Using ChatGPT as a Static Application Security Testing Tool
read the original abstract
In recent years, artificial intelligence has had a conspicuous growth in almost every aspect of life. One of the most applicable areas is security code review, in which a lot of AI-based tools and approaches have been proposed. Recently, ChatGPT has caught a huge amount of attention with its remarkable performance in following instructions and providing a detailed response. Regarding the similarities between natural language and code, in this paper, we study the feasibility of using ChatGPT for vulnerability detection in Python source code. Toward this goal, we feed an appropriate prompt along with vulnerable data to ChatGPT and compare its results on two datasets with the results of three widely used Static Application Security Testing tools (Bandit, Semgrep and SonarQube). We implement different kinds of experiments with ChatGPT and the results indicate that ChatGPT reduces the false positive and false negative rates and has the potential to be used for Python source code vulnerability detection.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
An Insight into Security Code Review with LLMs: Capabilities, Obstacles, and Influential Factors
Empirical study finds LLMs outperform static analysis tools for security defect detection in code review, with DeepSeek-R1 best under commit-message plus chain-of-thought prompts.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.