On Causal and Anticausal Learning
read the original abstract
We consider the problem of function estimation in the case where an underlying causal model can be inferred. This has implications for popular scenarios such as covariate shift, concept drift, transfer learning and semi-supervised learning. We argue that causal knowledge may facilitate some approaches for a given problem, and rule out others. In particular, we formulate a hypothesis for when semi-supervised learning can help, and corroborate it with empirical results.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
The Pragmatic Frames of Spurious Correlations in Machine Learning: Interpreting How and Why They Matter
ML researchers assess spurious correlations via four pragmatic frames (relevance, generalizability, human-likeness, harmfulness) rather than a fixed statistical definition.
-
Batch-Adaptive Causal Annotations
Derives closed-form optimal batch sampling probabilities to minimize asymptotic variance of doubly robust ATE estimator with missing outcomes, achieving lower MSE and matching full-sample precision with 75% fewer labe...
-
Beyond Instance-Level Self-Supervision in 3D Multi-Modal Medical Imaging
A self-supervised approach uses consistent spatial relationships of anatomical structures across patients to improve 3D multi-modal medical image representations, yielding modest gains on segmentation and classificati...
-
CausalDisenSeg: A Causality-Guided Disentanglement Framework with Counterfactual Reasoning for Robust Brain Tumor Segmentation Under Missing Modalities
CausalDisenSeg uses causality-guided disentanglement via CVAE with HSIC, a Region Causality Module, and counterfactual reasoning to achieve robust brain tumor segmentation under missing MRI modalities, reporting 84.49...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.