REVIEW 3 cited by
Active Preference-Based Gaussian Process Regression for Reward Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Designing reward functions is a challenging problem in AI and robotics. Humans usually have a difficult time directly specifying all the desirable behaviors that a robot needs to optimize. One common approach is to learn reward functions from collected expert demonstrations. However, learning reward functions from demonstrations introduces many challenges: some methods require highly structured models, e.g. reward functions that are linear in some predefined set of features, while others adopt less structured reward functions that on the other hand require tremendous amount of data. In addition, humans tend to have a difficult time providing demonstrations on robots with high degrees of freedom, or even quantifying reward values for given demonstrations. To address these challenges, we present a preference-based learning approach, where as an alternative, the human feedback is only in the form of comparisons between trajectories. Furthermore, we do not assume highly constrained structures on the reward function. Instead, we model the reward function using a Gaussian Process (GP) and propose a mathematical formulation to actively find a GP using only human preferences. Our approach enables us to tackle both inflexibility and data-inefficiency problems within a preference-based learning framework. Our results in simulations and a user study suggest that our approach can efficiently learn expressive reward functions for robotics tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Generalizing Preference-based Reinforcement Learning: a Rationality Model for Incomparability
A Bradley-Terry-style rationality model with an incomparability score based on utility-difference standard deviation recovers multi-dimensional rewards and Pareto frontiers from trajectory comparisons that include inc...
-
Residual Reward Models for Preference-based Reinforcement Learning
Combining a hand-designed or learned prior reward with a preference-trained residual improves sample efficiency and final performance in preference-based reinforcement learning.
-
Learning Implicit Social Navigation Behavior using Deep Inverse Reinforcement Learning
S-MEDIRL, a deep inverse RL method with a bilateral filtering smoothing loss and demonstration extrapolation, learns to yield and avoid deadlock in a narrow crossing, reaching about 92% success.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.