REVIEW 1 cited by
Knowing What LLMs DO NOT Know: A Simple Yet Effective Self-Detection Method
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Knowing What LLMs DO NOT Know: A Simple Yet Effective Self-Detection Method
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great potential in Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. However, recent literature reveals that LLMs generate nonfactual responses intermittently, which impedes the LLMs' reliability for further utilization. In this paper, we propose a novel self-detection method to detect which questions that a LLM does not know that are prone to generate nonfactual results. Specifically, we first diversify the textual expressions for a given question and collect the corresponding answers. Then we examine the divergencies between the generated answers to identify the questions that the model may generate falsehoods. All of the above steps can be accomplished by prompting the LLMs themselves without referring to any other external resources. We conduct comprehensive experiments and demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on recently released LLMs, e.g., Vicuna, ChatGPT, and GPT-4.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
SAVAA: Mitigating Hallucinations in LVLMs via Step-wise Adaptive Visual Attention Amplification
Adaptively scaling visual attention boosting per token, guided by a combined entropy-and-visual-grounding risk score, reduces hallucinations in LVLMs more than fixed boosting.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.