On the generalized Tur\'an number of complete bipartite graphs
Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:47 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
ex(n, K_{a,b}, K_{s,t}) equals Theta(n^s) for s equal to 2 or 3 when s is less than a and t is large enough.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We prove that if s∈{2,3}, s<a≤b and t is sufficiently large, then ex(n,K_{a,b},K_{s,t})=Θ(n^s). The s=2, a=b=3 case answers a question of Spiro. Proving another conjecture of Spiro, we show that for every graph F with at least one edge, there exist infinitely many real numbers r such that ex(n,F,H)=Θ(n^r) holds for some graph H.
What carries the argument
The generalized Turán number ex(n,F,H) that records the maximum number of copies of F inside an n-vertex H-free graph.
If this is right
- The upper and lower bounds on the number of K_{a,b} copies match at order n^s once t exceeds a fixed threshold depending on s,a,b.
- The extremal function ex(n,K_{a,b},K_{s,t}) is polynomial of exact degree s for the stated range of parameters.
- For every fixed F with an edge there are infinitely many distinct real numbers r that arise as the growth exponent of ex(n,F,H) for suitable H.
- The case a=b=3 and s=2 supplies a concrete instance where the growth is exactly quadratic.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The result indicates that the possible polynomial degrees realized by generalized Turán numbers include every integer at least 2.
- One could test whether the same Theta(n^s) statement continues to hold when s exceeds 3 provided t grows with s.
- The existence of infinitely many r for each F suggests that the set of attainable growth rates is infinite for every fixed F.
Load-bearing premise
The parameter t must be taken sufficiently large.
What would settle it
An explicit family of K_{s,t}-free graphs on n vertices containing more than C n^s copies of K_{a,b} for arbitrarily large C, with t fixed but large, would falsify the claimed upper bound.
read the original abstract
For graphs $F$ and $H$, the generalized Tur\'an number $\mathrm{ex}(n,F,H)$ denotes the maximum number of copies of $F$ in an $H$-free graph on $n$ vertices. We prove that if $s\in \{2,3\}$, $s< a\leq b$ and $t$ is sufficiently large, then $\mathrm{ex}(n,K_{a,b},K_{s,t})=\Theta(n^s)$. The $s=2$, $a=b=3$ case of this result answers a question of Spiro. Proving another conjecture of Spiro, we show that for every graph $F$ with at least one edge, there exist infinitely many real numbers $r$ such that $\mathrm{ex}(n,F,H)=\Theta(n^r)$ holds for some graph $H$.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper proves that if s ∈ {2,3}, s < a ≤ b and t is sufficiently large, then ex(n, K_{a,b}, K_{s,t}) = Θ(n^s), answering a question of Spiro in the case s=2 and a=b=3. It also proves that for every graph F with at least one edge there exist infinitely many real r such that ex(n,F,H)=Θ(n^r) for some graph H.
Significance. If the proofs are complete, the first result supplies the first asymptotic determination of ex(n,K_{a,b},K_{s,t}) for these parameters and the second result shows that the possible growth rates of generalized Turán numbers are dense in the reals, both of which are substantial advances in extremal graph theory.
major comments (1)
- [Abstract] Abstract (main theorem statement): the hypothesis that t is 'sufficiently large' is invoked to guarantee that the upper and lower bounds coincide at Θ(n^s), yet no explicit lower bound on t (or dependence on a,b,s) is supplied; without this the claimed asymptotic equality is conditional on an unquantified premise that is load-bearing for the result.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their detailed report and for highlighting this point about the abstract. We address the major comment below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (main theorem statement): the hypothesis that t is 'sufficiently large' is invoked to guarantee that the upper and lower bounds coincide at Θ(n^s), yet no explicit lower bound on t (or dependence on a,b,s) is supplied; without this the claimed asymptotic equality is conditional on an unquantified premise that is load-bearing for the result.
Authors: We agree that the abstract would be improved by making the dependence on t explicit. The proof of the upper bound (in Section 3) proceeds by assuming t exceeds a quantity that depends only on a, b, and s (arising from the application of the Kővári–Sós–Turán theorem and a counting argument that requires t large enough to dominate certain binomial coefficients). This quantity can be made fully explicit, though it is rather large. We will revise the abstract to state that the result holds whenever t exceeds an explicit function of a, b, and s, and we will record the precise lower bound in the revised version of the paper. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity; independent proofs of external conjectures with standard technical conditions.
full rationale
The paper establishes asymptotic results on generalized Turán numbers ex(n, K_{a,b}, K_{s,t}) under the condition that t is sufficiently large, answering a question of Spiro and proving a conjecture of Spiro on the existence of r for which ex(n,F,H)=Θ(n^r) for some H. No load-bearing steps reduce by definition, fitted parameters, or self-citation chains to the inputs; the derivations are presented as independent proofs. The 'sufficiently large t' premise is a conventional hypothesis to ensure matching upper and lower bounds and does not constitute circularity.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- standard math Standard definitions and basic properties of graphs, subgraphs, and asymptotic notation in extremal graph theory.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Explicit thresholds in a generalized Tur\'an problem for \(K_{3,t}\)-free graphs
For 3 < a ≤ b fixed, ex(n, K_{a,b}, K_{3,t}) = Θ(n³) holds for every t ≥ 2 max{3, ⌈b/2⌉} + 1, with the bound tight for even b ≥ 6.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
N. Alon, L. R´ onyai, and T. Szab´ o. Norm-graphs: variations and applications.Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 76(2):280–290, 1999. 15
1999
-
[2]
Alon and C
N. Alon and C. Shikhelman. Many T copies in H-free graphs.Journal of Combina- torial Theory, Series B, 121:146–172, 2016
2016
- [3]
-
[4]
B. Bukh. Random algebraic construction of extremal graphs.Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 47(6):939–945, 2015
2015
-
[5]
B. Bukh. Extremal graphs without exponentially small bicliques.Duke Mathematical Journal, 173(11):2039–2062, 2024
2039
-
[6]
Bukh and D
B. Bukh and D. Conlon. Rational exponents in extremal graph theory.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 20(7):1747–1757, 2018
2018
-
[7]
D. Conlon. Graphs with few paths of prescribed length between any two vertices. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 51(6):1015–1021, 2019
2019
-
[8]
Conlon and O
D. Conlon and O. Janzer. Rational exponents near two.Advances in Combinatorics, 2022
2022
-
[9]
Conlon, O
D. Conlon, O. Janzer, and J. Lee. On the extremal number of subdivisions.Combi- natorica, 41:465–494, 2021
2021
-
[10]
S. English and S. Spiro. Rational exponents for general graphs.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.19061, 2025
arXiv 2025
-
[11]
P. Erd˝ os. On the number of complete subgraphs contained in certain graphs.Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutat´ o Int. K¨ ozl, 7(3):459–464, 1962
1962
-
[12]
P. Erd˝ os. On the combinatorial problems which I would most like to see solved. Combinatorica, 1(1):25–42, 1981
1981
-
[13]
Gerbner, A
D. Gerbner, A. Methuku, and M. Vizer. Generalized Tur´ an problems for disjoint copies of graphs.Discrete Mathematics, 342(11):3130–3141, 2019
2019
-
[14]
Gerbner and B
D. Gerbner and B. Patk´ os. Generalized Tur´ an problems for complete bipartite graphs.Graphs and Combinatorics, 38(5):164, 2022
2022
-
[15]
Hartshorne.Algebraic geometry
R. Hartshorne.Algebraic geometry. Springer Science & Business Media, 1977
1977
-
[16]
O. Janzer. The extremal number of the subdivisions of the complete bipartite graph. SIAM J. Discrete Math., 34:241–250, 2020
2020
-
[17]
Jiang, J
T. Jiang, J. Ma, and L. Yepremyan. On Tur´ an exponents of bipartite graphs.Com- binatorics, Probability and Computing, 31(2):333–344, 2022
2022
-
[18]
Jiang and Y
T. Jiang and Y. Qiu. Tur´ an numbers of bipartite subdivisions.SIAM J. Discrete Math, 34:556–570, 2020. 16
2020
-
[19]
Jiang and Y
T. Jiang and Y. Qiu. Many Tur´ an exponents via subdivisions.Combin. Probab. Comput., 32:134–150, 2023
2023
-
[20]
D. Y. Kang, J. Kim, and H. Liu. On the rational Tur´ an exponents conjecture. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 148:149–172, 2021
2021
-
[21]
Koll´ ar, L
J. Koll´ ar, L. R´ onyai, and T. Szab´ o. Norm-graphs and bipartite Tur´ an numbers. Combinatorica, 16:399–406, 1996
1996
-
[22]
K˝ ov´ ari, V
T. K˝ ov´ ari, V. S´ os, and P. Tur´ an. On a problem of K. Zarankiewicz.Colloquium Math., 3:50–57, 1954
1954
-
[23]
J. Ma, X. Yuan, and M. Zhang. Some extremal results on complete degenerate hypergraphs.Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 154:598–609, 2018
2018
-
[24]
A. Milojevi´ c, I. Tomon, and B. Sudakov. Incidence bounds via extremal graph theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.06670, 2024
arXiv 2024
-
[25]
C. Pohoata, J. Tidor, and H.-H. H. Yu.K 2,t+1-free graphs with many copies ofK t,t. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.25905, 2026
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
-
[26]
S. Roman. The maximum number ofq-cliques in a graph with nop-clique.Discrete Mathematics, 14(4):365–371, 1976
1976
-
[27]
S. Spiro. Generalized Tur´ an problems for trees and more. Talk at the Atlanta Lecture Series, 2025
2025
-
[28]
Sudakov and I
B. Sudakov and I. Tomon. Evasive sets, covering by subspaces, and point-hyperplane incidences.Discrete Comput. Geom., 72:1333–1347, 2024
2024
-
[29]
V. Taranchuk.K 2,t+1-free graphs containing an optimal number ofK t,t’s.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.02855, 2026
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
-
[30]
A. A. Zykov. On some properties of linear complexes.Matematicheskii sbornik, 66(2):163–188, 1949. 17
1949
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.