REVIEW 2 cited by
Skew Howe duality for crystals and the cactus group
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The crystals for a finite-dimensional complex reductive Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ encode the structure of its representations, yet can also reveal surprising new structure of their own. We study the cactus group $C_{\mathfrak{g}}$, constructed using the Dynkin diagram of $\mathfrak{g}$, and its combinatorial action on any $\mathfrak{g}$-crystal via Sch\"{u}tzenberger involutions. We compare this action with that of the Berenstein-Kirillov group on Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns. Henriques and Kamnitzer define an action of $C_n=C_{\mathfrak{gl}_n}$ on $n$-tensor products of $\mathfrak{g}$-crystals, for any $\mathfrak{g}$ as above. We discuss the crystal corresponding to the $\mathfrak{gl}_n \times \mathfrak{gl}_m$-representation $\Lambda^N(\mathbb{C}^n \otimes \mathbb{C}^m),$ derive skew Howe duality on the crystal level and show that the two types of cactus group actions agree in this setting. A future application of this result is discussed in studying two families of maximal commutative subalgebras of the universal enveloping algebra, the shift of argument and Gaudin algebras, where an algebraically constructed monodromy action matches that of the cactus group.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Cactus flower spaces and monodromy of Bethe vectors
Monodromy of Bethe eigenlines over real loci of cactus flower moduli spaces equals the virtual, mirabolic, and affine cactus group actions on tensor products of Kashiwara crystals.
-
Cacti, Toggles, and Reverse Plane Partitions
In type D, the cactus group action on the crystal B(nω1) is generated by length-one and length-two subdiagram elements and factors through the toggle group.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.