Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

AI-AI Bias: large language models favor communications generated by large language models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.12856 v2 pith:XP4RJF7B submitted 2024-07-09 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CYcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CYcs.LG
keywords llmsmodelshumanslanguagelargecommunicationsdiscriminationfavor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Are large language models (LLMs) biased in favor of communications produced by LLMs, leading to possible antihuman discrimination? Using a classical experimental design inspired by employment discrimination studies, we tested widely used LLMs, including GPT-3.5, GPT-4 and a selection of recent open-weight models in binary choice scenarios. These involved LLM-based assistants selecting between goods (the goods we study include consumer products, academic papers, and film-viewings) described either by humans or LLMs. Our results show a consistent tendency for LLM-based AIs to prefer LLM-presented options. This suggests the possibility of future AI systems implicitly discriminating against humans as a class, giving AI agents and AI-assisted humans an unfair advantage.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions

    cs.GT 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    LLM sellers in a simulated double auction collude more when they can communicate, and urgency from an authority figure sustains collusion even when an overseer monitors them.

Pith tools