pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1710.05006 · v3 · submitted 2017-10-13 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: unknown

Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the 2017 International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords challengeskinanalysisdetectiondevelopmentimaginginternationallesion
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This article describes the design, implementation, and results of the latest installment of the dermoscopic image analysis benchmark challenge. The goal is to support research and development of algorithms for automated diagnosis of melanoma, the most lethal skin cancer. The challenge was divided into 3 tasks: lesion segmentation, feature detection, and disease classification. Participation involved 593 registrations, 81 pre-submissions, 46 finalized submissions (including a 4-page manuscript), and approximately 50 attendees, making this the largest standardized and comparative study in this field to date. While the official challenge duration and ranking of participants has concluded, the dataset snapshots remain available for further research and development.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. E-TCAV: Formalizing Penultimate Proxies for Efficient Concept Based Interpretability

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    E-TCAV shows that penultimate-layer proxies yield TCAV scores agreeing with earlier layers while delivering linear speedups in computation.

  2. Deep neural networks with Fisher vector encoding for medical image classification

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Fisher vector encoding integrated into CNN-ViT hybrids outperforms benchmarks on MedMNIST datasets and matches literature results on other medical image sets.

  3. MedGemma 1.5 Technical Report

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    MedGemma 1.5 4B reports absolute gains of 11% on 3D MRI classification, 3% on 3D CT, 47% macro F1 on pathology slides, 35% IoU on anatomical localization, and 5-22% on clinical QA tasks over MedGemma 1.