REVIEW 3 cited by
RDBench: ML Benchmark for Relational Databases
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
RDBench: ML Benchmark for Relational Databases
read the original abstract
Benefiting from high-quality datasets and standardized evaluation metrics, machine learning (ML) has achieved sustained progress and widespread applications. However, while applying machine learning to relational databases (RDBs), the absence of a well-established benchmark remains a significant obstacle to the development of ML. To address this issue, we introduce ML Benchmark For Relational Databases (RDBench), a standardized benchmark that aims to promote reproducible ML research on RDBs that include multiple tables. RDBench offers diverse RDB datasets of varying scales, domains, and relational structures, organized into 4 levels. Notably, to simplify the adoption of RDBench for diverse ML domains, for any given database, RDBench exposes three types of interfaces including tabular data, homogeneous graphs, and heterogeneous graphs, sharing the same underlying task definition. For the first time, RDBench enables meaningful comparisons between ML methods from diverse domains, ranging from XGBoost to Graph Neural Networks, under RDB prediction tasks. We design multiple classification and regression tasks for each RDB dataset and report averaged results over the same dataset, further enhancing the robustness of the experimental findings. RDBench is implemented with DBGym, a user-friendly platform for ML research and application on databases, enabling benchmarking new ML methods with RDBench at ease.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Parameter-Free Encoders Remain Viable for RDB Foundation Models
Trainable RDB encoders cannot robustly exploit neighborhood labels as fixed foundation-model features or feature-importance signals, so simple parameter-free encoders stay near-SOTA.
-
No Need to Train Your RDB Foundation Model
Column-wise, parameter-free JUICE encodings let single-table ICL models solve multi-table RDB prediction tasks with no training or fine-tuning.
-
Parameter-Free Encoders Remain Viable for RDB Foundation Models
A parameter-free relational encoder combined with a single-table foundation model matches or beats parameterized, pre-trained RDB encoders on six benchmarks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.