Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Slow-Growing Trees

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.01926 v2 pith:ZAGHU73U submitted 2021-03-02 stat.ML cs.LGecon.EMstat.AP

Slow-Growing Trees

classification stat.ML cs.LGecon.EMstat.AP
keywords learningtreetreesboogingcartgreedyperformancerandom
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Random Forest's performance can be matched by a single slow-growing tree (SGT), which uses a learning rate to tame CART's greedy algorithm. SGT exploits the view that CART is an extreme case of an iterative weighted least square procedure. Moreover, a unifying view of Boosted Trees (BT) and Random Forests (RF) is presented. Greedy ML algorithms' outcomes can be improved using either "slow learning" or diversification. SGT applies the former to estimate a single deep tree, and Booging (bagging stochastic BT with a high learning rate) uses the latter with additive shallow trees. The performance of this tree ensemble quaternity (Booging, BT, SGT, RF) is assessed on simulated and real regression tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.