Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

DePrompt: Desensitization and Evaluation of Personal Identifiable Information in Large Language Model Prompts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.08930 v1 pith:YG3FF6PG submitted 2024-08-16 cs.CR cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.CL
keywords modelprivacypromptdesensitizationevaluationlargepromptsprotection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Prompt serves as a crucial link in interacting with large language models (LLMs), widely impacting the accuracy and interpretability of model outputs. However, acquiring accurate and high-quality responses necessitates precise prompts, which inevitably pose significant risks of personal identifiable information (PII) leakage. Therefore, this paper proposes DePrompt, a desensitization protection and effectiveness evaluation framework for prompt, enabling users to safely and transparently utilize LLMs. Specifically, by leveraging large model fine-tuning techniques as the underlying privacy protection method, we integrate contextual attributes to define privacy types, achieving high-precision PII entity identification. Additionally, through the analysis of key features in prompt desensitization scenarios, we devise adversarial generative desensitization methods that retain important semantic content while disrupting the link between identifiers and privacy attributes. Furthermore, we present utility evaluation metrics for prompt to better gauge and balance privacy and usability. Our framework is adaptable to prompts and can be extended to text usability-dependent scenarios. Through comparison with benchmarks and other model methods, experimental evaluations demonstrate that our desensitized prompt exhibit superior privacy protection utility and model inference results.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Combating Knowledge Corruption in Agent Systems: A Byzantine-Tolerant Secure Collaborative RAG Framework

    cs.CR 2026-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    SecureCollaRAG filters poisoned RAG documents with dynamic GNN credibility scoring, but its formal proof depends on an assumed cluster separation that the introduced ATA attack is designed to violate.

  2. LLM Access Shield: Domain-Specific LLM Framework for Privacy Policy Compliance

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An enterprise proxy that detects sensitive data in LLM prompts with a fine-tuned small model and replaces it with format-preserving encryption.

Pith tools