pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1802.10135 · v1 · submitted 2018-02-22 · 💻 cs.CR

Recognition: unknown

Microsoft Malware Classification Challenge

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.CR
keywords datasetmalwareresearchchallengeclassificationcomparisonmicrosoftalong
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The Microsoft Malware Classification Challenge was announced in 2015 along with a publication of a huge dataset of nearly 0.5 terabytes, consisting of disassembly and bytecode of more than 20K malware samples. Apart from serving in the Kaggle competition, the dataset has become a standard benchmark for research on modeling malware behaviour. To date, the dataset has been cited in more than 50 research papers. Here we provide a high-level comparison of the publications citing the dataset. The comparison simplifies finding potential research directions in this field and future performance evaluation of the dataset.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LCC-LLM: Leveraging Code-Centric Large Language Models for Malware Attribution

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LCC-LLM creates a code-centric dataset and RAG-based LLM framework that reaches 0.634 average semantic similarity on 43 malware tasks and 10/10 pass rate in real-world case studies.