Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Multimodal foundation models are better simulators of the human brain

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.08263 v1 pith:54BNSZTS submitted 2022-08-17 cs.NE cs.AIcs.MM

Multimodal foundation models are better simulators of the human brain

classification cs.NE cs.AIcs.MM
keywords multimodalbrainmodelsfoundationhumanlearningbetterdemonstrate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Multimodal learning, especially large-scale multimodal pre-training, has developed rapidly over the past few years and led to the greatest advances in artificial intelligence (AI). Despite its effectiveness, understanding the underlying mechanism of multimodal pre-training models still remains a grand challenge. Revealing the explainability of such models is likely to enable breakthroughs of novel learning paradigms in the AI field. To this end, given the multimodal nature of the human brain, we propose to explore the explainability of multimodal learning models with the aid of non-invasive brain imaging technologies such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Concretely, we first present a newly-designed multimodal foundation model pre-trained on 15 million image-text pairs, which has shown strong multimodal understanding and generalization abilities in a variety of cognitive downstream tasks. Further, from the perspective of neural encoding (based on our foundation model), we find that both visual and lingual encoders trained multimodally are more brain-like compared with unimodal ones. Particularly, we identify a number of brain regions where multimodally-trained encoders demonstrate better neural encoding performance. This is consistent with the findings in existing studies on exploring brain multi-sensory integration. Therefore, we believe that multimodal foundation models are more suitable tools for neuroscientists to study the multimodal signal processing mechanisms in the human brain. Our findings also demonstrate the potential of multimodal foundation models as ideal computational simulators to promote both AI-for-brain and brain-for-AI research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Coarse-to-fine Hierarchical Architecture with Sequential Mamba for Brain Reconstruction

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CHASMBrain uses dual-stream Mamba in a coarse-to-fine hierarchy to predict fMRI from images, reporting 0.429 Pearson correlation and 0.261 MSE on NSD with causal evidence that patch and CLS streams specialize to early...

  2. Leveraging Vision-Language Large Models for Interpretable Video Action Recognition with Semantic Tokenization

    cs.CV 2025-09 reject novelty 3.0

    LVLM-VAR transforms video into 'semantic action tokens' and uses a LoRA-tuned vision-language model to classify actions and generate explanations, reporting 94.1% on NTU RGB+D X-Sub.

  3. Large-Scale AI and Foundation Models for Neuroscience: A Comprehensive Review

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 1.0

    This paper is a survey: it organizes existing foundation-model work in neuroscience into five application domains and lists public datasets, without presenting new experiments.