Recognition: unknown
The Intriguing Properties of Model Explanations
read the original abstract
Linear approximations to the decision boundary of a complex model have become one of the most popular tools for interpreting predictions. In this paper, we study such linear explanations produced either post-hoc by a few recent methods or generated along with predictions with contextual explanation networks (CENs). We focus on two questions: (i) whether linear explanations are always consistent or can be misleading, and (ii) when integrated into the prediction process, whether and how explanations affect the performance of the model. Our analysis sheds more light on certain properties of explanations produced by different methods and suggests that learning models that explain and predict jointly is often advantageous.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Generative Augmentation of Imbalanced Flight Records for Flight Diversion Prediction: A Multi-objective Optimisation Framework
Hyperparameter-optimized generative models augment scarce flight diversion records and substantially improve prediction accuracy over real data alone.
-
Synthetic Flight Data Generation Using Generative Models
Synthetic flight data generated by TVAE and Gaussian Copula models supports flight delay prediction models with accuracy comparable to real data.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.