pith. sign in

arxiv: 2406.15211 · v1 · pith:NZY6QAYBnew · submitted 2024-06-21 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

How Effective is GPT-4 Turbo in Generating School-Level Questions from Textbooks Based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy?

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords gpt-4turboquestionsbloomeducationalrevisedtaxonomyevaluate
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We evaluate the effectiveness of GPT-4 Turbo in generating educational questions from NCERT textbooks in zero-shot mode. Our study highlights GPT-4 Turbo's ability to generate questions that require higher-order thinking skills, especially at the "understanding" level according to Bloom's Revised Taxonomy. While we find a notable consistency between questions generated by GPT-4 Turbo and those assessed by humans in terms of complexity, there are occasional differences. Our evaluation also uncovers variations in how humans and machines evaluate question quality, with a trend inversely related to Bloom's Revised Taxonomy levels. These findings suggest that while GPT-4 Turbo is a promising tool for educational question generation, its efficacy varies across different cognitive levels, indicating a need for further refinement to fully meet educational standards.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When AI Evaluates Its Own Work: Validating Learner-Initiated, AI-Generated Physics Practice Problems

    physics.ed-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0

    An exploratory study finds that a curated core of automated checks on learner-initiated AI-generated physics problems aligns with expert judgments and student preferences.