pith. sign in

arxiv: 1001.3162 · v2 · pith:2WOYRPLLnew · submitted 2010-01-18 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

The Large Scale Bias of Dark Matter Halos: Numerical Calibration and Model Tests

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords biashalosmassmodelresultsdarkdeltafind
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We measure the clustering of dark matter halos in a large set of collisionless cosmological simulations of the flat LCDM cosmology. Halos are identified using the spherical overdensity algorithm, which finds the mass around isolated peaks in the density field such that the mean density is Delta times the background. We calibrate fitting functions for the large scale bias that are adaptable to any value of Delta we examine. We find a ~6% scatter about our best fit bias relation. Our fitting functions couple to the halo mass functions of Tinker et. al. (2008) such that bias of all dark matter is normalized to unity. We demonstrate that the bias of massive, rare halos is higher than that predicted in the modified ellipsoidal collapse model of Sheth, Mo, & Tormen (2001), and approaches the predictions of the spherical collapse model for the rarest halos. Halo bias results based on friends-of-friends halos identified with linking length 0.2 are systematically lower than for halos with the canonical Delta=200 overdensity by ~10%. In contrast to our previous results on the mass function, we find that the universal bias function evolves very weakly with redshift, if at all. We use our numerical results, both for the mass function and the bias relation, to test the peak-background split model for halo bias. We find that the peak-background split achieves a reasonable agreement with the numerical results, but ~20% residuals remain, both at high and low masses.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing nonlinear structure formation beyond $\Lambda$CDM with the LSS bootstrap: a joint power spectrum and bispectrum analysis

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First MCMC constraints on LSS bootstrap parameters yield ~7% precision on linear growth modifications and ~57% on quadratic kernel modifications from BOSS data, improving to 1% and 25% with larger simulations.

  2. FLAMINGO: The thermal history of the Universe from tSZ effect cross-correlations and its dependencies on cosmology and baryon physics

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    tSZ cross-correlations with large-scale structure tracers prefer low S8 and strong baryonic feedback, yielding S8 = 0.72 and low group baryon fraction in FLAMINGO simulations.

  3. FLAMINGO: The thermal history of the Universe from tSZ effect cross-correlations and its dependencies on cosmology and baryon physics

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FLAMINGO simulations show tSZ cross-correlations scale as S8 to the power of about 3 and favor low S8=0.72 with strong feedback when compared to SDSS, BOSS, DES, and Planck data.

  4. Impact of projection-induced optical selection bias on the weak lensing mass calibration of galaxy clusters

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Projection-induced selection bias causes 20-50% overestimation of weak lensing masses for optically selected galaxy clusters, larger on scales >3 Mpc.

  5. DEMNUni: the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect in the presence of massive neutrinos and dynamical dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    N-body simulations show the log Compton-y distribution mean decreases linearly with neutrino fraction (slope ~10 f_ν) and tSZ power spectrum scales as power law in σ8^cb (exponents 7.3-8.1), with ∑m_ν=0.16 or 0.32 eV ...

  6. An Improved Fit for Linear Halo Bias at High Redshift

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    An updated linear halo bias fit calibrated on high-redshift simulations reduces systematic offsets in early-universe clustering predictions to under 1%.

  7. Comparison of Halo Model and Simulation Predictions for Projected-Field Kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Cross-Correlations

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Halo model predictions match Websky simulations well for Planck filters but differ by ~20% for Simons Observatory filters, exceeding error bars and consistent with missing higher-order terms in the kSZ signal.