pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1906.00742 · v1 · submitted 2019-06-03 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.LG

Recognition: unknown

Gender-preserving Debiasing for Pre-trained Word Embeddings

Danushka Bollegala, Masahiro Kaneko

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.LG
keywords embeddingswordbiasesdebiasingemphinformationgendergender-related
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Word embeddings learnt from massive text collections have demonstrated significant levels of discriminative biases such as gender, racial or ethnic biases, which in turn bias the down-stream NLP applications that use those word embeddings. Taking gender-bias as a working example, we propose a debiasing method that preserves non-discriminative gender-related information, while removing stereotypical discriminative gender biases from pre-trained word embeddings. Specifically, we consider four types of information: \emph{feminine}, \emph{masculine}, \emph{gender-neutral} and \emph{stereotypical}, which represent the relationship between gender vs. bias, and propose a debiasing method that (a) preserves the gender-related information in feminine and masculine words, (b) preserves the neutrality in gender-neutral words, and (c) removes the biases from stereotypical words. Experimental results on several previously proposed benchmark datasets show that our proposed method can debias pre-trained word embeddings better than existing SoTA methods proposed for debiasing word embeddings while preserving gender-related but non-discriminative information.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GKnow: Measuring the Entanglement of Gender Bias and Factual Gender

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Gender bias and factual gender knowledge are severely entangled in language model circuits and neurons, making neuron ablation an unreliable method for debiasing.