GMM is Inadmissible Under Weak Identification
read the original abstract
We consider estimation in moment condition models and show that under any bound on identification strength, asymptotically admissible (i.e. undominated) estimators in a wide class of estimation problems must be uniformly continuous in the sample moment function. GMM estimators are in general discontinuous in the sample moments, and are thus inadmissible. We show, by contrast, that bagged, or bootstrap aggregated, GMM estimators as well as quasi-Bayes posterior means have superior continuity properties, while results in the literature imply that they are equivalent to GMM when identification is strong. In simulations calibrated to published instrumental variables specifications, we find that these alternatives often outperform GMM.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Quasi-Bayesian Hierarchical Models
QBHM estimator matches standard GMM asymptotics for strongly identified parameters and is a Bayes rule under squared loss in weak-GMM limit experiments induced by the hierarchy.
-
Multivariable Mendelian randomization with weak instruments: a comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods
MVMR-Pony, a Bayesian method, reduces weak-instrument bias in multivariable Mendelian randomization more effectively than frequentist alternatives in simulation studies covering correlated effects, measurement error, ...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.