How centralized is decentralized? Comparison of wealth distribution in coins and tokens
read the original abstract
Rapidly growing distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) have recently received attention among researchers in both industry and academia. While a lot of existing analysis (mainly) of the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks is available, the lack of measurements for other crypto projects is observed. This article addresses questions about tokenomics and wealth distributions in cryptocurrencies. We analyze the time-dependent statistical properties of top cryptocurrency holders for 14 different distributed ledger projects. The provided metrics include approximated Zipf coefficient, Shannon entropy, Gini coefficient, and Nakamoto coefficient. We show that there are quantitative differences between the coins (cryptocurrencies operating on their own independent network) and tokens (which operate on top of a smart contract platform). Presented results show that coins and tokens have different values of approximated Zipf coefficient and centralization levels. This work is relevant for DLTs as it might be useful in modeling and improving the committee selection process, especially in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and delegated proof of stake (DPoS) blockchains.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
FairWave : A Fairness-Aware Asynchronous DAG-BFT Consensus
FairWave proposes a dual-channel asynchronous DAG-BFT consensus protocol separating super-linear anchor selection from sub-linear reward distribution with lagged reputation to improve fairness metrics while preserving...
-
FairWave : A Fairness-Aware Asynchronous DAG-BFT Consensus
FairWave is a dual-channel asynchronous DAG-BFT consensus protocol using super-linear selection and sub-linear rewards with DAG-derived metrics to improve fairness over pure PoS while preserving safety.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.