Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Irony in Emojis: A Comparative Study of Human and LLM Interpretation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.11241 v1 pith:XT6YW7NO submitted 2025-01-20 cs.CL cs.CVcs.SI

classification cs.CLcs.CVcs.SI
keywords emojisgpt-4ohumanironyfactorsinterpretationlanguagenuanced
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Emojis have become a universal language in online communication, often carrying nuanced and context-dependent meanings. Among these, irony poses a significant challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs) due to its inherent incongruity between appearance and intent. This study examines the ability of GPT-4o to interpret irony in emojis. By prompting GPT-4o to evaluate the likelihood of specific emojis being used to express irony on social media and comparing its interpretations with human perceptions, we aim to bridge the gap between machine and human understanding. Our findings reveal nuanced insights into GPT-4o's interpretive capabilities, highlighting areas of alignment with and divergence from human behavior. Additionally, this research underscores the importance of demographic factors, such as age and gender, in shaping emoji interpretation and evaluates how these factors influence GPT-4o's performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Smiley Turns Hostile: Interpreting How Emojis Trigger LLMs' Toxicity

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Emojis in harmful prompts bypass LLM safety more effectively than plain text, across 7 models and 5 languages, through a heterogeneous tokenization channel.

Pith tools