REVIEW 1 cited by
Confidence-Aware Document OCR Error Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Confidence-Aware Document OCR Error Detection
read the original abstract
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) continues to face accuracy challenges that impact subsequent applications. To address these errors, we explore the utility of OCR confidence scores for enhancing post-OCR error detection. Our study involves analyzing the correlation between confidence scores and error rates across different OCR systems. We develop ConfBERT, a BERT-based model that incorporates OCR confidence scores into token embeddings and offers an optional pre-training phase for noise adjustment. Our experimental results demonstrate that integrating OCR confidence scores can enhance error detection capabilities. This work underscores the importance of OCR confidence scores in improving detection accuracy and reveals substantial disparities in performance between commercial and open-source OCR technologies.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Beyond Logprobs: A Multi-Signal Confidence Engine for LLM-Based Document Field Extraction
ExtractConf fuses Hunter-Mapper disagreement with LLM uncertainty, OCR, image quality and layout into a classifier that reaches 0.928 ROC AUC on DocILE invoices and 0.858 on CORD receipts, cutting selective prediction...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.