Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Use of Large Language Models (LLM) for Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) in Cybercrime Forums

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.03354 v3 pith:VUUK4FRJ submitted 2024-08-06 cs.CR cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.CL
keywords cyberaveragecybercrimeforumsinformationintelligencelargellms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) can be used to analyze cyber threat intelligence (CTI) data from cybercrime forums, which contain extensive information and key discussions about emerging cyber threats. However, to date, the level of accuracy and efficiency of LLMs for such critical tasks has yet to be thoroughly evaluated. Hence, this study assesses the performance of an LLM system built on the OpenAI GPT-3.5-turbo model [8] to extract CTI information. To do so, a random sample of more than 700 daily conversations from three cybercrime forums - XSS, Exploit_in, and RAMP - was extracted, and the LLM system was instructed to summarize the conversations and predict 10 key CTI variables, such as whether a large organization and/or a critical infrastructure is being targeted, with only simple human-language instructions. Then, two coders reviewed each conversation and evaluated whether the information extracted by the LLM was accurate. The LLM system performed well, with an average accuracy score of 96.23%, an average precision of 90% and an average recall of 88.2%. Various ways to enhance the model were uncovered, such as the need to help the LLM distinguish between stories and past events, as well as being careful with verb tenses in prompts. Nevertheless, the results of this study highlight the relevance of using LLMs for cyber threat intelligence.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uncovering Vulnerabilities of LLM-Assisted Cyber Threat Intelligence

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs assisting cyber threat intelligence fail mainly due to spurious correlations, contradictory knowledge, and constrained generalization that stem from the threat landscape itself.

  2. From Text to Actionable Intelligence: Automating STIX Entity and Relationship Extraction

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned LLMs extract STIX entities and relationships from threat reports with per-module F1 scores of 84.4%, 88.5%, 95.5%, and 84.6%, backed by a new 4,011-entity annotated dataset.

Pith tools