Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Sensitivity and Robustness of Large Language Models to Prompt Template in Japanese Text Classification Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.08714 v2 pith:FS2IFN7T submitted 2023-05-15 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords modelslanguagepromptjapaneselargemodelperformancecurrent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Prompt engineering relevance research has seen a notable surge in recent years, primarily driven by advancements in pre-trained language models and large language models. However, a critical issue has been identified within this domain: the inadequate of sensitivity and robustness of these models towards Prompt Templates, particularly in lesser-studied languages such as Japanese. This paper explores this issue through a comprehensive evaluation of several representative Large Language Models (LLMs) and a widely-utilized pre-trained model(PLM). These models are scrutinized using a benchmark dataset in Japanese, with the aim to assess and analyze the performance of the current multilingual models in this context. Our experimental results reveal startling discrepancies. A simple modification in the sentence structure of the Prompt Template led to a drastic drop in the accuracy of GPT-4 from 49.21 to 25.44. This observation underscores the fact that even the highly performance GPT-4 model encounters significant stability issues when dealing with diverse Japanese prompt templates, rendering the consistency of the model's output results questionable. In light of these findings, we conclude by proposing potential research trajectories to further enhance the development and performance of Large Language Models in their current stage.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Re-evaluating LLM-based Heuristic Search: A Case Study on the 3D Packing Problem

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-guided evolutionary search, aided by scaffolding and self-correction, discovered a 3D packing scoring function competitive with human heuristics, but the model invented no new algorithm structures and its results ...

  2. Linguistic Features Extracted by GPT-4 Improve Alzheimer's Disease Detection based on Spontaneous Speech

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GPT-4 ratings of five dementia-related language symptoms, added to 40 standard linguistic features, improve automatic Alzheimer's detection from spontaneous speech transcripts, reaching AUROC 0.931 on ADReSS.

  3. Enhancing Semantic Consistency of Large Language Models through Model Editing: An Interpretability-Oriented Approach

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Steering a handful of attention heads with a bias vector derived from consistent prompt pairs improves semantic consistency of LLaMA-2-7B on paraphrased NLU and NLG tasks.

  4. LF-Steering: Latent Feature Activation Steering for Enhancing Semantic Consistency in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    LF-Steering steers sparse-autoencoder features instead of whole layers or attention heads to improve the semantic consistency of Llama-2-7B-Chat on paraphrase benchmarks, but the steering formula discards direction.

  5. Investigating the Scaling Effect of Instruction Templates for Training Multimodal Language Model

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Multimodal language models trained with a medium number of instruction templates (5,000 for 7B, 100 for 13B) outperform both fewer and many more templates, with gains up to 10 points on small benchmark samples.

Pith tools