Recognition: unknown
word2vec Explained: deriving Mikolov et al.'s negative-sampling word-embedding method
read the original abstract
The word2vec software of Tomas Mikolov and colleagues (https://code.google.com/p/word2vec/ ) has gained a lot of traction lately, and provides state-of-the-art word embeddings. The learning models behind the software are described in two research papers. We found the description of the models in these papers to be somewhat cryptic and hard to follow. While the motivations and presentation may be obvious to the neural-networks language-modeling crowd, we had to struggle quite a bit to figure out the rationale behind the equations. This note is an attempt to explain equation (4) (negative sampling) in "Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality" by Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado and Jeffrey Dean.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Models
Linear representations of high-level concepts in LLMs are formalized via counterfactuals in input and output spaces, unified under a causal inner product that enables consistent probing and steering.
-
TIDE: Every Layer Knows the Token Beneath the Context
TIDE augments standard transformers with per-layer token embedding injection via an ensemble of memory blocks and a depth-conditioned router to mitigate rare-token undertraining and contextual collapse.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.