REVIEW 2 cited by
I Need Help! Evaluating LLM's Ability to Ask for Users' Support: A Case Study on Text-to-SQL Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This study explores the proactive ability of LLMs to seek user support. We propose metrics to evaluate the trade-off between performance improvements and user burden, and investigate whether LLMs can determine when to request help under varying information availability. Our experiments show that without external feedback, many LLMs struggle to recognize their need for user support. The findings highlight the importance of external signals and provide insights for future research on improving support-seeking strategies. Source code: https://github.com/appier-research/i-need-help
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ELABORATION: A Comprehensive Benchmark on Human-LLM Competitive Programming
ELABORATION provides a four-stage human-feedback taxonomy and an 8,320-problem dataset, with experiments showing human-LLM collaboration improves pass@1 by about 7 percent.
-
Exploring the Landscape of Text-to-SQL with Large Language Models: Progresses, Challenges and Opportunities
A systematic review organizing LLM-based text-to-SQL methods into pre-processing, in-context learning, fine-tuning, and post-processing paradigms, with a catalog of datasets, metrics, challenges, and future directions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.