pith. sign in

arxiv: math/0512134 · v2 · submitted 2005-12-06 · 🧮 math.NT · math.CO

Frobenius problem and the covering radius of a lattice

classification 🧮 math.NT math.CO
keywords numberfrobeniusboundcoveringintegerslatticeproblemradius
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Let $N \geq2$ and let $1 < a_1 < ... < a_N$ be relatively prime integers. Frobenius number of this $N$-tuple is defined to be the largest positive integer that cannot be expressed as $\sum_{i=1}^N a_i x_i$ where $x_1,...,x_N$ are non-negative integers. The condition that $gcd(a_1,...,a_N)=1$ implies that such number exists. The general problem of determining the Frobenius number given $N$ and $a_1,...,a_N$ is NP-hard, but there has been a number of different bounds on the Frobenius number produced by various authors. We use techniques from the geometry of numbers to produce a new bound, relating Frobenius number to the covering radius of the null-lattice of this $N$-tuple. Our bound is particularly interesting in the case when this lattice has equal successive minima, which, as we prove, happens infinitely often.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.