REVIEW 1 cited by
A Systematic Mapping Study in AIOps
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Systematic Mapping Study in AIOps
read the original abstract
IT systems of today are becoming larger and more complex, rendering their human supervision more difficult. Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) has been proposed to tackle modern IT administration challenges thanks to AI and Big Data. However, past AIOps contributions are scattered, unorganized and missing a common terminology convention, which renders their discovery and comparison impractical. In this work, we conduct an in-depth mapping study to collect and organize the numerous scattered contributions to AIOps in a unique reference index. We create an AIOps taxonomy to build a foundation for future contributions and allow an efficient comparison of AIOps papers treating similar problems. We investigate temporal trends and classify AIOps contributions based on the choice of algorithms, data sources and the target components. Our results show a recent and growing interest towards AIOps, specifically to those contributions treating failure-related tasks (62%), such as anomaly detection and root cause analysis.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
NetInjectBench: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injection in Tool-Using Large Language Model Agents for Network Operations
A metadata-aware policy gate yields 0/240 unsafe attack tool actions under metadata integrity while preserving approved high-impact changes, outperforming prompt defenses and static allowlists on NetInjectBench.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.