Recognition: unknown
Domain Recursion for Lifted Inference with Existential Quantifiers
read the original abstract
In recent work, we proved that the domain recursion inference rule makes domain-lifted inference possible on several relational probability models (RPMs) for which the best known time complexity used to be exponential. We also identified two classes of RPMs for which inference becomes domain lifted when using domain recursion. These two classes subsume the largest lifted classes that were previously known. In this paper, we show that domain recursion can also be applied to models with existential quantifiers. Currently, all lifted inference algorithms assume that existential quantifiers have been removed in pre-processing by Skolemization. We show that besides introducing potentially inconvenient negative weights, Skolemization may increase the time complexity of inference. We give two example models where domain recursion can replace Skolemization, avoids the need for dealing with negative numbers, and reduces the time complexity of inference. These two examples may be interesting from three theoretical aspects: 1- they provide a better and deeper understanding of domain recursion and, in general, (lifted) inference, 2- they may serve as evidence that there are larger classes of models for which domain recursion can satisfyingly replace Skolemization, and 3- they may serve as evidence that better Skolemization techniques exist.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Fast Model Counting Algorithm for Two-Variable Logic with Counting and Modulo Counting Quantifiers
IncrementalWFOMC3 computes WFOMC on C² in time linear in counting parameters (tighter than prior quadratic) and proves domain-liftability for the richer C²_mod fragment while delivering large empirical speedups.
-
On Knowledge Compilation For Two-Variable First-Order Logic
FO2 groundings can require 2^Ω(n) DNNF size, but a type-based compiler with residual caching often yields smaller circuits and faster runtimes than naive grounding.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.