REVIEW 1 cited by
Sparse-to-Dense: Depth Prediction from Sparse Depth Samples and a Single Image
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Sparse-to-Dense: Depth Prediction from Sparse Depth Samples and a Single Image
read the original abstract
We consider the problem of dense depth prediction from a sparse set of depth measurements and a single RGB image. Since depth estimation from monocular images alone is inherently ambiguous and unreliable, to attain a higher level of robustness and accuracy, we introduce additional sparse depth samples, which are either acquired with a low-resolution depth sensor or computed via visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) algorithms. We propose the use of a single deep regression network to learn directly from the RGB-D raw data, and explore the impact of number of depth samples on prediction accuracy. Our experiments show that, compared to using only RGB images, the addition of 100 spatially random depth samples reduces the prediction root-mean-square error by 50% on the NYU-Depth-v2 indoor dataset. It also boosts the percentage of reliable prediction from 59% to 92% on the KITTI dataset. We demonstrate two applications of the proposed algorithm: a plug-in module in SLAM to convert sparse maps to dense maps, and super-resolution for LiDARs. Software and video demonstration are publicly available.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Multipath Blind Spot: $K$-Agnostic Robust Calibration for Sparse-Anchor Metric Depth from Frozen Foundations
MRAC gates sparse anchors via Theil–Sen + MAD consistency with a frozen foundation's relative depth, repairing multipath outliers that collapse residual-on-CFA and blind VI-Depth while winning 84% of same-backbone cells.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.