for $\alpha\in(-1/n,0)$, every probability measure $\mu$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$ with finite first moment, barycenter at the origin, and support not lying in any hyperplane is the Euclidean surface area measure of some $\alpha$-concave measure whose spherical surface area measure is zero. This is the sufficiency half of a functional analogue of the classical Minkowski problem: instead of a convex body, one seeks an $\alpha$-concave function or measure whose surface-area data recover a prescribed measure. The authors first derive a variational formula for the first variation of total mass under the $\alpha$-sum, which defines the two surface-area measures, and then solve the existence problem by optimal transport. A sympathetic reader should care because the theorem gives a clean prescription of which measures are surface-area measures in the negative-exponent range, extending the log-concave moment-measure theory to $\alpha$-concave objects.

What carries the argument

The central object is the $\alpha$-sum $f\oplus_\alpha t\bullet_\alpha g=(1-\alpha(\varphi^*+t\psi^*)^*)^{1/\alpha}$, whose first variation turns total mass into a linear functional with integrands that define the Euclidean surface area measure $(\nabla\varphi)_\sharp(f^{1-\alpha}dx)$ and the spherical surface area measure $(\nu_{K_f})_\sharp(f\,dH^{n-1}|_{\partial K_f})$. To prove existence, the paper minimizes the functional $(1-\alpha)F_\alpha(\varrho)-\alpha T(\varrho,\mu)$ over probability measures, where $F_\alpha(\varrho)=-\int\rho^{1/(1-\alpha)}dx$ and $T$ is the maximal-correlation functional of optimal transport. The minimizer is shown to have the form $(1-\alpha\varphi_0)^{1/\alpha-1}dx+\varrho_0^s$ with $\varrho_0^s$ supported on $\{\varphi_0=1/\alpha\}$, and the Knott-Smith criterion guarantees an optimal plan whose support lies in $\mathrm{Graph}(\partial\varphi_0)$, which is precisely what Definition 4.4 requires for $\mu$ to be the Euclidean surface area measure.

What would settle it

Take $n=1$, $\alpha=-1/2$, and $\mu=(\delta_{-1}+\delta_1)/2$; this measure has finite first moment, barycenter $0$, and is not supported on a hyperplane. Solve the one-dimensional minimization problem $\inf\{(1-\alpha)F_\alpha(\varrho)-\alpha T(\varrho,\mu)\}$ explicitly and check whether the resulting potential $\varphi_0$ is coercive and whether the singular part of the minimizer lies in $\{\varphi_0=1/\alpha\}$. Alternatively, for a non-atomic $\mu$ in any dimension, test whether the constructed solution has $\inf\varphi_0>1/\alpha$; if it does, the original function-level Minkowski problem is solved for that $\mu$, and if not, the singular part is genuinely needed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Let $-1/n<\alpha<0$ and let $\mu$ be a probability measure with finite first moment, barycenter at the origin, and support not contained in any hyperplane. The paper establishes that there exists an $\alpha$-concave measure $\bar\varrho=(1-\alpha\varphi_0)^{1/\alpha}\,dx+\varrho_0^s$ such that the Euclidean surface area measure of $\bar\varrho$ is exactly $\mu$ and its spherical surface area measure is the zero measure. The proof begins with the first-variation identity $\delta J_\alpha(f,g)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\psi^*(\nabla\varphi)f^{1-\alpha}dx+\int_{\partial K_f}h_{D\psi}(\nu)f\,dH^{n-1}$, which gives the pair of surface-area measures. These notions are then extended to $\alpha$-concave measures, allowing a singular part supported on $\{\varphi_0=1/\alpha\}$, and the existence theorem is obtained by minimizing $(1-\alpha)F_\alpha(\varrho)-\alpha T(\varrho,\mu)$ and applying the Knott-Smith optimality criterion to place the optimal plan inside the graph of $\partial\varphi_0$. The same three conditions on $\mu$ had already been shown necessary for Euclidean surface-area measures of $\alpha$-concave functions with essentially continuous base, so the theorem completes the characterization at the level of $\alpha$-concave measures.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing step is the inference in Proposition 4.9 that the optimal-transport dual potential $\varphi_1$ is coercive whenever $\mu$ has finite first moment; if that inference fails for some measure, the minimizer need not have the growth that places the singular part on $\{\varphi_0=1/\alpha\}$, and the representation in Definition 4.4 would not apply.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every $\mu$ satisfying finite first moment, barycenter at the origin, and non-planar support, Theorem 4.11 produces an $\alpha$-concave measure with Euclidean surface area measure $\mu$ and zero spherical surface area measure; this is the sufficiency half of the characterization begun in Theorem 4.3.
  • Whenever the constructed potential has $\inf\varphi_0>1/\alpha$, the solution is an ordinary $\alpha$-concave function and the original Euclidean functional Minkowski problem (Problem 3.14) is solved; the authors leave open when this happens.
  • In the smooth case the extended problem is equivalent to the Monge–Ampère equation $h(\nabla\varphi)\det(\nabla^2\varphi)=(1-\alpha\varphi)^{(1-\alpha)/\alpha}$, so the theorem supplies a weak, measure-valued solution for arbitrary measures in the stated class.
  • The result interpolates the classical convex-body Minkowski theorem and the log-concave moment-measure theorem: as $\alpha$ moves through $(-1/n,0)$, characteristic functions of convex bodies and log-concave densities sit at the two ends.
  • Together with the necessity results, the theorem says the triple of conditions—finite first moment, centered barycenter, and non-degeneracy—is exactly what characterizes Euclidean surface-area measures of $\alpha$-concave measures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the coercivity inference in Proposition 4.9 could be replaced by a weaker growth hypothesis, the same optimal-transport strategy would likely cover exponents outside $(-1/n,0)$ or Orlicz-type functionals where finite first moment alone does not force superlinear potentials.
  • The authors' open question about $\inf\varphi_0>1/\alpha$ suggests a testable dichotomy: for sufficiently regular, fast-decaying $\mu$ the singular part should vanish, so one could predict exactly when the function-level problem has a solution.
  • Because the singular part is concentrated on $\{\varphi_0=1/\alpha\}$, the construction shows how point masses in $\mu$ are absorbed by 'infinite-density' regions of the $\alpha$-concave measure; this mechanism may transfer to other functional Brunn–Minkowski problems.
  • One could numerically solve the one-dimensional minimization for representative measures to map the boundary between the regular regime ($\inf\varphi_0>1/\alpha$) and the singular regime, giving explicit evidence for when Problem 3.14 is solvable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper develops notions of Euclidean and spherical surface area measures for α-concave functions on R^n when -1/n<α<0, via a first-variation formula for the total mass under the α-sum operation, and then extends these notions to α-concave measures. The main variational result is Theorem 3.11, which identifies δJ_α(f,g) as the sum of a bulk integral involving ψ*(∇φ) and a boundary integral over ∂K_f. Section 4 establishes necessary conditions for the functional Minkowski problem (Theorem 4.3) and then, using optimal transport, proves the main existence result Theorem 4.11: for any probability measure μ with finite first moment, barycenter at the origin, and support not contained in a hyperplane, there exists an α-concave measure \barϱ=(1-αφ_0)^{1/α}dx+ϱ_0^s whose Euclidean surface area measure is μ and whose spherical surface area measure is zero. The authors state explicitly that Problem 3.14 for α-concave functions, rather than measures, remains open.

Significance. If the proofs hold, this is a valuable contribution to the functional Brunn-Minkowski program and to the optimal-transport approach to Minkowski-type problems, extending work of Santambrogio for log-concave functions to the α-concave range with a possibly singular part. The optimal-transport argument in Section 4 is largely self-contained and does not use the target result as an input. I specifically checked the coercivity step in Proposition 4.9: if φ_1 were not coercive, φ_1^* would be +∞ on an open half-space, forcing μ to vanish on that half-space; with barycenter zero this would put μ on a hyperplane, contradicting the assumption. This step is sound. The manuscript is also transparent about its main limitation, namely that Theorem 4.11 solves the extended measure-level problem and leaves the function-level Problem 3.14 open. The principal weakness is that the variational formula in Section 3 relies on Lemma 3.6, whose proof is omitted and imported from an unpublished preprint.

major comments (1)
  1. [Lemma 3.6 and Theorem 3.8] Lemma 3.6 is a load-bearing ingredient for the boundary term in the advertised variational formula (3.43) and hence for Theorem 3.11, but no proof is supplied: the text states that it 'follows from [25, Lemma 5.3] verbatim and is omitted.' Since reference [25] is an arXiv preprint rather than a published source, the derivation of the variational formula is not fully verifiable from the present manuscript. Please reproduce the proof of Lemma 3.6 in this paper, or ensure that the cited result is available in a published reference. This does not affect the optimal-transport part of Section 4, but it is essential for the completeness of Section 3.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Theorem 4.11] The statement constructs \barϱ=(1-αφ_0)^{1/α}dx+ϱ_0^s, but the finiteness of this measure is not verified in the proof. It follows from the coercivity of φ_0 (so that φ_0-1/α≥0 is coercive) together with Lemma 2.2, but this should be stated explicitly.
  2. [Abstract and Section 4.2] The title and abstract refer to a 'Minkowski problem for α-concave functions,' but the main existence theorem is for α-concave measures, and the authors explicitly leave the function-level Problem 3.14 open. The abstract should state this scope limitation clearly to avoid overclaiming.
  3. [Section 2.2, Theorem 2.3] There is a typo: 'Furthurmore' should be 'Furthermore.'
  4. [Equation (4.25), Section 4.2] In the chain of inequalities for T(ϱ_ε,μ), the notation T(ρ_0,μ) is used where T(ϱ_0,μ) is meant, since the transport term includes the singular part; please correct this for notational consistency.
  5. [Proposition 2.5, proof] In the dominated-convergence display after (2.19), the limit variable is written as 'x→∞' where 'n→∞' is intended. Also, the phrase 'lim_{x→∞}' should be 'lim_{n→∞}' throughout that passage.
  6. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'summaried' in the introduction and 'Lebesgure' in Section 3; a careful proofreading pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the optimal-transport existence proof is self-contained, with one minor self-citation in the variational-formula section not supporting the main theorem.

full rationale

The paper's central result, Theorem 4.11, is proved by a self-contained optimal-transport argument. Proposition 4.9 establishes existence of a minimizer for problem (4.5) using the Knott-Smith optimality criterion, tightness from Proposition 2.5, and lower-semicontinuity of the functional; Proposition 4.7 derives the form of the minimizer as an α-concave measure; Theorem 2.3 then supplies the transference plan whose support lies in Graph(∂φ0); and Proposition 4.10 shows essential continuity, so the spherical surface area measure vanishes. None of these steps uses the target measure μ as an input beyond the stated assumptions, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The only notable self-citation is Lemma 3.6, whose proof is omitted and attributed verbatim to [25], a preprint co-authored by D. Ye; this lemma supplies the radial-function variation used in Theorems 3.8-3.11 to derive the variational formula (1.5) and to motivate Definitions 3.12 and 4.4. This is load-bearing for the function-level variational formula, but the main existence theorem in Section 4 does not rest on it, and the paper explicitly leaves the function-level Problem 3.14 open unless inf φ0 > 1/α. The fragile bridge identified in the reader's take, namely the coercivity claim in Proposition 4.9, is sound: a non-coercive proper lower semicontinuous convex φ1 would make φ1* infinite on an open halfspace, forcing μ to vanish there and, together with barycenter at the origin, forcing μ onto a hyperplane, contradicting the assumption that μ is not supported in any hyperplane. Thus there is no definitional circularity, no fitted-input prediction, and no author-imported uniqueness claim in the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical free parameters are fitted; α is a fixed exponent in the theorem's range, and β1, β2 are existential constants in the assumptions. The paper introduces mathematical definitions: Euclidean and spherical surface area measures for α-concave measures, and α-concave measures with a singular part on {φ=1/α}. These are not speculative physical entities, so the invented_entities ledger is empty.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Legendre-Fenchel duality, subgradient calculus, support functions, and Gauss map properties for convex functions and convex sets.
    Used throughout Sections 2 and 3, including Lemma 2.1 from [52] and identity (2.5).
  • standard math Knott-Smith optimality criterion and dual representation of the maximal correlation functional T (Theorem 2.3 and Proposition 2.4).
    Foundational for the optimal transport existence proof in Section 4.2.
  • domain assumption [25, Lemma 5.3]: radial variation of unbounded closed convex sets under Minkowski addition, quoted verbatim in Lemma 3.6.
    Supplies the boundary term h_{Dψ} in the variational formula (3.55); the proof is not included in the present text.
  • domain assumption [21, Lemma 3]: essential continuity of convex functions implies continuity on almost every line, used to show the spherical surface area measure vanishes.
    Used in Lemma 4.1 and Proposition 4.10 to prove the base is essentially continuous.
  • standard math [57, Lemma 1.6.11]: lower semi-continuity of convex φ with o∈int(dom φ) permits interchanging limits with the supporting functionals.
    Used in Theorem 3.3 and Lemma 3.7 to pass the t-limit inside the integral.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Minkowski problem for $\alpha$-concave functions via optimal transport." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XMKSLN7B

@misc{pith2026250614735,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Minkowski problem for $\alpha$-concave functions via optimal transport},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XMKSLN7B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.14735}
}
abstract

The notions of the Euclidean surface area measure and the spherical surface area measure of $\alpha$-concave functions in $\mathbb{R}^n$, with $-\frac{1}{n}<\alpha<0$, are introduced via a first variation of the total mass functional with respect to the $\alpha$-sum operation. Subsequently, these notions are extended to those for $\alpha$-concave measures. We then study the Minkowski problem associated with the Euclidean surface area measures of $\alpha$-concave measures via optimal transport.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Gaussian Minkowski problem for epigraphs of convex functions

    math.FA 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The Gaussian Minkowski problem is generalized to epigraphs of convex functions, and existence of convex functions realizing prescribed Gaussian moment measures is established under mild conditions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [25]

    http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.16141, (2024)

    Fang, N., Ye, D., Zhang, Z.: The Riesz α-energy of log-concave functions and related Minkowski problem. http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.16141, (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Aleksandrov, A. D.: Zur Theorie der gemischten Volumina von konvexen K¨ orpern, III: Die Erweiterung zweier Lehrs¨ atze Minkowskis ¨ uber die konvexen Polyeder auf beliebige konvexe Fl¨ achen(in Russian). Mat. Sbornik N. S. 3, 27-46 (1938)

    work page 1938

  3. [2]

    H., Villa, R.:Rogers-Shephard and local Loomis–Whitney type inequalities

    Alonso-Guti´ errez, D., Artstein-Avidan, S., Gonz´ alez Merino, B., Jim´ enez, C. H., Villa, R.:Rogers-Shephard and local Loomis–Whitney type inequalities. Math. Ann. 374, 1719-1771 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [3]

    H., Villa, R.:Rogers–Shephard inequality for log- concave functions

    Alonso-Guti´ errez, D., Gonz´ alez Merino, B., Jim´ enez, C. H., Villa, R.:Rogers–Shephard inequality for log- concave functions. J. Funct. Anal. 271, 3269-3299 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [4]

    H., Villa, R.:John’s Ellipsoid and the Integral Ratio of a Log-Concave Function

    Alonso-Guti´ errez, D., Merino, B.G., Jim´ enez, C. H., Villa, R.:John’s Ellipsoid and the Integral Ratio of a Log-Concave Function. J. Geom. Anal. 28, 1182-1201 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [5]

    51, 33-48 (2004)

    Artstein-Avidan, S., Klartag, B., Milman, V.: The Santal´ o point of a function, and a functional form of the Santal´ o inequality.Mathematika. 51, 33-48 (2004)

    work page 2004

  7. [6]

    Artstein-Avidan, S., Klartag, B., Sch¨ utt, C., Werner, E.: Functional affine-isoperimetry and an inverse logarithmic Sobolev inequality. J. Funct. Anal. 262, 4181-4204 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [7]

    Avriel, M.: r-convex functions. Math. Program. 2(1), 309-323 (1972)

    work page 1972

Show all 63 references
  1. [8]

    J., Colesanti, A., Yang, D.: The Lp-Minkowski problem for −n < p <1

    Bianchi, G., B¨ or¨ oczky, K. J., Colesanti, A., Yang, D.: The Lp-Minkowski problem for −n < p <1. Adv. Math. 341, 493-535 (2019)

    2019

  2. [9]

    Borell, C.: Convex measures on locally convex spaces. Ark. Mat. 12(1-2), 239-252 (1974)

    1974

  3. [10]

    Borell, C.: Convex set functions in d-space. Period. Math. Hungar. 6(2), 111-136 (1975)

    1975

  4. [11]

    J., Lutwak, E., Yang, D., Zhang, G.:The logarithmic Minkowski problem

    B¨ or¨ oczky, K. J., Lutwak, E., Yang, D., Zhang, G.:The logarithmic Minkowski problem. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 26, 831-852 (2013)

    2013

  5. [12]

    J., Lutwak, E., Yang, D., Zhang, G., Zhao, Y.:The Gauss Image Problem

    B¨ or¨ oczky, K. J., Lutwak, E., Yang, D., Zhang, G., Zhao, Y.:The Gauss Image Problem. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 73, 1406-1452 (2020)

    2020

  6. [13]

    Bouchitt´ e, G., Valadier, M.: Integral representation of convex functionals on a space of measures. J. Funct. Anal. 80, 398-420 (1988)

    1988

  7. [14]

    J., Lieb, E

    Brascamp, H. J., Lieb, E. J.: On extensions of the Brunn-Minkowski and Pr´ ekopa-Leindler theorems, includ- ing inequalities for log concave functions, and with an application to the diffusion equation. J. Funct. Anal. 22(4), 366-389 (1976)

    1976

  8. [15]

    Brenier, Y.: Polar factorization and monotone rearrangement of vector-valued functions. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 44, 375-417 (1991)

    1991

  9. [16]

    M.:Functional Versions ofLp-Affine Surface Area and Entropy Inequalities

    Caglar, U., Fradelizi, M., Gu´ edon, O., Lehec, J., Sch¨ utt, C., Werner, E. M.:Functional Versions ofLp-Affine Surface Area and Entropy Inequalities. Int. Math. Res. Not. 4, 1223-1250 (2016)

    2016

  10. [17]

    M.: Divergence for s-concave and log concave functions

    Caglar, U., Werner, E. M.: Divergence for s-concave and log concave functions. Adv. Math. 257, 219-247 (2014)

    2014

  11. [18]

    M.: Mixed f-divergence and inequalities for log-concave functions

    Caglar, U., Werner, E. M.: Mixed f-divergence and inequalities for log-concave functions. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 110, 271-290 (2015)

    2015

  12. [19]

    Chen, S., Li, Q., Zhu, G.: The logarithmic Minkowski problem for non-symmetric measures. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 371, 2623-2641 (2019)

    2019

  13. [20]

    Colesanti, A., Fragal` a, I.:The first variation of the total mass of log-concave functions and related inequalities. Adv. Math. 244, 708-749 (2013)

    2013

  14. [21]

    Cordero-Erausquin, D., Klartag, B.: Moment measures. J. Funct. Anal. 268, 3834-3866 (2015)

    2015

  15. [22]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (2019)

    Durrett, R.: Probability: Theory and Examples. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (2019)

    2019

  16. [23]

    http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16929, (2025)

    Falah, T., Rotem, L.: On the functional Minkowski problem. http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16929, (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Fang, N., Xing, S., Ye, D.: Geometry of log-concave functions: the Lp Asplund sum and the Lp Minkowski problem, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 61, 2 (2022). A MINKOWSKI PROBLEM FOR α-CONCAVE FUNCTIONS VIA OPTIMAL TRANSPORT 43

    2022

  18. [26]

    Fang, N., Ye, D., Zhang, Z., Zhao, Y.: Dual Orlicz curvature measures for log-concave functions and their Minkowski problems. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 64, 44 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    EMS Press, Berlin, (2021)

    Figalli, A., Glaudo, F.: An Invitation to Optimal Transport, Wasserstein Distances, and Gradient Flows. EMS Press, Berlin, (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    B.: Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications

    Folland, G. B.: Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, (1999)

    1999

  21. [29]

    Fradelizi, M., Meyer, M.: Some functional forms of Blaschke-Santal´ o-inequality. Math. Z. 256, 379-395 (2007)

    2007

  22. [30]

    Fradelizi, M., Meyer, M.: Some functional inverse Santal´ o inequalities.Adv. Math. 218, 1430-1452 (2008)

    2008

  23. [31]

    J.: The geometry of optimal transportation

    Gangbo, W., McCann, R. J.: The geometry of optimal transportation. Acta. Math. 177, 113-161 (1996)

    1996

  24. [32]

    J., Hug, D., Weil, W., Xing, S., Ye, D.: General volumes in the Orlicz-Brunn–Minkowski theory and a related Minkowski problem I

    Gardner, R. J., Hug, D., Weil, W., Xing, S., Ye, D.: General volumes in the Orlicz-Brunn–Minkowski theory and a related Minkowski problem I. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 58, 12 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Huang, Y., Liu, J., Xi, D., Zhao, Y.: Dual curvature measures for log-concave functions. J. Differential Geom. 128, 815-860 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Huang, Y., Lutwak, E., Yang, D., Zhang, G.: Geometric measures in the dual Brunn-Minkowski theory and their associated Minkowski problems. Acta. Math. 216, 325-388 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    Huang, Y., Lutwak, E., Yang, D., Zhang, G.: The Lp-Aleksandrov problem for Lp-integral curvature. J. Differential Geom. 110, 1-29 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    Huang, Y., Xi, D., Zhao, Y.: The Minkowski problem in Gaussian probability space. Adv. Math. 385, 107769 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Journal of Convex Analysis

    Huynh, K., Santambrogio, F.: q-moment measures and applications: a new approach via optimal transport . Journal of Convex Analysis. 28 (4), 1033-1052 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Ivanov, G., Nasz´ odi, M.:Functional John ellipsoids. J. Funct. Anal. 282, 109441 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    D.: Geometry of Log-concave Functions and Measures

    Klartag, B., Milman, V. D.: Geometry of Log-concave Functions and Measures. Geom. Dedicata. 112, 169- 182 (2005)

    2005

  32. [40]

    S.: On the optimal mapping of distributions

    Knott, M., Smith, C. S.: On the optimal mapping of distributions. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 43, 39-49 (1984)

    1984

  33. [41]

    Lehec, J.: Partitions and functional Santal´ o inequalities.Arch. Math. (Basel) 92, 89-94 (2009)

    2009

  34. [42]

    M.: Floating functions

    Li, B., Sch¨ utt, C., Werner, E. M.: Floating functions. Israel J. Math. 231, 181-210 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    M.: The L¨ owner Function of a Log-Concave Function

    Li, B., Sch¨ utt, C., Werner, E. M.: The L¨ owner Function of a Log-Concave Function. J. Geom. Anal. 31, 423-456 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Lutwak, E.: The Brunn-Minkowski-Firey theory. I. Mixed volumes and the Minkowski problem. J. Differential Geom. 38, 131-150 (1993)

    1993

  37. [45]

    Lutwak, E., Xi, D., Yang, D., Zhang, G.: Chord measures in integral geometry and their Minkowski problems. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 77, 3277-3330 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    J.: Polar factorization of maps on Riemannian manifolds

    McCann, R. J.: Polar factorization of maps on Riemannian manifolds. Geom. Funct. Anal. 11, 589-608 (2001)

    2001

  39. [47]

    Electron

    Milman, V., Rotem, L.: α-concave functions and a functional extension of mixed volumes. Electron. Res. Announc. Math. Sci. 20, 1-11 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    (ed.) Ausgew¨ ahlte Arbeiten zur Zahlentheorie und zur Geometrie: Mit D

    Minkowski, H.: Allgemeine Lehrs¨ atze ¨ uber die konvexen Polyeder.In: Minkowski, H. (ed.) Ausgew¨ ahlte Arbeiten zur Zahlentheorie und zur Geometrie: Mit D. Hilberts Ged¨ achtnisrede auf H. Minkowski, G¨ ottingen

  41. [49]

    Minkowski, H.: Volumen und Oberfl¨ ache, Math. Ann. 57, 447-495 (1903)

    1903

  42. [50]

    T.: Convex Analysis

    Rockafellar, R. T.: Convex Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, (1970)

    1970

  43. [51]

    Rotem, L.: Support functions and mean width for α-concave functions. Adv. Math. 243, 168-186 (2013)

    2013

  44. [52]

    Rotem, L.: Surface area measures of log-concave functions. J. Anal. Math. 147, 373-400 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    In: Eldan, R., Klartag, B., Litvak, A., and Milman, E

    Rotem, L.: The Anisotropic Total Variation and Surface Area Measures. In: Eldan, R., Klartag, B., Litvak, A., and Milman, E. (eds.) Geometric Aspects of Functional Analysis: Israel Seminar (GAFA) 2020-2022, Springer, Cham, 297-312 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Roysdon, M., Xing, S.: On the framework of Lp summations for functions. J. Funct. Anal. 285, 110150 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Cham, (2015)

    Santambrogio, F.: Optimal Transport for Applied Mathematicians: Calculus of Variations, PDEs, and Mod- eling. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Cham, (2015)

    2015

  48. [56]

    Santambrogio, F.: Dealing with moment measures via entropy and optimal transport. J. Funct. Anal. 271, 418-436 (2016). 44 LI, NGUYEN, AND YE

    2016

  49. [57]

    Schneider, R.: Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (2014)

    2014

  50. [58]

    Ulivelli, J.: First variation of functional Wulff shapes , http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11172, (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, (2003)

    Villani, C.: Topics in Optimal Transportation. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, (2003)

    2003

  52. [60]

    Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (2009)

    Villani, C.: Optimal Transport: Old and New. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (2009)

    2009

  53. [61]

    Zhao, Y.: The dual Minkowski problem for negative indices. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 56, 18 (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    Zhu, G.: The Lp-Minkowski problem for polytopes for 0<p< 1. J. Funct. Anal. 269, 1070-1094 (2015). Xiao Li, School of Mathematical Science, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, 401331, China Email address: lxlixiaolx@163.com Nguyen Dac Khoi Nguyen, Department of Mathematics...

    2015

  55. [1909]

    Springer, Vienna (1989)

    121-139. Springer, Vienna (1989)

    1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.