Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Algorithms for leader selection in stochastically forced consensus networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1302.0450 v2 pith:2MSEXARN submitted 2013-02-03 math.OC cs.ROcs.SYeess.SY

Algorithms for leader selection in stochastically forced consensus networks

classification math.OC cs.ROcs.SYeess.SY
keywords networksleadersconstraintsalgorithmalgorithmsbooleanboundconsensus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We are interested in assigning a pre-specified number of nodes as leaders in order to minimize the mean-square deviation from consensus in stochastically forced networks. This problem arises in several applications including control of vehicular formations and localization in sensor networks. For networks with leaders subject to noise, we show that the Boolean constraints (a node is either a leader or it is not) are the only source of nonconvexity. By relaxing these constraints to their convex hull we obtain a lower bound on the global optimal value. We also use a simple but efficient greedy algorithm to identify leaders and to compute an upper bound. For networks with leaders that perfectly follow their desired trajectories, we identify an additional source of nonconvexity in the form of a rank constraint. Removal of the rank constraint and relaxation of the Boolean constraints yields a semidefinite program for which we develop a customized algorithm well-suited for large networks. Several examples ranging from regular lattices to random graphs are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the developed algorithms.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How Much Does Correctness Cost? Budgeted Placement of Strong Correctors in a Weak Multi-Agent Swarm

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    Heterogeneous cost-coupled corrector placement in a consensus swarm stays submodular, so cost-benefit greedy is near-optimal, and cost-quality curvature decides few-strong versus many-medium oracles in a task-dependent way.