REVIEW 3 cited by
Learning to Count Objects in Natural Images for Visual Question Answering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Learning to Count Objects in Natural Images for Visual Question Answering
read the original abstract
Visual Question Answering (VQA) models have struggled with counting objects in natural images so far. We identify a fundamental problem due to soft attention in these models as a cause. To circumvent this problem, we propose a neural network component that allows robust counting from object proposals. Experiments on a toy task show the effectiveness of this component and we obtain state-of-the-art accuracy on the number category of the VQA v2 dataset without negatively affecting other categories, even outperforming ensemble models with our single model. On a difficult balanced pair metric, the component gives a substantial improvement in counting over a strong baseline by 6.6%.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
The MixCount Dataset: Bridging the Data Gap for Open-Vocabulary Object Counting
MixCount provides a scalable synthetic dataset for mixed-object counting that improves state-of-the-art models on real benchmarks, cutting MAE by 20.14% on FSC-147 and 18.3% on PairTally.
-
HoloCount: A Holistic Visual Counting Benchmark for MLLMs
HoloCount is a three-tier visual counting benchmark showing that MLLMs fail systematically on analytical reasoning, high-density scenes, and linguistic prior conflicts, with even the best models dropping below 50% acc...
-
Blind-Spots-Bench: Evaluating Blind Spots in Multimodal Models
A 235-item multimodal stress-test shows frontier closed models outpace open-weight peers by ~10% and leaves shared failures on counting, spatial, and character-level tasks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.